Laserfiche WebLink
41, E. PUBLIC HEARINGS: <br /> 1. LANDS OF VARSANYI, FILE TM #4-88, 12631 Mira Loma Way, request for <br /> approval of tentative map and negative declaration -- Resolution <br /> approving tentative map <br /> The City Council had before them the Director of Public Works report <br /> dated 5/31/89 which included the recommendation that the Council <br /> certify the negative declaration and approve the proposed tentative <br /> map for a two-lot subdivision subject to conditions of approval and <br /> with the conditional exception to allow the road right-of-way of <br /> MiraLoma Way to be less than 60 ' . <br /> Mr. Melvin Hill, applicant ' s representative, referred to the <br /> conditions and noted that they did have an old shed on lot #2 that <br /> they wanted to keep and use for storage. Mr. Hill also commented that <br /> they were planning on building a one story house but would appreciate <br /> an increase from 4 , 500 to 4 ,750 square feet and from 20 ' height to 24 ' <br /> With these increases the project would still be well below the <br /> allowable development and height for the project. <br /> Casey commented on the road right-of-way issue, height and amount of <br /> floor area and was concerned that undue restrictions were being placed <br /> on this lot which had not been imposed on the neighbors . The proposed <br /> height, even with the increases requested by Mr. Hill, were well below <br /> the allowable figures. Casey also noted that there were several <br /> petitions on file at Town Hall which stated the neighbors ' concurrence <br /> with the proposed project. <br /> Mrs. Ruth Reiserer, 24561 Summerhill Court, stated that a number of <br /> people signed the petitions and then regretted that they had. She <br /> believed the amount of property under discussion was questionable to <br /> hold two lots and she thought the conditions as recommended by the <br /> Planning Commission for 20 ' and 4, 500 square feet should not be <br /> changed. <br /> Mr. Water Strate, Mountain View, stated that he was the previous owner <br /> of the property under discussion and commented on the road right-of- <br /> way issue. He noted that the existing 30 ' road right-of-way was not <br /> consistent on Mira Loma and he believed it should be proportionally <br /> developed on either side of the road. <br /> Mrs . Helen Rouse, 12580 Mira Loma, stated her concerns about drainage <br /> and one acre minimums. She stated that in 1949 they had had their <br /> property resurveyed. They are on easements now and if the road was <br /> widened, they would not have one acre. On the other hand, she also <br /> commented on the expense and responsibility of maintaining Mira Loma. <br /> 4 -4- 6/7/89 <br />