City Council Minutes
7/1/2015 3:41:33 PM
7/1/2015 3:41:33 PM
Regular Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
All rights reserved.
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL <br /> TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS <br /> 26379 Fremont Road <br /> Los Altos Hills, California <br /> MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING <br /> Saturday, January 23, 1988 <br /> cc: Reel 189 , Tr . II , Side II , 447-end <br /> Mayor Tryon called the Adjourned Regular Meeting to order at 12: 10 <br /> p.m. in the Council Chambers at Town Hall . She commented that Mayor <br /> Pro Tem Siegel was undergoing surgery and everyone wished him their <br /> best for a speedy recovery. <br /> A. ROLL CALL: <br /> Present: Mayor Tryon and Councilmembers Dronkert, Plummer and <br /> van Tamelen <br /> Absent: Mayor Pro Tem Siegel <br /> Staff: City Manager George Scarborough, City Attorney Frank <br /> Gillio and City Clerk Pat Dowd <br /> B. PREPARATION BY CITY COUNCIL OF REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF <br /> ADOBE CREEK LODGE INITIATIVE: <br /> Council had before them two draft arguments which had been prepared by <br /> the appointed sub-committee of the Council (Plummer and Tryon) . <br /> Judith Carico, 25311 O' Keefe, Sheri Emling, 11853 Murietta Lane, Judy <br /> Zurbriggen, 11800 Murietta Lane and Carol Phy, 25616 Moody Road, each <br /> addressed the Council with comments/suggestions regarding the draft <br /> rebuttals under discussion. <br /> PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To agree that the rebuttal to the argument in <br /> favor of the Abobe Creek Lodge Initiative would read as follows: <br /> The argument in favor of Measure B is misleading. There is nothing in <br /> this initiative about the size of housing units or number of <br /> occupants. There are no guarantees that the properties will be used <br /> only for senior housing. There is no process for public review of <br /> "accessory uses and structures" . Measure B purports to be about <br /> senior housing, but it really is not. Measure B does not assure more <br /> senior housing, only much higher density. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.