09/21/1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

E. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 41 1. Ordinance # amending code regarding Section 10-1 .502 (development area) and Section 10-1 .503 (floor area) (FIRST READING) (continued from last meeting) Council discussed the proposed ordinance before them concerning development area and floor area. It was agreed that there should be a broader approach to reaching the desired goals and that this was really a short term solution. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel , seconded by van Tamelen and passed unanimously to not approve the proposed amendments to the zoning ordinance regarding development area and floor area. 2 . LANDS OF MCCULLOCH, FILE TM #4-87, Stonebrook and Prospect, request for tentative map and negative declaration approval for a thirty- five lot subdivision - Resolution # approving tentative map for Lands of McCulloch The Mayor noted that because of the complexity of this subdivision and the new information which had just been received, if Council concurred, the public hearing would be held at this meeting and the matter would be continued to the next City Council Meeting unless Council decided to hold a special meeting on the issue. The Director of Public Works gave an overview of the 9/16/88 Planning Director' s staff report (on file at Town Hall ) . Robert Saxe, applicant' s attorney, presented a brief overview of the property and noted that with the exception of a couple of issues the applicant was in agreement with the conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission. Mr. Saxe did state that they believed the Environmental Impact Report should be certified. He commented that regarding noise they felt that mitigation measures could be tailored for each lot rather than imposing overall rigid methods (i .e. closing windows) and regarding traffic a report had been prepared by Mr. Larson and he was available to answer any questions. Regarding Condition #45, Mr. Saxe suppported not including parcels A and B in the proposed subdivision. Certificates of compliance had been issued; therefore, the Town does not need a subdivision map to now bring them into existence. The owners of the lots did not want to be included in the subdivision and Mr. Saxe asked for careful review of this condition. Mr. Warren Whaley, applicant, addressed the noise issue and referred to the report dated 9/20/88 prepared by Edward L. Pack Associates. Mr. Louis H. Larson, Traffic Engineer, referred to his report dated 9/21/88 . He did note that he did not address the traffic issue at Priscilla and Stonebrook as he did not perceive there to be one there due to the stop signs. law -4- 9/21/88