10/05/1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

F. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (continued) : Mr. Robert Saxe , applicant ' s attorney, noted that there were several other issues to be addressed concerning this project, such as traffic, pathways and the proposed condition that parcels A and B be a part of the subdivision. He reiterated his statements that he did not believe this condition was appropriate. Mr. Donald Dean, representing EIP Associates , stated that the proposed Quarry Project had been included in the traffic analysis done for Lands of McCulloch and the conclusion was that there was not a significant impact on traffic. If the Quarry Project was approved, there would no longer be truck traffic . They also did not recommend any improvement to the traffic signal at Stonebrook and El Monte. Mary Ellen Silver, Prospect, stated that she lived across the street from the proposed subdivision and she believed there was a real traffic problem and there should be another stop sign. Mrs . Silver noted there were bikers, joggers , pedestrians , equestrians in addition to the car traffic. Mrs. Silver asked EIP at what time they took their survey and she was advised that the survey was taken on Tuesday and Wednesday, May 19 & 20 , 1987 between 7 : 45 and 8 : 45 a.m. , noon and 1 : 00 p.m. , and 5 : 15 and 6 : 15 p.m. Maynard Stevenson, 24785 Prospect, disagreed with the recommendations from EIP Associates. He believed there should be another access possibly off Magdalena. Walter Gregorwich, 12370 Priscilla, also asked if a Magdalena access had been considered and EIP stated that it had not; all traffic had been counted coming from Stonebrook. Mr. Gregorwich also stated that drainage was a serious issue to be addressed regarding this project. Doni Hubbard, 25228 La Loma, also commented on her concerns regarding traffic. The road now was dangerous and she never thought such large projects would be approved without additional improvements to the road and stop signs. Rick Slevin, Priscilla, stated that he had lived in Town for about 1 1/2 years and the road was noisy now and would be much worse with an additional subdivision. Cindy Hettinger, Priscilla, stated that she thought the intersection at El Monte and Stonebrook needed to be improved to allow for the additional traffic . Christine Cole, 23219 Ravensbury, inquired whether the increased noise on Stonebrook had been considered as well as that on 280 from additional traffic and she was informed that it had. Dot Schreiner, Pathways Recreation and Parks Committee, referred to the modified recommendation from their committee concerning the pathways and asked for clarification of where the additional access would go on the property. Mr. Carter, applicant, noted that the access to El Monte was a possible pathway and lots 1 and 2 provided an existing potential for pathways . Mr. Carter also stated that the 411/ -5- 10/5/88