12/07/1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

E. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (continued) : Mr. Rick Ellinger, 28520 Matadero Creek Lane and secretary of the Architectural Review Committee, stated that their committee had reviewed the plans and model for Mr. Viso ' s home and found them to be in compliance with the conditions , covenants and restrictions of the subdivision. Mr. David Cooper, Lot #10 - Matadero Creek Subdivision - expressed his support for Mr. Viso ' s project stating that it aesthetically fit into the area and could be adequately screened by a sufficient number of trees . Mr. and Mrs . Kenneth Wright, 27791 Edgerton Road and Mr. T.F. Change , 27330 Ursula Lane, addressed the Council opposing Mr. Viso' s project. Mr . Wright referred to his recent letter to the Council which had been signed by several residents also supporting this opposition. They supported the spirit of a rural environment and believed Mr. Viso' s request was unreasonable and precedent setting. Council discussed the proposed project before them and noted that in May of 1988 Mr. Viso had been granted increases in the maximum development area (11, 175 square feet) and maximum floor area (7 , 450 square feet) for Lot #12 at Matadero Creek. van Tamelen reiterated the original purpose of the Matadero Creek Subdivision and the emphasis on open space. She also noted that everyone who purchased a lot in that subdivision knew of the conditions , covenants and restrictions which were imposed on the property. Johnson also commented on the Matadero Creek Sub-Committee which was reviewing the conditions imposed on the subdivision and noted his support for equitable regulations for the residents of the subdivision and the rest of the Town. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel , seconded by van Tamelen and passed unanimously to uphold the Planning Commission' s decision to deny the requested variance in maximum development area and maximum floor area and the Planning Commission' s decision to therefore deny the requested site development permit for the proposed house, which, without a variance, can not be granted a zoning permit. The Acting City Manager noted for the record that this application from Mr. Viso was now completed and he would have to submit a new application for Lot #12 . Councilmember Tryon noted that she had to leave the meeting and asked if the items on Police Services and Town Hall Master Plan could be brought forward on the agenda. She also asked if she could present her report on Trial Court Funding at this time in the meeting. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by van Tamelen and passed unanimously to concur with Councilmember Tryon ' s request for changes to the agenda. -4- 12/7/88