08/06/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Dennis Sullivan, potential buyer, addressed the Council with the following two issues: who was ultimately going to be responsible for future repair work and could he get some assurance from the Town that the garage would not have to be removed. The City Attorney noted that the Town had granted a Site Development Permit and could not require the removal of the garage. If the sewer line were located, the City Attorney recommended the paper easement be changed to reflect this information. b) Request from Mr. Garber for temporary encroachment on the cul-de-sac of Horseshoe Court for a fence The City Manager reported that a request had been received from Mr. Garber to install a temporary security fence across Horseshoe Court. He was making this request as his construction job trailer had been vandalized. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Dronkert, seconded by van Tamelen and passed unanimously to authorize Mr. Garber to construct a temporary security fence across Horseshoe Court at the entrance to the bulb of the cul-de-sac with the condition that the fence be removed by Mr. Garber prior to final inspection of the buidling under construction. c) Lands of Babayan, Atherton Court, consid- eration of Town Ordinance violations Due to a possible conflict of interest, Councilmember Tryon requested permission to remove herself from the Council table for discussion of the Lands of Babayan. Councilmember Tryon received permission from the Council and resumed her place at the Council table when discussion of this item was completed. The City Manager referred to his 8/1/86 staff report which included the report that the house on Lands of Babayan is approximately ten feet closer to the property line than shown on the site plan granting a special land use permit and is 1'8" higher than weu4-d--be*allowed under the special land use permit. The different location of the house may be considered by Council as a significant modification of the special land use aproval and the increase in height does violate a Council direction that the height of an approved special land use permit will not increase by more than one foot without prior approval by the Council. The City Manager's report included the following two options identifiable by staff: 1) require that the slope of the roof and therefore the height of the structure be reduced to the maximum extent possible or 2) direct Site Development Committee to require appropriate measures to mitigate impact on neighbors from the change in development. (The City Manager's report including the 7/31/86 City Engineer's report and the 7/31/86 Engineering ` Technician's report are on file at Town Hall.) *had been (AMENDED BY COUNCIL 8/20/86) -8-