09/17/1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

comply with any changed requirements in the Town's amended Zoning t Law applicable to his project.' The City Attorney further com- 41val mented that one of the options Council had before them was to adopt an urgency ordinance allowing the issuance of building permits under the existing Town Zoning Law for certain described applications. Several persons addressed the Council explaining their situations and requesting a time extension for their applications. Mr. Fred Haeckl, Lot #25, Blandor Way, noted that at the 9/3/86 Council meeting he had received an exception to the septic system requirements for Lot #25. As a result his plans needed to be changed and he was requesting a four week extension from the ef- fective date of Ordinance #305 to get his building permit. Mr. Ward, Via Ventana, presented a brief background on his ap- plication for an addition and a swimming pool. He noted they had begun the process some time ago, had had several meetings with staff, had invested a fair amount of money in the project, had thought they had to some time in the fall to get their plans in and were now requesting an extension to 11/3/86. Mr. Martin Kampf, landscape architect for Mr. Ward, reiterated Mr. Ward's request for an extension. Mr. Michael Moyer, Ward's architect, gave a history of his meetings with Town Staff and referred to documents on file concerning their application, the timetable in- volved, etc. He, too, requested that they be allowed to submit schematic and elevation plans by 11/3/86. Mr. Ray Cobb, architect for Lands of Wong, Lot #7 - Dawson Drive, and Lands of Chantalat, 11681 Dawson Drive, commented that the Wong application would not be affected by the new ordinance; how- ever, the Chantalat's application would be affected. This project had been approved by the Site Development Committee and Planning Commission, had been appealed by a resident and the appeal had been overruled by the Planning Commission. They had spent a long time on the application and he was requesting an extension of 90 days to submit plans. Council discussed the options before them. Tryon stated her strong feelings that anyone who had a special land use permit could reasonably be given additional time to get a building permit to comply with the new ordinance. Dronkert concurred and further commented that while she was in favor of Ordinance #305 and wanted to see it in place, she noted that some residents were caught in the process of implementation of the new ordinance. MOTION SECONDED AND WITHDRAWN: Moved by Dronkert, seconded by van Tamelen and withdrawn to adopt an urgency ordinance which would allow those applicants who had received a special land use permit or those who had received site development approval if a special land use permit did not apply or a zoning approval if site devel- t opment and special land use permits were not required prior to -3-