Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - April 17, 1985 <br />B. CONSENT CALENDAR: Items Removed from the Consent Calendar (continued): <br />`, 5. Actions of the Planning Cannission: approved the following: <br />b) LANDS OF PLOUGH, FILE VAR #8-84, 24692 Olive Tree Court, request for <br />variance to encroach into the front yard setback by a ntaxx ,m of ten <br />feet and into the side yard setback by a mmaxinun of 6;' for the purpose <br />of constructing a garage. <br />van Tammelen stated that she had removed this item from the Consent Calendar for <br />a report from the Planning Commissioner. Commissioner Lachenbruch stated that <br />while the Commission had approved this variance request, he personally had voted <br />against it as he had serious concerns about the interpretation of the variance <br />requirenents. In his opinion the question was should the applicant be permitted <br />to build out even further on a lot that was already heavily developed? <br />MITION SEO)NDED AND CARRIED: Moved by van Tamelen, seconded by Dronkert arra passed <br />by the following roll call vote to concur with the Planning Commission's approval <br />of Lands of Plough, File Variance 48-84. <br />AYES: Councilmembers Dronkert, Fuhrman and van Tamelen <br />NOES: Mayor Allison <br />ABSENT: Councilme ber Rydell <br />c) LANDS OF HUNTCN, FILE PM #9-84, 25600 Fernhill Drive, request for lot <br />line adjustment <br />d) LANDS OF WUBBELS/ALVAREZ, FILE PM #7-84, 13861 La Paloma Road, request <br />for lot line adjustment <br />Allison stated that he had removed these items from the Consent Calendar because <br />previously. Council had stated that they would not grant variances in the future <br />to less advantaged properties resulting from lot line adjustments. Did Council <br />wish to specifically state their position again regarding the Lards of Huston and <br />the Lards of vhrbbels/Alvarez? <br />Mrs. Martha Hunton, applicant, explained that their purpose in requesting the lot <br />line adjustment was to protect their home from nearby development on the next <br />lot. She concurred with the proposal of an agreement precluding future requests <br />for variances and it was agreed the City Attorney would prepare such an agreement <br />for her signature. It was further agree] this docummmn would be/rrecorded. (AMMED <br />The concern for future variance requests did not actually apply to the lot line <br />adjustment for the Lands of WubbelsJAlvarez in that the adjustment would bring <br />both lots into compliance with the local subdivision ordinance requirements. <br />MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Allison, seconded by van Tamelen and passed <br />unanimously by all members present to concur with the Planning Ccnmission's approval <br />of the lot line adjustments for Lards of Hunton, File PM #9-84 and Lards of Wubbels/ <br />Alvarez, File PM #7-84. <br />C. PRFSENTATLONS FROM THE FLOOR: none <br />-3- <br />