04/17/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OD[NCIL KMITES - April 17, 1985 E. SPECIAL ORDERS: Item l.d) Lands of Creekside Court (continued): VAW Mr. Robert Foulk, applicant, disagreed with the Planning Commission's recammnda- tion of a 50' conservation easement along Matadero Creek. While he acknowledged this was a riparian habitat, he expressed the opinion that 50' was excessive and suggested a 20' conservation easement with appropriate plantings. Mr. Clayton Bavor, 13816 Page Mill Road, strongly supported the conservation easement as proposed by the Planning Commission. The easement would alleviate the erosion problem, protect the animals and provide a mise buffer to the neighboring properties. Mr. Bavor also questioned the placement of the pathway along his property. He was particularly concerned about the erosion problem and the impact on his privacy. Barbara Trvon, member - Pathways Committee, reported that the slope had been a deciding factor in placing the path. Mrs. Raymond Handley, 13818 Page Mill Road, suggested that the placement of the pathway should be the burden of the developer, not the present neighbors. Mr. Richard Stark, 13686 Page Mill Road, concurred with Mrs. Hanlley's convents. He also supported the conservation easement as proposed by the Planning Commission and further suggested that a covenant be placed in the deed by the developer to insure architecturally sensitive hones. Mr. Edward Stewart, 27850 Limine Road, asked if Mr. Foulk would agree to future sewer hook-ups. Mr. Foulk concurred, noting it would be along lot 5 on Faun Hill Ct. Mr. Foulk, applicant, in response to questions concerning drainage, noted that the drainage world all go to Fawn Hill Ct., not to the Bavor's property. Mr. Foulk also commented that there would be architectural control of the property and that he had agreed to the change of name from Creekside Court to Fawn Hill Ct. MM70N SECONDED AND FA=: Moved by van. Tamelen, seconded by FUhrmsn and failed by the following roll call vote to approve the conservation easement as proposed by the Planning Commission. AYES: COunlcilmuRwrs Fuhrnen and van Tamelen WES: Mayor Allison and Coumilme bee Dronkert ABSENT: Councilmemoer Rydell Dronkert courented that in her opinion the conservation easement as recommended by the Planning Comussion was not equitable to other properties in the Town. MOTION FA= DUE TO LACK OF A SECOND: hbved by Dronkert to require a 30' con- servation easement with a 50' setback for any structure. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Allison, seconded by van Tamelen and passed by the following roll call vote to approve a 30' conservation easement for lot #6 on one side and to the property line on the other side, with a 50' setback. AYES: Mayor Allison and Ccuncilmembers Dronkert and Fuhnnan NOES: Councilmember van Tamelen ABSENT: Cbuncilmenber Rydell