09/18/1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY COUNCIL KDVMS - September 18, 1985 F. UNFINISHED BUSngESS: 1. Items Removed from the Consent Calendar: a) Approval of Minutes: September 4, 1985 NCTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Paved by FUhnman, seconded by Allison and passel unanimously by all members present to approve the minutes of the September 4, 1985 Council Meeting with the following corrections: the following statement to be included at the beginning of the minutes: 'Frank B. Duveneck died on Monday. This community will never again experience the kind of sharing and caring that was the total life of the Duvenecks - sharing their tome and lard, caring for that land and for all people. I call the meeting to order in honor of Frank B. Duvereck.; page 7: Item 2.a) 4th paragraph, amended to read - . , whether or not to roadside spray ten feet beyond the pavement.'; page 7, Item 2.b) 1st paragraph amended to read - . .members who resign should be required to resign directly to the Council by letter.; page 6, Item J.1 amended to read as follows - . .unanimously to substitute the Christmas Eve Holiday for the Admission Day Holiday.' b) LAMS OF HDBLFS, FILE SA #5-85, 14463 Liddicoat Circle, request for approval of site approval Mr. Robles, applicant, stated that he removed this item from the Consent Calendar because he was opposed to Conditions 1.A and 1.B as added by the Planning Commission at their 9/11/85 meeting and he was requesting that Council delete these two conditions. Mr. Robles stated that in lieu of a pathway easement he would be willing to deed a 10' easement to the Tuan. He also stated that neighboring lots had received site approvals {,. some time ago and had not been required to dedicate conservation easements. Mr. Robles further stated that he felt his use of the conservation easement would be extremely restricted and that the value of his property would be lessened. Mr. Michael Hu, 3791 Ross Road, Palo Alto, stated that he was planning to purchase the land from Mr. Robles and he too 0 i- ted to conditions 1.A and 1.B for the same reasons as expressed by Mr. Robles. Council and staff discussed the history of pathway and conservations easements in the Tuan and staff noted that there was the possibility of a covenant running with the land. Mary Stutz, Chairman - Pathways Committee, concurred with condition 1.A which required a wide Pathway easement ong the northerly property line along 280. She noted that until all the other property owners and Stanford were a part of the pathway, the path would not be used. John Riley, applicant's engineer, stated that it was his opinion the conservation easement was like a b ark as to whit could be taken away frau the property owner whereas a covenant would state specifically what could be done. Mri'ION FA= DDE TO IACK OF A SECOND: Moved by Allison to approve oonlition 1.A 'The owner shall dedicate a ten foot (10') wide pathway easement along the northerly property line (along 1-280), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Pathway Committee.' PAS= BY CONSENSUS: To concur with the applicant's request to continue consideration of this item to the next Council meeting. -5-