03/26/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CM CmUIL MINUTES - March 26, 1984 D. AGFIT24ENT FOR INTERIM EMINEERI14G SERVICES: PASSED BY CONSENSUS- To continue Item D to the next Council meeting. MOTION EaCONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Perkins, seconded by Allison and passed unanimously by all members present to authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement for interim erx_Tmeering services and to return said agreement to Council for ratification. Council discussed the proposed agreement before them with Max Meyer for the performance of financial consulting services. Allison recomnnded that Mr. Mleyer submit a report of his activities for the Town on a regular basis. Perkins expressed concern as to whom Mr. Meyer was responsible. It was agreed that it be clearly stated perhaps by letter that he is responsible to the City manager. Louise Dronkert, Member - Finance Coranittee, expressed coaoern about the overall cost. �E�d this agreamant7�ri—thblr. Meyer and an ACCGUnt-TenP Person keep the Town within budget for this fiscal year? Nan Fubrman, Chairman - Finance Committee, responded to the question raised by Council as to the need for Mr. Meyer EE—be available for Finance Camnittee meetings. She noted that he certainly would not need to attend all of them or for that matter attend the entire meeting wt� asked to be present. She indicated perhaps � hour every 2-3 weeks. #bw MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Allison, seconded by Perkins and passed unanimously by all nimters present to adopt Resolution #22-84 approving and authorizing execution of an agrement between the city of the Town of We Altos Hills and Max Meyer with the following amendments, Section l.a. to read 'Meyer shall confer with representatives of Town and furnish advisory services to Town management on financial matters, as specifically approved by the City Council, on an on-going basis.'; The following clause to be added to contract - "services as required up to eight hours per week". PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To confirm that Mr. Meyer will be conferring with the Finance Contnittee in the most cost effective manner. 4br DISCUSSION OF MOLITTAIN VIEW LANDFILL AJGEUUZ= The City Attorney referred to his letter dated 3/23/84 which addressed several concerns and questions regarding the draft of the proposed 1984 Solid Waste Disposal Participation Agreeent with Mountain View. In part the City Attorney cited the following issues: limitation of obligation; payment of closure costs; hold harmless clause; question regarding involveaent of County in proposed agreement; can Palo Alto join in and claim rights under Ferrari Agreement?; and charge for material originating in County and comingling with cities. It was agreed that more information was needed and certain questions needed to be answered. The item could be reviewed again at the April 4, 1984 Council neeting -2-