09/05/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CTTY COUNCIL MIfAW - September 5, 1984 D. SPECIAL ORDERS: Item D.5 - Re -roofing of Town Hall (continued): Dronkert did not think that extra finds should be appropriated for the roofing project; however, she did ask that the City Manager indicate what line item of the budget world be transferred. The City Manager responded that the fords were available and would provide the Council with an accounting of the transfer; however, he did suggest that in the future budget amendments be made prior to awarding contract M3TICN SEMNDED AMID CAIU=: Moved by Fthxman, seconded by van Tamelen and passed unanimously to adopt Resolution #92-84 awarding a contract for the re -roofing of Town Hall (Adams Enterprises, Inc. - $7,644). E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Payments under 1984 Solid Waste Disposal Participation Agreemnt The City Manager presented his report dated 8/31/84 which referred to the Solid Waste Disposal Participation Agreement with Mountain view to provide landfill capacity for the Town for the next ten years. In connection with this agreement, the Tbwn's FY 1984-85 operation and maintenance payments to Mountain View will be $48,700 and the Town's debt service payments will be $65,358. There is also a requirement that one -year's debt service be placed in reserve. The interest earned on the reserve fund will be paid to the Tuan. MDTICN SEQ7MDED AMID CARRIED: Moved by Dronkert, seconded by FUhxman and passed unanimously to direct staff to prepare an addendum to the agreement with the Ins Altos Garbage Company establishing the schedule for payment to the Thom by the company of the funis required by the landfill agreement. This addendum to agree- ment will be agendized for the next Council meeting. 1-Il'1'ION SECCNDED AMID CARRIED: Moved by Dronkert, seconded by Fuhrman and passed unan musly to direct staff to prepare a budget amendment for the next Ceuncil meeting appropriating the finds required by the landfill agreement during the 1984-85 year. 2. Planning Commission Expense Reimbursement ($50/month) Commissioner Siegel reported that the Commission had discussed this matter at their last meeting and were of the opinion that the present reimbursemat of $50 per month was reasonable and satisfactory. However, they did have the suggestion that the representatives from the Pathway Committee and the Environmental Design, Parks and Recreation Committee who sat on the Site Development/Subdivisions review boards should also receive $50/month. Drcnkert offered to meet with a representa- tive of the Planning Commission to discuss this recomnendation. 3. Int Line Adjustment Policy Reoomendation: Council discussed the 8/31/84 report from Staff Planner Lytle on lot line adjust- ment policy recommendation. In particular Council reviewed the statement that the Planning Commission would act as the decision-making body, with the item being referred to Council only on appeal, van Tamelen mm nennted that Council should be aware of these planning matters and suggested lot line adjustu ants be placed on the `� Consent Calendar,es following the same procedure now in place for variances and v conditional use permits. M7TICN EEOONDED AMID CARRIED: Moved by Dronkert, seconded by van Tamelen and passed unanimously to adopt the Planning Commission's moommendation regarding lot line -4-