12/21/1983 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City'Council Minutes - December 21, 1963 'Page ri� C. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR:(continued) 1. Representatives from CROAKS review, prepared by CROAKE. City Council thanked CROAKE for their presentation. 2. Mr. Fishley, 26008 'Todd Lane, questioned City Council on the proposed ordinance relating to second units, mainly concerned Over access, noting the proposed ordinance indicates access be from one driveway; stating his property has an upper and lower level and this would not be feasible on this lot, asking that a provision be made for lots such as his. City Council informed Mr. Fishley the ordinance as proposed eliminates properties with 2 access points, which has been a problem with some properties in the Town in the past, noting as the Town must act on this ordinance within a certain amount of time, which the clock is running out, if the Town does not adopt this ordinance we would need to follow state laws set forth in the legislation. 1. Ordinance #282 amending Section 9-5.1110 of Chapter 5 of Title 9 of the Los Altos Hills Municipal Code (concerning procedures for variances and conditional use permits) SECOND READING MOTIIN SECONDED AMID CARRIED: Moved by Proft, seconded by Allison and passed unanimously to continue this item to January 18, 1984 City Council ` Agenda. 2. Ordinance #283 amending Chapter 5 entitled "Zoning" of the Los Altos Hills Municipal Code by amending Sections 9-5.217 and 9-5.703 concerning secondary dwellings and Section 9-5.601 concerning required parking spaces SECOND READING MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Proft, seconded by Perkins and passed unanimously to waive further reading. Councilman_ Perkins expressed concern over access as Mr. Fishley indicated earlier, making a motion proposing to add "wherever possible", as there was no second motion failed. Council and staff reviewed the proposed ordinance and state legislation with regard to size of living area, definition of second units, rentals to be allowed. Mr. Oscar Sobel, 28266 Christophera Iane, asked Council not to pass this ordinance in a hurry, wait and see what other cities are doing with this state legislation. Councilman Allison, opposed to passing this ordinance because the state legislation says if we fail to adopt we're required to grant permits for attached units 108 less of living area, furthermore, in as march it is the intent of state legislation to encourage rentals and by passing this ordinance for no rentals we're only looking for opposition.