Laserfiche WebLink
CITY NUINrll. <br />4c TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS <br />26379 Fremont Road <br />Los Altos Hills, California <br />MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING <br />Wednesday, April 21, 1982 <br />cc: Reel 133, Tr. II, Side, II, 080 -end <br />Mayor Perkins called the Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at 7:30 p.m. <br />in the Council Chambers of Town Hall. <br />A. RDLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: <br />Present: Mayor Perkins and Councilnembers Allison, Hillestad, Proft and van Tamelen <br />Absent: None <br />Staff: City Manager Robert Crowe, City Planner John Carlson, Assistant City <br />Attorney William Hughes, Planning Commission Representative Judith <br />Carico and Deputy City Clerk Pat Dowel <br />Press: Florence Pallakoff, Los Altos Town Crier and John Haess, Peninsula <br />Times Tribune <br />Matadero Creek Subdivision - Bid Openings <br />Mayor Perkins read a statement which explained the process of the bid openings. <br />Before the bidding began Council noted that a typographical error had been noted <br />in the terms and conditions as set forth in Resolution #1428. <br />MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Hillestad, seconded by Proft and passed <br />unaninausly to amend the terms and conditions as set forth in Resolution #1428 <br />by changing condition #1 to delete lot 5 and add lot 7. <br />The City Clerk noted that four sealed bids had been received for lots at <br />Matadero Creek. <br />MOTION SECONDED AMID CARRIED: Moved by Hillestad, seconded by Proft and passed <br />unanimously to accept the bid made by D.F. Cooper in the amount of $250,501 <br />for Lot 10. <br />After the bid for Lot 12 had been read, representatives of the bidder had <br />questions and requested clarification of the development area for that lot. <br />Perkins suggested that the bidder meet with the City Engineer to discuss <br />the matter and Council agreed that this bid should be continued to the next <br />Council meeting. <br />MOTION SEODNDED AM CARRIED: Moved by Proft, seconded by Hillestad and passed <br />unanimously to continue consideration of the bid for Lot 12 to the next Council <br />meeting with the understanding that at that time there would again be the oppor- <br />` tunity for oral bids. <br />