05/19/1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY ODUNCIL MINUTES - May 19, 1982 ( D. STAFF - RERDRTS, CDRRPSPONDENCE AMID AkWUNCEMENTS:(continued) far Regarding item #7 of the report concerning negotiations for alternate sites for sanitary landfill, Allison requested a copy of the tentative agreemnt and additional background information prior to the next Council meeting. Preliminary Budget: The City Manager noted that the preliminary budget should be available by the end of the month. Van Tamelen noted that the fence on Magdalena between 280 and Ravensbury was badly broken and questioned whether it was the Town's responsibility. The City Manger noted that he would look into the matter. Westwind: van Tamelen questioned whether the caTiplaint Council had received concerning a noise problem at Nk_stwin4 had been im:estigated. The City Manager noted that Westwind was not violating any of the Town's codes and Allison noted that he had spoken with Westwind aenibers and they were cooperating with the Tann. The Mayor asked the City Manager to obtain a weekend schedule from Westwind of their activities which included heavy equigmnt, etc. Spangle - Proposal regarding site development regulations: 5/14/82 letter frau Spangle noting that services for this project will not exceed a cost of $4,000 and also outlining what services will be performed. MDTION SECONDED AMID CARRIED: Moved by Proft, seconded by Allison and passed unanimr,usly to direct the City Attorney to prepare a contract with William Spangle for professional services regarding site development regulations for Council approval at next Council meeting. The City Manager referred to his 5/18/82 moo regarding storm damage on a section of Page Mill Road between Alexis and Story Hill. He noted that this was the Town's responsibility and the street department had been directed to begin the repair work. E. SPECIAL ORDERS: 1. Public Hearings: a) Request for Tentative Map Approval, Lands of Eshner, File TM #10-81 (continued frau 5/5/82 Council meeting) Proft expressed serious concerns that the maps before Council were not the revised maps as approved by the Planning Ca ssion. MDTION MADE AMID SEODMIDED: Moved by Proft, seconded by Perkins to continua consideration of this item to the next meeting with the concurrence of the applicant and with the correct revised map. Al Woolworth, applicant, disagreed with continuing the item. In his opinion it was a mi rnr change which would be reflected on the final map and the final map would also go to Council for approval. PASSED BY ODNSENSUS: To withdraw the motion made by Proft, seconded by Perkins to continue consideration of this item to the next meeting with the concurrence of the applicant and with the correct revised nap. (Pnended by Council 6/2/82) -4-