Laserfiche WebLink
CTTy COUNCIL MINUTES - June 16, 1982 <br />planning ca mission Vacancies - Interviews (continued): <br />MYTION CARRIED By THE FOLLOWING BOLL CALL VOTE to appoint Jean Struthers to the <br />planning Ccnmission for a four-year term. <br />AYES: Mayor Perkins and CouncL members Hillestad and van Tamelen <br />AGES: Councidnrambers Allison and Proft <br />Council thanked Mr. Dai for his interest in the Town and noted that his applica- <br />tion and Mr. Reneau's would be kept on file for future reference. <br />Matadero Creek Subdivision - Bid Openings - Lot 12 <br />At the 6/2/82 Council meeting the City Attorney was directed to prepare a resolution <br />changing Clause 24 of the CC&Rs for Matadero Creek. <br />MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Hillestad, seconded by Allison and passed <br />unanirtnusly to adopt Resolution #1442 approving "Amendment to declaration imposing <br />conditions, covenants, restrictions, easements and agreements" upon Tract No. 7187, <br />entitled "Matadero Creek Subdivision" and authorizing execution thereof, and the <br />recordation thereof. <br />For purposes of clarification, Proft asked that the minutes be raroved from the <br />Consent Calendar for the meeting of June 2, 1982 and considered for approval at <br />this time. <br />MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Allison, seconded by van Tamelen and passed <br />4b, by the following roll call vote to approve the minutes of June 2, 1982. <br />AYES: Mayor Perkins, Councilmenbers Allison, Proft and van Tanelen <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT; Hillestad <br />A discussion followed on the preliminary site review for Lot 12 which had been <br />conducted by the Site Development Committee and reported on in a memo to Council <br />dated 6/15/82. <br />MYTION FAILED DUE TO LACK OF A SECOND: Moved by Allison to accept the findings of <br />the Site Development Nnmittee. <br />The procedure of the pre-bid review as introduced at the meeting of 6/2/82 was <br />discussed and clarified. It was noted that regarding this process, the findings <br />of the Site Development Committee would be final unless appealed. Council would <br />not be involved in the decision-making process but would have the opportunity to <br />appeal if it wished. <br />Mr. James Viso, bidder, addressed the Council and explained his understanding of <br />the pre-bid process, what he was requesting and what the findings were of his meeting <br />with the Site Development Committee. <br />The City Council then adjourned to Closed Session for Litigation at 8:45 p.m. and <br />reconvened at 8:55 p.m. <br />-2- <br />