Laserfiche WebLink
CITY ODUNCIL MIN[R'ES - September 1, 1982 <br />F. GENERAL ORDERS AND uNFINISHED BUSINESS (continued): <br />%W 1. Lands of Riggin, File TM #2095-79 (continued) <br />before Council for their consideration. Due to this possible misunderstanding, <br />Council agreed to hear the applicant's request although it had not been scheduled <br />on tle agenda. <br />Mr. Jon Blake, applicant, addressed the Council noting that he had paid his fees <br />and had ;ul ated plans showing the road profile. As shown on the plans the grade <br />of the driveway was reduced to no more than 208 except in an area of approximately <br />200' where it approached 258. Mr. Blake ommented that he held an option on the <br />property and would exercise that option if the plans were approved. He further <br />stated that negotiations with the adjacent property owners had been discussed as a <br />possibility; however, he had opted at this time not to pursue that option. <br />MDTION SEODM D ASID CARRIED: Moved by Proft, seoonded by Allison and passed by <br />the following roll call vote to deny the request for a change in the approved <br />Tentative Map for the Lands of Riggin, File TM #2095-79. <br />AYES: Mayor Perkins and Councih nbers Allison, Proft and van Tamelen <br />WES: Councilwoman Hillestad <br />Proft stated the following six reasons for denying the request for the change in <br />the approved Tentative Map for Lands of Riggin: 1) There is an approved Tentative <br />Map on file. 2) The approved Tentative Map has a driveway which does not exceed <br />208 and is in accordance with the Town's ordinances. 3) The approved driveway <br />rr entrance's configuration maximizes safety and reduces the nuisance factor to the <br />adjoining property owners. 4) The requested maps have a portion of the driveway <br />which exceeds 208 and is contrary to the Town's ordinances. 5) The requested <br />driveway entrance configurations do not have the attributes of safety nor the <br />neighbors' support, and 6) Because of the uniqueness of the parcel in terms of <br />driveway configuration (length, entry to Chapparal and location of neighbors' <br />house) the request for an exception to the 208 grade maximum is not warranted. <br />2. Status Report on S -Curve <br />The City Planner reported four specific items regarding the S -Curare: clean up <br />the brush, trees, etc.; fix guard rail; patch surface of path and fix white fence. <br />It appeared that the crew would have all of this work completed by Friday, 9/3/82, <br />except the fence. The City Planner did note that the work being done was to make <br />the path usable for this year and to do it in an inexpensive manner. This was not <br />a long-term improvement; additional work would have to be done next year. <br />3. Stop Sign - Hilltop/Hillview Drive <br />The City Planner had met with two of the property owners and would present a report <br />to Council at the next meeting. <br />G. MW BUSINESS: <br />1. Fire Hazards: In response to a request for clarification from Proft, the City <br />Attorney stated that if a resident is aware of a potential fire hazard, they <br />should report it to Tuan Hall. <br />