Laserfiche WebLink
CITY NUNCLL MINUTES - October 30, 1980 <br />C. <br />SPECIAL REPORTS (continued) <br />2. Reports of Pd Hoc CmTnittees: <br />a) Ptd Hoc Public Safety Study Cmnittee Report <br />Bruce Thrmpson Chairman of the Pd Hoc Camlittee, presented the Committee's <br />report regarding the tax initiative, dated October 21, 1980, to the Council. <br />In part this report stated: "In view of the fact that the city has commenced <br />proceedings to withdraw from the district (LOS Altos County Fire Protection <br />District) , the Pd Hoc CaMlittee hereby reoamerds that the town council oppose <br />the tax initiative and encourage residents of the town and district to do so <br />also. . The report went on to give the reasons for this recommendation <br />and a complete copy of this report is on file at Town Hall. Mr. Tlranpson <br />added one additional amment to his report. Since the report had been prepared, <br />Mr. Thompson had been informed that the Board of Supervisors was willing to <br />make certain guarantees to the Town; namely, the District would have autonomy <br />to run the District and would have the right to contract for it after 7/1/81. <br />Geraldine Steinber4 Board of Supervisors, addressed the Council in support of <br />the tax initiative (Measure Q). She emphasized that the passage of the tax <br />was critical; the County would not provide funds from the general fund for the <br />District and there was no guarantee that there was an alternative service. <br />Louis Straver, Estacada Way, Gerry Stewart aril <br />Support �of Measure Q, the tax initiative. They urged the Council as leaders <br />of the community to express their support of this measure. <br />Councilmanbers Hillestad and McReynolds noted that the Fire District had never <br />been under the Council's authority, rather it was under the authority of the <br />Board of Supervisors. Council had acted in a responsible way: surveys and <br />studies had been completed and a oammittee had been formed to study the matter. <br />After the election and the voters' decision, the issue will be further dis- <br />cussed. Councilman Perkins expressed serious concerns about the Pd Hoc <br />Public Safety Study Committee's report. He had hoped it wound be an objective <br />investigation of the situation, giving facts and alternatives. <br />YOTION SDtiIIDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Perkins, seconded by Hillestad and <br />passed by the following roll call vote to refer the interim report of the Ad <br />Hoc Public Safety Study Camdttee back to the Committee for then to provide <br />facts to substantiate their recormendations. <br />AYES: Coumcilmenbers Hillestad, Perkins and Proft <br />NOES: Mayor Nystrom and Councilman McReynolds <br />3. Reports from the Planning Caumission: <br />Planning Ccmnissioner van Tamelen noted that the Pathway Element for the General <br />Plan had been completed. <br />4. Presentations from the Floor: none <br />-2- <br />