Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - February I, 1978 <br />D. STAFF - REPORTS CORRESPONDENCE & ANNOUNCEMENTS: (Continued) <br />c) LANDS OF REISER (Continued) <br />MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: After clearing any legal ramifications, It was then <br />moved by Councilman Cheney, seconded by Councilman McReynolds and passed unanimously <br />by all members present to approve Applicant's request for time extension to com- <br />plete Subdivision Improvements (from February I, 1978) and to amend the last sen- <br />tence of Condition 2-(d) to read: The construction of this fire road shall result <br />In a 10' wide all weather crushed rock surface and shall link driveways as necessary <br />and shall be superimposed over driveways where possible. <br />E. SPECIAL ORDERS: <br />I. Ordinance for Introduction (corrected from Agenda) - Relating to organized <br />jogging on public rights-of-way. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Hillestad outlined the procedures to follow, asking for audience <br />cooperation and a five minute time limit on speakers. The City Manager then gave <br />a brief background on the subject draft Ordinance, telling of the complaints received <br />about mass jogging along Moody Road, the blind curves and dangers involved and the <br />State law prohibiting such activity. He further stated it was not Council's Intent <br />to ban jogging, but rather to legalize the Fun Runs and provide controls. Councilman <br />McReynolds told of problems In enforcing speed limits along Moody, traffic -congestion <br />caused by It's link between Skyline and I.S. 280 and welcomed recommendations to re- <br />solve this issue to everyone's satisfaction. Councilman Proft stated his Involvement <br />In requesting the Ordinance, his efforts in talking with those Involved In the Fun <br />Runs to ease the acute dangers when they first became evident, his inability to <br />arrive at solutions to the problems and subsequent bringing of this item before <br />Council as a last resort. Councilman Cheney felt this matter could be taken care <br />of without legislation and, when the joggers fall to act courteously and obey laws,. <br />they should immediately be cited by the Sheriff's office. <br />Thereafter, the hearing was opened to the public with the following speaking against <br />the Ordinance. <br />Mr. Green. Attorney, referenced a legal rebuttal he had prepared and suggested <br />stricter enforcement of current laws. <br />Mr. Anderson, Fun Run Organizer, opposed any further restrictions and told of cau- <br />tioning the runners each Sunday morning of safety regulations and the change In <br />time from 10:30 to 9:30 after his discussion with Councilman Proft. He felt that <br />the placement of directional signs, lanes and policing should be handled by the <br />Town and, moving the Runs to Foothill College tracks would take much of the enjoy- <br />ment out of them. He also stressed the fact that these events had been held for <br />five years without an accident. <br />Mr. Earnest Diane Drive,expressedhis confusion for the need to write another law <br />when a current law Is being violated. <br />Mr. Nicholson Resident, suggested that, for the short duration of the Sunday Runs, <br />autos be blocked from that portion of Moody Road and then Introduced his physician. <br />Mr. Besson, Los Altos, cited the reverse trend In heart disease prevalent today and <br />Los Altos H1115' opportunity to lead the country in supporting and promoting joggers. <br />He felt that restricting or abolishing the Sunday Fun Runs would remove motivation <br />L and discourage many who sorely needed this form of exercise. <br />-3- <br />