Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - April 12, 1976 <br />ADOBE CREEK COUNTRY CLUB USE P_RiJTT Co-rt'di: <br />Mr. Zoller also suggested that the recommendation with reference to the <br />split road for the purpose on ingress and egress would interfere with existing <br />landscaping, and this decision might also be deferred until the yearly re- <br />view of the Use Permit for dateradnation at that time. <br />Mr. Zoller disagreed with the recommendation of the City Engineer relative to <br />the paving of all parking areas and returning lot V. which would not be <br />needed for parking, to its natural state thrrugh landscaping. He felt that <br />lot #7 would return to its natural state without the Club's landscaping the <br />area in a short period of time if it was not used for additional parking. Mr. <br />Zoller also thought the parking areas could remain natural or gravel rather <br />than paving all the areas. <br />Speaking from the Floor: <br />Mrs. T. Schick, Weston Road2 Planning Commissiorcr: Commented that the <br />Conenission had worked on the conditions, 'out hap rr_rer seen a final copy of <br />the Use Permit as granted by the City Council. Also fait ti,it the paving of <br />the parking areas should be required for the safety of Club members. <br />In response to the Mayor, City Manager Robert Crova stated that copies of the <br />final Use Permit had not been reproduced for the Commission and various Te,:.,n <br />4W Committees; however, they had been informed that an approved copy was available <br />at Town Hall if they wished to review it. <br />Mr. Gillio also commented on the Town's liability resoensibilites as it <br />pertained to private property. <br />Plannin i Commission Chairman J. Carico: Stated that fir. Crowe had informed her <br />that a copy of the se Permit was available for the Coimnission's review if <br />they desired. <br />Mr. Thomas f4cRevnolds, Moody Road: Did not believe the On -Site circulation <br />p an was adequate as submitted, and did not feel Council would be able to <br />enforce it if it were approved as it now stood. <br />Councilman Proft addressed Council regarding many discrepancies in the plot <br />plan as presented to Council. He stated that there was a disparity between <br />the map and actual measurements of the rcaoways; the plan d1d not show the <br />water tank on the site or the location of one of the structures. He felt <br />that many questions were still unanswered this evening. <br />Discussion between Staff and Council er.sr!Pd regarding the plot plan as sub- <br />mitted by the ar:licant. <br />Councilman Proft moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hillestad, that, prior to <br />the Council's acceptance of the requirements of Items "f" and "g" of the <br />Conditional Use Farmit, a plot plan be drawn by a Civil Engineer at a scale <br />of 1" + 201, which adheres to the foilowinq sections of the Municipal Code: <br />-2- <br />