Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - November 22, 1976 <br />4W TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT REPORT (Cont'd): <br />Supervisor Steinberg noted that no decision had been made to this point <br />regarding Light Rail; that the Study had just been completed and the <br />Transportation District wished to present the study to all the cities for <br />their comments and recommendations before any action was taken. She <br />noted that by 1990 it was projected that there would be a 50% increase in <br />the number of daily trips, or six million daily trips by auto within the <br />County. Supervisor Steinberg outlined the choices the County had with <br />regard to public transportation: expand the present highway system; <br />increase the present bus system; buy more urban land to control growth; <br />or build a transportation system to accommodate the demand. She commented <br />that no action from Council was expected this evening, but hoped that by <br />the end of the year the District could receive comments on the study. <br />Mr. James Pott, Director of the Transportation District, Mr. Lou Montini, <br />Deputy Director, and Mr. Dave Minster of the Agency, outlined the five <br />corridors within the County which had been chosen for the study, and the <br />various types of light rail which could be utilized. Mr. Pott also clarified <br />that the study did not conclude with any recommendations; that its purpose <br />had been to furnish technical information so that a policy could be <br />established. It was noted that if the County opted to proceed with building <br />a light rail transportation system and great amount of lead time would be <br />needed, and that such a system would not become operable until 1985. A <br />C cost comparison was also presented of alternative methods of transportation. <br />� <br />I After the presentation by the Agency, Mr. Pott responded to questions from <br />members of the Public and the City Council relative to the costs of the <br />system. Because the Transportation District was requesting comments and <br />recommendations to assist them in their Decision, Council concensus was <br />that the Report should be studied further and the matter given more time. <br />Council agreed to schedule the matter for further study at their second <br />meeting in December, so that comments and suggestions could be provided as <br />requested. <br />Councilman Grabowski moved, seconded by Councilwoman Hillestad, to endorse <br />the concept of a light rail system for Santa Clara County as presented in <br />the DeLeuw-Cather Report. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: <br />AYE: Councilmen Brown, Grabowski, Proft, Councilwoman Hillestad <br />NO: Mayor Cheney <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />2. Reports of Standing Committees: None <br />3. Reports of Ad Hoc Committees: None <br />4. Presentations from the Floor: None <br />v -2 <br />