05/15/1974 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15, 1974 Councilman Cheney inquired as to what crnnpellinq reason existed that changed the Planning Commission's view that fourteen horses were the maximum number to be permitted under the former use permit. Commissioner Spencer addressed Council regarding improvements which had been made to the property by the new owner. Discussion ensued regarding the hardships on the road as a result of increa3ed veAcular traffic, the ability of the land to accommodate more horses, the vagueness of the words in some of the conditions, and the concern that not all property owners in the area were notified of the Public Hearing. Several motions were made by Council that were declared moot when they failed to get appropriate consent. After further discussion, Councilman McReynolds moved that the matter be referred back to the Picnning Commission for further study, that all neighbors on Nermandy Court, O'Keefe Lane, and La Rena Drive be notified, and that the Planninc Commission report back to Council with their findings. Cuuircilman Cheney seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved by Ccuncil. ITEMS REMAINING ON CONSENT CALENDAR: 3. Motions for Adoption: a) Motion setting June 5, 19?4 as date for Public Hearing on Division of Asse:scant #235, S.A.D. #9, H. Broekhoff. 4, b) Approved building site request, Lands of Woodward (Robleda Road), with conditions r3cwaended by Staff and amended by the Commission. John Riley, Engineer, File #BSA 6016-74. c) Approved Variance request of W. Warren, Triangle Assoc. for five foot reduction for construction of a family room, File #V-7007-74. MOTION SECONDED AND CARkIED: Councilwoman Miller moved, seconded by Counc'amran McReynolds and unanimously carried to adopt the Items on the CONSEMT CALENDAR as amended. C. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR: 1. Mr. Jack Beiove, Elise Court: Spoke regarding building site approval on property owned by Mr. Azavedo. His primary concern was his water line which went across this property. He also stated that there was a barn located within ten feet of his property line in violation of the Municipal Code. Mr. Belove had discussed these problems with the City Manager and two members of the City Council prior to the meeting, and discussion ensued regarding questions raised previously as to the expiration date of the building site approval, the recorded map for the Azevedo property which did not show the water line easement, nor the existence of a structure on the property. -2-