Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - October 16, 1974 <br />44W 'e <br />CONSENT CALENDAR (cont'd): <br />5. Resolutions for Adoption: <br />a) Resolution #824 ordering reduction on Assessment #370, S.A.D.#9. <br />b) Resolution #825 ordering reduction on Assessment #555, S.A.D. #9 <br />ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION: <br />1. Approval of Minutes: October 3, 1974 (Regular Meeting) <br />Mr. Steve McReynolds, Foody Court, requested that his statement on page <br />4 of the Minutes be clarified, in that he had requested that the name of <br />Moody Court be retained. <br />3. Actions of Variance & Permit Commission: <br />b) Approved variance for reduction of side yard, Lands of Manolakos, <br />(File #V7010-74). <br />Councilwoman Miller questioned the reason for a variance on this <br />home and why the owners were asking for a variance so soon after the <br />home was built. <br />6W Council questioned whether the State requirements for the granting of <br />a variance existed in this case. After discussion between Staff and <br />Council, consensus was to appeal this decision of the Planning <br />Commission and set the date for a public hearing for November 20, 1974. <br />4. Actions of Planning Commission: <br />a) Approved Tentative Subdivision Map, Lands of Stedman, Bahl Homes, <br />Developer, subject to conditions recommended in approved check <br />list (File #TM392-72). <br />Because the applicant had submitted an appeal to Council for the <br />amendment of certain conditions on the approved check listwhich, <br />had not been received in time for Council review, Mr. Bahl was asked <br />if he had any objections to scheduling this item for hearing on <br />November 6, 1974. The applicant so consented. <br />b) Recommended exemption from building moratorium, Stonebrook #2, <br />Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints (File #2010-74). <br />Councilman Cheney questioned the logic behind the granting of this <br />exemption from the building moratorium when one that appeared to be of <br />a similar nature was refused by the Planning Commission several weeks <br />ago. Council consensus was to appeal the decision of the Planning <br />Commission and scheduled the item for hearing at their meeting of <br />r4► November 20, 1974. <br />-2- <br />