Laserfiche WebLink
2. Motion approving tentative subdivision map of Edgerton Cooley (396-72) 10 <br />lots, 20.54 gross acres located on Edgerton Road as recommended by the <br />%W Planning Commission on February 28, 1973. <br />Councilman Miller questioned the lack of provision for horse paths in the <br />internal subdivision. <br />Speaking from the floor: Mr. Robert Stutz, Chairman of the Pathway Committee, <br />stated that the Pathway Committee's feeling on this <br />matter is that paths should be open to all uses. <br />Mr. James Muncie spoke in favor of making paths <br />available to horsemen within the subdivision. <br />Mr. John Riley, Engineer for the Edgerton Cooley <br />subdivision, stated that the subdivision had 23s <br />acres of horse paths and scenic easements which <br />were thought to be sufficient. <br />Commissioner Spencerspoke of the fault running through the subdivision and of <br />the major improvements made in the subdivision as suggested by the Planning <br />Commission. The Planning Commission's feeling on the matter is that the <br />horse trails running the perimeter of the subdivision are adequate. <br />Discussion followed regarding the possible ramifications to potential buyers <br />of property within the subdivision with reference to the fault. A study of <br />the activity or inactivity of the fault would take a great deal of time and <br />oar there is not much that can be done in the way of informing prospective buyers <br />as to the existence of this fault. <br />Speaking from the floor: Mr. David Jansson <br />Mr. Robert Stutz stated the contention of the Path- <br />way Committee that the paths in the subdivision <br />were adequate. <br />lkw <br />Councilman Davey complimented Mr. Cooley and his Engineer on contributing 50' <br />wide easements to the subdivision for horse paths and on their nearly perfect <br />subdivision. She stated, however, that the check list should be amended to <br />require multi-purpose use of internal routes so that cyclists, pedestrians, <br />horses, etc. might avail themselves of the paths within the subdivision. She <br />stated that the no horse domicile limitation was unfortunate and should be <br />taken up in another arena. <br />MOTION, SECONDED AND CARRIED: Councilman Davey moved, seconded by Councilman <br />Grabowski and carried unanimously with Councilman Kubby absent that the sub- <br />division be approved with the inclusion of multi-purpose paths pursuant to <br />the recommendation of the Pathway Committee. <br />Speaking from the floor: Mrs. Diane Strobele spoke to the need for more ade- <br />quate pathways in a "horse town". <br />Mr. A.M. Laws <br />-2- <br />