05/01/1972 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

NOTE: Since the agenda for May lot was only partially discussed at this May lot i meeting and the balance was discussed at regular adjourned meeting on 410 May 2nd, coupled with the fact that items were discussed out of the sequence shown on the agenda and all Councilmen were not present at theMay 2nd meetings the separate recorded minutes of May 1 and 2 are prepared in the sequence of the agenda for clarity and items are cross-referenced in each set of minutes. SCHEDULED ITEM NO. 1: MOVING OF ROAD EASEMENT AND CHANGE IN LOT LINE BETWEEN G. HINTON AND R.E. NC CANN - BUENA VISTA DRIVE. GRANT VARIANCE FOR EXISTING STRUCTURES (LLC -4-72 and V-367-12). Staff reviewed the Planning Commission discussion of April 28, 1972 and their recom- mended approval of this lot change and variance which would move the road easement to encompass the long -existing road, thus realigning the property lines. Approval of the lot line change created the need for a variance since three existing strut - tures on the Hinton property and one on the McCann property then encroached into the setbacks of their new front property lines. Council concurred. MOTION, SECONDED AND CARRIED: Councilman Davey moved, seconded by Miller and carried unanimously that the request of R.E. McCann for a Lot Line Change (LLC -4-72) and Variance (V.-367-72) be approved in accordance with the Check List dated April 24, 1972. SCHEDULED ITEM NO. 2: REPORT ON PENDING LEGISLATIVE MATTERS -- Councilman Grabowski. Councilman Grabowski requested and Council concurred to continue this item to the ISay 15th meeting. SCHEDULED ITEM NO. 3: DISCUSSION OF TOWN'S SEWER POLICY. Mayor Helgesson stated he felt there was considerable misunderstanding as to the meaning of Resolution No. 458 (as amended by Resolution No. 469) which defines the Town Sewer Policy. He then read both of the resolutions in entirety. Before opening discussion to the audience, the Mayor noted that discussions of sewers within the Town have historically been an emotional issue and therefore he requested all speakers limit their coaments to whether they favored Resolution No. 458 or opposed it. Council discussion with participation by the City Attorney and Mz. A.H. Laws, 11210 Hooper Lane, clarified that the Council could, following the discussion, take action if a majority wished to do so. Floor participants speaking in favor of Resolution No. 458 included: Nmes: F. Fava, A. Boissevain, P. Standring, J. Carico, H.L. Schick, L. Foster, A. McReynolds, K. Ward, S. Smith, A. Spencer, M. Gallo and D. Sukiennicki. Messrs: A.M. Laws, 0. Sobel, R. Poole, J. Quimby, B. Hall, B. Kirkpatrick, J.D. Dochnahl, and W. Downey. A Los Altos Hills Association letter favoring retention of the policy was also read. Floor participants speaking in opposition to Resolution No. 458 included: ";.nes: F. Olgiatti, M. Muncie, L. Katz, and L. Abrahams. Messrs: D. Janson, G. browning, -,� 0. Buneman, G. Ferrari, M. Katz, and J. haling.