Laserfiche WebLink
SCHEDULED ITERS NO. 2: <br />REQUEST FOR REAR ANU SIDE YARD VARIANCES (V-375-72) TO A HA%InUH OF 15' WITHIN <br />THE EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINES FOR TENNIS COURT AMD 12' HIGH FENCE <br />WITHIN SETBACKS AT 12720 DIANNE DRIVE. APPLICANT: DR. MICHAEL E. NORTHCUTT. <br />Staff presented the report and summarized the action of the Planning Commission. <br />The Planning Commission has recommended approval with the following conditions: <br />1. There may be lighting for the tennis court, but all lights must be out after <br />10:00 P.1. <br />2. All tennis court lights must be shielded to prevent shedding of light on <br />adjacent property owners. <br />3. Reasonable landscaping to soften lines of the court, as aporoved by the Site <br />Development Committee. <br />MOTION. SECONDED A'ID CARRIED: Councilman Davey moved, seconded by Kubby, and <br />carried by majority roll call vote to approve the variance with the conditions <br />as recommended by the Planning Comnission. Councilman Grabowski and Mayor <br />Helgesson voted "No". <br />SCHEDULED ITEM NO. 3: <br />TE-f4TAT_1TE MAP OF !IRS. ELSIE WRIGHT (388-72) 2 LOTS, 12.2±a., ELE"lA AT NAT01% <br />ROAD. ENGR. P. NOWACK. <br />Staff reviewed the application, noting the conditions of the check list, and the <br />unanimous recommendation for approval of the Planning <br />ao <br />ningCommissin. Duringnge Council <br />review, it was suggested that Item 4 (a) -"pahabe amended to <br />word <br />"will" to read "may". <br />MOTION, SECONDED AND CARRIED: Councilman Davey moved, seconded by Grabowski and <br />carried by unanimous vote to approve this application with the above mentioned <br />change in Item 4 (a) of the check list. <br />SCHEDULED ITEM NO. 4 <br />TffP-N - UDGET. <br />The City l entered <br />Attorneysked litigation <br />theession before the Council adjournedCtonaiinto <br />litigation <br />session. <br />Council reconvened to regular session to take up discussion on the budget for <br />1972-73. <br />The City Manager reviewed the proposed budget, noting that it is out of balance <br />by $41,000. and indicating that by increasing the revenues and decreasing expendi- <br />tures, the budget could be balanced. He reviewed the July 28, 1972, memorandum <br />to the City Council, in which he made recommendations on the balancing of the <br />budget. He indicated increasing anticipated revenues by $33,520. and cutting <br />1r expenditures by $9,045. During discussion of the different budget items, the City <br />Council concurred that the funds budgeted last year, but not spent for legal <br />expenses (De La Raza suit) be earmarked for use, if needed, to continue the defense <br />of the Town's zoning ordinance. <br />-3- <br />