HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 3.2TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS August 11, 2005
Staff Report to the Planning Commission
RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A NEW AGRICULTURAL BUILDING;
LANDS OF HITZ; 26026 SCARFF WAY; FILE #80-05-ZP-SD.
FROM: Brian Froelich, Assistant Planner
APPROVED BY: Carl Cahill, Planning Director C. L' .
That the Planning Commission:
Approve the requested Site Development Permit subject to the conditions of approval in
Attachment 1.
SUMMARY
The applicant requests Site Development approval to add a new 2,710 square foot
agricultural building on the north side of the property and remove an existing 438 square
foot shed. The project includes a driveway extension of approximately 250 feet, a new
240 square foot deck, and a bocce ball court.
BACKGROUND
The subject 10.547 acre property is located at the end of Scarff Way. The large property is
surrounded on three sides by subdivided residential properties and Esther Clark Park
borders the rear of the property. Two dwellings currently exist on the site. The main
residence built in 1938 and a secondary dwelling unit built in the 1950's. An accessory
shed building (438 square feet) exists onsite that serves the current agricultural functions
of the property. The site contains several acres of orchards, vineyards, gardens, and has a
variety of screening vegetation. A 10 foot wide public utilities easement runs through the
property that facilitates several joint poles. The property is populated with one heritage
oak tree (double 6" trunk) located in proximity to the proposed improvements.
The proposed use and structure are permitted in the R -A zoning district per Section 10-
1.702 (f). As required by Section 10-2.301 (C) (4) of the Site Development Code, this
application for a structure exceeding 500 square feet and 19 feet in height has been
forwarded to the Planning Commission for review. Criteria for review from the Site
Development Code include grading, drainage, building siting, pathways, landscape
screening and outdoor lighting. Zoning Code review encompasses compliance with floor
and development area limitations, height, setbacks, and parking requirements.
Planning Commission
Lands of Him
August 11, 2005
Page 2 of 9
DISCUSSION
The proposed building would serve the agricultural uses for storage of equipment,
harvested, and for processing. The lower level of the building contains a pull through
garage, tractor storage stall, and cold storage room. The upper level contains an office and
a garden shed room.
The proposed building site lies in the existing public utilities easement. The applicant has
provided documentation showing a proposed new easement to be relocated in an effort to
underground the existing facilities onsite. The project has been conditioned such that the
applicant must provide letters of consent from the utility companies prior to acceptance of
building plans and the new easement must be recorded and the existing easement
abandoned prior to issuance of building permits.
Site Data:
Gross Lot Area:
10.547 acres
Net Lot Area:
10.547 acres
Average Slope:
17.8%
Lot Unit Factor:
8.778
Floor Area and
Development Area:
Area
Maximum Proposed
Existing
Increase Leff
Development
105,900 46,708
35,227
+7,833 50,000+
Floor
49,231 12,299
10,454
+2,278 35,000+
Height and Visibility
The proposed agricultural building is sited on one of the highest points of the property but
is lowered into the hilltop minimizing the visibility of the structure. The building pad is
cut into the hill to create a partial basement on the lower level. The proposed structure
height measures 20' 6" at its highest measurement from grade and has an overall highest
to lowest measurement of approximately 30 feet. A row of large eucalyptus trees help
screen the proposed building location from the ridgeline homes to the west.
Setbacks
The proposed building is located at the minimum 30 foot side yard setback relative to the
northern property line. The remaining front, rear, and side setback minimums are
exceeded by over 200 feet.
Planning Commission
Lands of Hitt
August 11, 2005
Page 3 of 9
Lighting and Landscavin
No skylights are proposed on the roof of the new building. Proposed building mounted
lighting includes two fixtures at the main entrance and one fixture at each of the other
building exits. No new landscape lighting is proposed.
Trees
One heritage oak tree (6" double trunk) is located in proximity to the proposed deck. A
condition of approval is included requiring an arborist report be submitted with the
building plans to ensure mitigation and construction methods that will not negatively
impact the tree. An arborist report was not required with the site development review
because the applicant is flexible regarding the final location of the deck and intends to
preserve the tree.
Three pepper trees (6", 8", and 10") are proposed to be removed with the construction of
the new building.
Drivewav and Parkin
The proposal does not require any additional parking; however, two new legal sized (10'
x 20') covered spaces are created in the garage of the proposed building. A section of
paved driveway approximately 250 feet long is proposed from the end of the existing
driveway tum around to provide vehicular access to the proposed building.
Grading and Drainage
The Engineering Department has reviewed the plans and has recommended conditions of
approval as specified in Attachment 1. Originally, the applicant had proposed six (6) feet
cut and a six (6) foot retaining wall adjacent to the garage roll up door. This would have
required an exception to the grading policy (max cut 4 feet). The applicant has stepped
the cut and redesigned the wall to include two staggered walls. The current plan complies
with the Town's grading policy. Proposed grading quantities for the project include 670
cubic yards of cut, 20 cubic yards of fill, and 650 cubic yards to be spread around the site.
The proposed drainage for the site involves a series of area drains that carry water away
from the new building and into a detention chamber followed by an energy dissipater
located over 30 feet from the northern property line. The final drainage will be reviewed
by the Engineering Department prior to final inspection of the residence per conditions of
approval.
Planning Commission
Lands of Hiu
August 11, 2005
Page 4 of 9
Geotechnical Report
The subject property has a slope of 17.8% and a geotechnical report was required with the
proposal. The Town's geotechnical consultant, Cotton, Shires & Associates, reviewed the
report and recommended standard conditions of approval (attachment 1).
Sewer
The property owner has proposed to connect the new building to the Palo Alto sewer
basin. The Engineering Department has included conditions of approval requiring the
applicant to obtain a sewer connection permit prior to submittal for building plan check
and the connection be completed prior to final inspection.
Fire Department
A fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout all portions of the building.
The new driveway is not required to be accessible for fire engine access.
CONCLUSION
The property owner currently utilizes a 438 square foot shed for the purpose of
maintaining several acres of orchards, vineyards, and gardens. The proposed agricultural
building would enhance and support the agricultural use of the site beyond the capacity of
the existing shed. The proposal meets all code and policy requirements.
ATTACHMENTS
I. Recommended conditions of approval
2. Cotton, Shires & Associates, Inc., Geotechnical comments, dated June 2, 2005
3. Architect summary of site, use, and proposal
4. Neighbor support letters
5. Project plans (Commission only)
cc: Noel F. Cross
307 Orchard City Drive #107
Campbell, CA 95008
Planning Commission
Lands of thu
August 11, 2005
Page 5 of 9
ATTACHMENT 1
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FOR A SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
FOR A NEW AGRICULTURAL BUILDING AND DRIVEWAY EXTENSION
LANDS OF HITZ, 26026 SCARFF WAY
File #80-05-ZP-SD
A. PLANNING DEPARTMENT:
1. Construction plans shall conform to the plans on file in the Planning
Division for Appl. No. 80-05-ZP-SD. The Planning Director may approve
minor modifications to the plans. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy for the building, planning staff shall inspect and confirm all
building and site improvements are constructed in compliance with these
project plans.
2. The facility shall not be used for any commercial operations or sales. Wine
tasting and other gatherings open to the public are further prohibited.
3. A certified arborist shall prepare and submit a report on the health of the
heritage double 6' oak tree, comment on the proposed deck construction
and recommend mitigation measures prior to acceptance of plans for
building plan check.
4. Prior to beginning any grading operation or demolition, all significant trees
are to be fenced at the drip line. The 6 -foot chain link fencing shall clearly
delineate the drip line. Town staff must inspect the fencing and the trees
to be fenced prior to approval of any demolition or grading permit. The
property owner shall call for said inspection at least three days in advance
of the inspection. The fence must remain throughout the course of
construction and the construction crew shall pay special attention to the
care of the existing trees. No storage of equipment, vehicles, or debris
shall be allowed within the drip lines of the fenced trees.
5. Additional landscaping may be required. Staff will visit the site prior to
final inspection to determine if any plantings will be needed to screen the
new building or to restore areas disturbed by grading or construction. A
public hearing may be required for review of a landscape screening plan. If
additional screening is required all plantings shall be installed prior to
final inspection.
6. Fire retardant roofing (Class A) is required for all new construction
Planning Commission
Lands of Hitz
August 11, 2005
Page 6 of 9
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT:
Two copies of a final grading and drainage plan shall be submitted for
review and approval by the Engineering Department prior to acceptance
of plans for building plan check. The final grading and drainage plan
shall show the sewer service for the basement level, including pump
system and point of connection. Final drainage and grading shall be
inspected by the Engineering Department and any deficiencies corrected to
the satisfaction of the Engineering Department prior to final inspection.
A letter shall be submitted from the project engineer stating that the site
grading and drainage improvements were installed as shown on the
approved plans prior to final inspection.
Two copies of an erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted for
review and approval by the Engineering Department prior to acceptance
of plans for building plan check. The contractor and the property owner
shall comply with all appropriate requirements of the Town's NPDES
permit relative to grading and erosiontsediment control. The first 100 feet
of the driveway shall be rocked during construction and all cut and fill
slopes shall be protected from erosion. All areas on the site that have the
native soil disturbed shall be protected for erosion control during the rainy
season and shall be replanted prior to final inspection.
9. Two copies of a grading and construction operation plan shall be
submitted by the property owner for review and approval by the City
Engineer and Planning Director prior to acceptance of plans for building
plan check. The grading/construction operation plan shall address truck
traffic issues regarding dust, noise, and vehicular and pedestrian traffic
safety on Scarff Way and surrounding roadways, storage of construction
materials, placement of sanitary facilities, parking for construction
vehicles, clean-up area, and parking for construction personnel. A debris
box (trash dumpster) shall be placed on site for collection of construction
debris. Arrangements must be made with the Los Altos Garbage Company
for the debris box, since they have a franchise with the Town and no other
hauler is allowed within the Town limits.
10. The property owner shall inform the Town of any damage and shall repair
any damage caused by the construction of the project to pathways, private
driveways, and public and private roadways, prior to final inspection and
release of occupancy permits and shall provide the Town with
photographs of the existing conditions of the roadways and pathways prior
to acceptance of plans for building plan check.
11. The property owner shall submit approval letters from the utility
companies regarding the relocation of the easement prior to submittal of
Planning Commission
Lands of Nit.
August 11, 2005
Page 7 of 9
building plan check. The property owner shall submit a recorded
document of the new easement to Town prior to issuance of building
permit.
12. Any, and all, changes to the approved grading and drainage plan shall be
submitted as revisions from the project engineer and shall first be
approved by the Town Engineering Department. No grading shall take
place during the grading moratorium (November 1 to April 1) except with
prior approval from the City Engineer. No grading shall take place within
ten feet of any property line except to allow for the construction of the
driveway access.
13. All public utility services serving this property shall be placed
underground.
14. At the time of foundation inspection for the new agricultural accessory
building and prior to final inspection, the location and elevation of the
new building shall be certified in writing by a registered civil engineer or
licensed land surveyor as being in/at the approved location and elevation
shown on the approved Site Development plan. At the time of framing
inspection for the new building, the height of each building shall be
similarly certified as being at the height shown on the approved Site
Development plan.
15. The driveway shall be required to be fully constructed prior to final
inspection.
16. The property owner shall be required to connect to the public sanitary
sewer prior to final inspection. A sewer hook-up permit shall be required
by the Town's Public Works Department for the new building prior to
submittal ofp/ans for building plan check.
17. The applicant shall pay a pathway fee of $46.00 per linear foot of average
lot width. The fee shall be paid prior to acceptance of plans for building
plan check.
18. As recommended by Cotton, Shires & Associates in their report dated June
2, 2005, the applicant shall comply with the following:
1. Geotechnical Plan Review — The Project
Geotechnical Consultant shall review and approve all
geotechnical aspects of the project building and
grading plans (i.e., site preparation and grading, site
drainage improvements and design parameters for
foundations, retaining walls and driveway) to ensure
Planning Commission
Lands of Hiu
August 11, 2005
Page 8 of 9
that their recommendations have been properly
incorporated.
The location and design of proposed energy
dissipaters should be addressed from a slope
stability/erosion perspective.
The results of the plan review should be summarized by the Project
Geotechnical Consultant in a letter and submitted to the Town
Engineer for review and approval prior to acceptance of plans for
building plan check.
b. Geotechnical Field Inspection — The Project Geotechnical
Consultant shall inspect, test (as needed), and approve all
geotechnical aspects of the project construction. The
inspections should include, but not necessarily be limited to:
site preparation and grading, site surface and subsurface
drainage improvements, and excavations for foundations and
retaining walls prior to the placement of steel and concrete.
The results of these inspections and the as -built conditions of the
project shall be described by the geotechnical consultant in a letter and
submitted to the Town Engineer for review prior to final (granting of
occupancy) project approval.
C. FIRE DEPARTMENT:
19. An automatic residential fire sprinkler system approved by the Santa Clara
County Fire Department shall be included in the new building. Three sets
of plans prepared by a sprinkler contractor shall be submitted to the
Planning Department and approved by the Fire Department, prior to
issuance of building permit, and the sprinklers shall be inspected and
approved by the Fire Department, prior to final inspection.
D. BUII-DING DEPARTMENT:
20. All properties must pay School District fees to either the Los Altos School
District or the Palo Alto Unified School District, as applicable, before
receiving their building permit from Los Altos Hills. The applicant must
take a copy of Worksheet #2 to school district offices (both the elementary
and high school offices in the Los Altos School District), pay the
appropriate fees and provide the Town with a copy of their receipts.
Planning Commission
lands of Him
August 11, 2005
Page 9 of 9
Upon completion of the construction, a final inspection shall be required to be set with
the Planning and Engineering Departments at least two weeks prior to final building
inspection approval.
CONDITION NUMBERS 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, AND 17 SHALL BE COMPLETED
AND SIGNED OFF BY THE PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR PLAN CHECK
BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
NOTE: The Site Development permit is valid for one year from the approval date (until
August 11, 2006). All required building permits must be obtained within that year and
work on items not requiring a building permit shall be commenced within one year and
completed within two years.
COTTON, SHIRES & ASSOCIATES, INC. ATTACHMENTZ
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
June 2, 2005
L0105A
TO: Brian Froelich
Planning Department
Town of Los Altos Hills
26379 Fremont Rd.
Los Altos Hills, CA 94022
SUBJECT: Supplemental Geotechnical Peer Review
RE: Hitz, Agricultural Accessory Building
#80-05-ZP-SD-GD
26026 Scarff Way
At your request, we have completed a supplemental geotechnical peer review of
the application for proposed site improvements using:
Geotechnical Investigation (report) prepared by GeoForensics,
dated April 18, 2005.
In addition, we have reviewed pertinent technical documents from our office files
and completed recent site inspection.
DISCUSSION
The applicant proposes to construct a new two-story agricultural accessory
building and office with basement. Construction of a new driveway is proposed to
extend from the northern end of the existing driveway. In our previous review report
(dated May 23, 2005), we recommended that a project geotechnical investigation be
completed as a basis for project design prior to acceptance of documents for building
permit plan -check.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDED ACTION
Based on our review of the referenced report, it appears that the Project
Geotechnical Consultant has adequately characterized apparent site constraints and
recommended satisfactory geotechnical design criteria to address identified constraints.
Consequently, we recommend geotechnical approval of building permit issuance with the
following conditions:
Geotechnical Plan Review — The applicant's geotechnical
consultant shall review and approve all geotechnical aspects of
the project building and grading plans (i.e., site preparation and
grading, site drainage improvements and design parameters for
foundations, retaining walls and driveway) to ensure that their
recommendations have been properly incorporated.
• The location and design of proposed energy dissipaters should
be addressed from a slope stability /erosion perspective.
Northern Califomia Office Southern California Office
330 Village Lane 5245 Avenida Encinas • Suite A
Los Gatos, CA 95030-7218 Carlsbad, CA 92008-4374
(408) 354-5542 • Fax (408) 354-1852 (760) 931-2700 • Fax: (760) 931-1020
e-mail: losgatos@cottonshires.com www.cottonshires.com e-mail: earlsbad®cottonehires.com
Brian Froelich June 2, 2005
Page 2 L0105A
The results of the plan review should be summarized by the
geotechnical consultant in a letter and submitted to the Town
Engineer along with other documents for building permit plan -
check
2. Geotechnical Field Inspection — The geotechnical consultant shall
inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of
the project construction. The inspections should include, but not
necessarily be limited to: site preparation and grading, site surface
and subsurface drainage improvements, and excavations for
foundations and retaining walls prior to the placement of steel
and concrete.
The results of these inspections and the as -built conditions of the
project shall be described by the geotechnical consultant in.a letter
ands submitted to the Town Engineer for review prior to final (as -
built) project approval.
LIMITATIONS
This review has been performed to provide technical advice to assist the Town
with discretionary permit decisions. Our services have been limited to review of the
documents previously identified, and a visual review of the property. Our opinions and
conclusions are made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices of
the geotechnical profession. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties, either
expressed or implied.
DTS:TS:rb
Respectfully submitted,
COTTON, SHIRES AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
TOWN GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT
Ted Sayre
Supervising Engineering Geologist
CEG 1795
�
David T. Schrier
Supervising Geotechnical Engineer
GE 2334
COTTON, SHIRES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ATTACHMENT
April zo,zoos, Age,
NOEL F. CROSS
ARCHITECT AIA
Los Altos Hills Planning Commission
c/o Los Altos Hills Planning Department
26379 Fremont Road
Los Altos Hills, CA 94022 RECEIVED
RE: Proposed Agricultural Building/Accessory Structure APF.. 2 j 2005
per Los Altos Hills Municipal Code Section iii
26o26 Scarif Lane, Los Altos Hills, CA 94o22, TpWN0FL0SALT0SHWS
Dear Commission Members,
Per the request of the Planning Department staff, this letter provides a brief
summary of the existing property, its improvements, history, and current uses.
Also included is a summary of the description of activities, both those happening,
currently, as well as those anticipated once this proposed project is completed.
The subject parcel is 10.527 acres of gently sloping.orchards with two.existing homes,
and was purchased by the Hitz family about five years ago from the Scarff family.
The.original main residence, a single story Early Spanish California Colonial Revival'
style home of approx. 7,287 sq. ft. was built on the existing land in 1938 by of the
engineers of the Golden Gate Bridge: The secondary dwelling was originally built in
the 1950's as an 1,1oo sq. ft. Eichler, and was substantially remodeled in the mid- '
198o's to is current state; a one story ranch style home and attached two car garage
totaling 2,492 sq. ft. It currently serves as a residence for the full time caretaker of
the property, who was the Scarff's caretaker/gardener, and has lived on the property
continuously for the last 27 years.
In addition to these residential uses, the property's predominant use is agricultural in
nature. There are currently seven acres of mature apricot trees and one acre of grape
vines (planted five years ago in 2000), as well as miscellaneous minor crops,
ornamental horticulture, numerous mature shade trees; etc. Right now the only
existing support facility is an old garden shed (approx. 432 sq: ft.), which is quite.
inadequate. Given the significant ongoing farming operations, the proposed project
seeks to replace this small shed with an appropriately sized and outfitted
"barn"/accessory structure to properly support the ongoing tree farming, viticulture,
and personal hobby activities. No new activities are proposed, and all activities
conform with the "Agriculture" definition as listed in Los Altos Hills Municipal Code
Section 10-1.203• '
With regard to current and proposed agricultural activities and the resultant traffic,
noise and dust impacts, and parking requirements, please refer to the bullet points
below. Given the caretaker/gardener has been, is currently, and will remain anon -site
resident, no additional traffic or parking -requirements beyond those already required
for (and already provided by) the current residential uses are needed or anticipated.
The caretaker occasionally travels around the 1o+ acre site using a small Honda
"Rancher" to perform chores of irrigation, pump maintenance, tree/vine trimming,
planting, fertilization, gardening, etc., perhaps two to three days per week.
next page)
307 Orchard City Drive, n107 Campbell, CA 95oo8-1948 408.871.7600 fax 4.o8 87176o4, www.nfcarchitect.com
Hitz Agricultural Accessory Structure
April 20, 2005
Page 2 of 3
xisting.Baricultural Activities' -
• General Gardening Activities - daily
• Discing of orchards and fields by tractor— twice per year
• Auto Traffic (in addition to normal residential use) — two car trips/day - but
only usually on weekends - for a two week duration during each harvest
season (July for Apricots, September for grapes)
• Harvesting of Apricots —Mid July harvest lasts for about two weeks, usually
with family and friends invited over for a few weekend apricot picking and
drying parties
• Harvesting of Grapes — two weeks in September, includes collecting, sorting,
trimming, crushing, distilling, fermenting, and storage of viticulture for wine
making (for personal consumption only - within guidelines as defined by the
Federal B.A.T.F.)
• Deliveries by small truck— once per quarter (four times per year)
• Noise Impacts — negligible (tractors, power tools, etc. intermittently)
Proposed Agricultural Activities:
• No changes anticipated, except that many of these activities currently take
place in the existing garage of the main residence,.and the new structure will
allow the existing garage to be used for its original intent (parking cars)
Based on the topography of the property, this property has an average slope of
18.3% and an LUF of 8.531, as calculated by the project Civil Engineer Giuliani & Kull,
Inc. This translates to an MDA of 102,883.61 sq. ft., and an MFA of 48,336.90 sq. ft.
(please refer to the attached Town Worksheets). Neither of these parameters will
come into play for this proposed project. The proposed MDA is less than 50% of the
allowable, and the proposed MFA is roughly 25% of the allowable maximum.-
While
aximum:While the proposed project does include cuts and fills beyond those established in
the design guidelines, much thought and study has been put into locating this
grading on the back side of the hill, out of the view of all the closest neighbors. The
proposed cuts of up to 6' (where 4' max is allowed without Planning Commission .
approval) are required to make sure the proposed structure is tucked into the
existing contours, therefore keeping the profile of the building to a minimum. These
cuts also allow us to make sure the proposed structure is still highly functional and
usable as a barn and agricultural building, but reduce it's perceived bulk to the
neighbors. Most of the daily farming and viticulture functions in the building will be
located below existing grade, out of the sight of the closest neighbors. By locating
these uses below grade, the neighbors will be shielded from any ambient noise by
earthen embankments, keystone retaining walls, and screen plantings (both existing
and new). These graded areas are also shielded from views from the Open Space
Preserve to the West by a large stand of 50 year old Eucalyptus trees and the existing
apricot orchard, which are to remain.
Conclusion
The proposed design demonstrates that the owners clearly are not interested in fully
developing the property and capitalizing on its potential real estate value, but would
rather protect the rural atmosphere of the neighborhood, continue the rich
agricultural traditions established here by the previous owners, and preserve the
quiet and pastoral rural solitude that the area now enjoys. Given the possibilities for
the subdivision and development of this large property, it is comforting to know that
the Town's Design Guidelines have been written such that this design approach will
be given considerable weight when reviewing this project for approval.
(continued next page)
Hitz Agricultural Accessory Structure
April 2.0,2-005
Page 3 of 3
After working closely with the Town's Planning staff for the past several months on
this project, we feel strongly that the project as proposed meets with the purpose,
spirit, and intent of the Site Development Ordinance, the Accessory Structure Code,
as well as with the Town's Design Guidelines, in that it "preserves and enhances the
natural beauty of the community" and "retains the rural countryside character and
openness of the Town's setting".
We respectfully request that the Planning Commission carefully review the drawings,
documentation, and photographs, visit the site, make positive findings as outlined
above, and grant'approval of the Zoning Development Permit for the proposed
Accessory Structures, as requested.
Thank you. If you h n uestions or need for further clarification please call me
Sincerel
Noel F. C
Architect
cc: ' Ken, Jerre, Nancy, & David Hitz
Paul Conrado, The Conrado Company
Susan Roberts, Giuliani & Kull
IFA7TACHA46NT
NEIGE BOR NOTIFICATION - A ?,?005
I,Q �
This Notification is being brought to you because you own property within 500 oparty on
which an addition is planned. The description of the addition and the property are as follows:
REQUEST: Addition of a 2,530.7 square foot agricultural structure and removal of a
432.59 square foot existing building, on a 10.547 net acre parcel.
LOCATION: Fila family residence, 26026 Scarff Way. Los Altos Hills APN: 175-03-047.
APPLICANT: Noel P. Cross, Architect AIA
I do not have any objection to this request
Date:
CITY'S FILE NUMBER 80-05-ZP-SD-GD
WHIGM1.1 4-
01472MI468MI
Los Altos Hills, CA 94022
RECLcllreD
NEIGHBORNOTMC.ATION AUG022005
14WOFCO8�YTO�
This Notification is being brought to you because you own property within 500 feet of properly
which an addition is planned. The description of the addition and the property are as follows:
REQUEST: Addition of a 2,530.7 square foot agricultural structure and removal of a
432.59 square foot existing building, on a 10.547 net acre parcel.
LOCATION: Hitz family residence, 26026 Scarff Way. Los Altos Hills; APN: 175-03-047.
APPLICANT: Noel P. Cross, Architect ALA
I do not have any objection to this request
-7.
Signature
�46VLc N IVB , LE r=To ►�
Print Name
AddreaYA" PtOlo LA
Los Altos Hills, CA 94022
CITY'S FILE NUMBER 80-05-ZP-S]:)-GD
vlvrta64091.1
01dR27S14662661
AFCF'7V�O
G O
NEIGEBORNOTMCATION ol*o"4Z 200$
F�
��TOS
This Notification is being brought to you because you own property within 500 feet of property on
which an addition is planned The description of the addition and the property are as follows:
REQUEST: Addition of a 2,530.7 square foot agricultural structure and removal of a
432.59 square foot existing building, on a 10.547 net acre parcel.
LOCATION: Hitz family residence, 26026 Scarff Way. Los Altos Hills; APN: 175-03-047.
APPLICANT: Noel P. Cross, Architect AIA
I do not have my objection to this request
Date:
Aff
-41j
,e-
CITY'S FILE NUMBER 80-05-ZP-SD-GD
WVH661691.1 4-
01d72ns146=1
Los Altos Hills, CA 94022