03/28/1968 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

[[ DISTRICT MO. 2, DIVISION 4 HEARING cont'd.: 4/ City 'Engine:_r stated that no individual assessment in the district exceed; the corresponding true valuation and that the total assessment does not exceed tae total true valuation of the land. within the district. At 6:50 P. M., Mayor Henley ingcired if there were any additional written protests to be filed or withdrawn. No protests were filed or withdrawn. )r',( Council discussion ensued with Floor participation by: Mrs. James Bell, 272f1 Sherlock Road, Louis P. Corbetta, 12500 Corbetta Lane, Thomas Gamboa, 25511 Altamont Road, Thomas Marshall, 25560 Altamont Road. City Attorney introduced and read in its entirety Resolution No. 442, a resolu- tion Overruling Protests and Making Findings Pursuant to Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code -- Sewer Assessment District No. 2. MOTION, SECONDED AND CARRIED: Councilman Fowle moved, Seconded by Davey, that Resolution No. 442 be adopted as read, was carried by a majority roll call vote: Ayes: Councilmen Davey, Fowle, Mayor Henley. Noes: Councilmen Aiken, Benson, Absent: None. At 7:12 P. N., mayor Henley closed the Division 4 Hearing. SCHaDOLL'D ITEM NO. 1 (b). PR0T45T WAARING - SWER ASSESSiINT DISTRICT NO. 2: At 7:15 P, iN., Mayor Henley opened the Protest Hearing on Sewer Assessment 187 District No. 2, City Manager noted that the written protests received were identical to those presented previously at the Division 4 Hearing, City Engineer statedthat the amount of Division 4 Protest should have been 20,06%, instead of 19"% protest. He further stated that the written protests for the iQ2gular Protest Hearing constituted 19.3% of the land within the assessment district, ACTION, SECONDED AND CARRIED: Councilman Fowle moved, Seconded by Davey. that R_solution No. 442 be readopted zfter having heard a revised figure from Engineer setting the written protest at 20.06%, was carried by a majorit, moll Call Vote: Ayes: Councilmen Pow Le, Davey, Mayor Henley. floes: Councilmen Aiken, Benson. Absent: Nona. City Attorney discussed the Eshner Agreement as it relates to District No. 2. eaV noting tiat the deed restriction creates a covenant running with the land which restricts the Eshner's 3!05 acres to 16 building sites. City Attorney testified to qualifications of the Engineer, noting that the firm of Charles S. McCandless & Co. is experienced in public works, is well-knoun nationally and internationally in important public works and that thi., pr -j._-. has been handled principally by Gene D2Armond and Marvin Nachtsheim; oe.^h of woom is a registered Civil Engineer in numerous States and has had consi9c_.aZi c axperiencc in Civil Engineering and the matters of assessment proceedings. 401 City Engineer presented evidence regarding the benefit and spread of the WC assessment, noting that the existing single building lots which can not be sub^:ivided but which are within it:e service area of the trunks being installed will be assessed one full sharp_ of the total assessment. Parcels containing more 14in one building site shall be assessed for the number of potential -2-