My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/03/1965
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
City Council Minutes
>
1965
>
05/03/1965
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 11:43:54 AM
Creation date
8/13/2015 3:13:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
Date
1965-05-03
Description
Regular Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilman Clayton expressed his desire for a complete, open <br />and unbiased investigation which will reveal all the facts the <br />^} Town's people want to see and hear. <br />Further discussion from the Floor was heard by Messrs. Bedell, <br />Mead, Wheeler, and Mesdames Toth and Weisbart. <br />An amendment to the original Motion by Councilman Clayton was <br />accepted by Mayor pro tem Aiken as follows: <br />AMENDMENT TO MOTION: <br />That the investigation be broadened to include <br />many items which have occurred within the past <br />year and that said committee shall have the <br />authority to go into secret meetings which have <br />transpired, thereby not limiting this investi- <br />gation to .the particular issue at hand. <br />AMENDED BY: Aiken; ACCEPTED: Clayton <br />In response to an inquiry from the Floor, the following <br />additional amendment was proposed: <br />:MENDMENT TO MOTION: <br />That all hearings of the Committee must be <br />(_ ) public, with no facts withheld, and such <br />-- hearings to be held at the Town Hall. <br />:MENDED BY: Aiken; ACCEPTED: Clayton <br />Comments were then heard from the Councilmen. Councilmen Fowle <br />and Henley were not in favor of the Motion, contending the only <br />issue before the Council was one of confidence in the Mayor and <br />not one of misconduct. Councilman Henley stated if it were the <br />wish of the Town's people to have a Committee (to which he had <br />no objection), their results would be the basis for action by <br />the electorate, but that it would not disturb the action already <br />taken by the Council. <br />Councilman Clayton supported the Motion in order that the <br />Committee might have the opportunity to delve in greater depth, <br />since he felt there were many facts not previously considered. <br />Mayor pro tem Aiken declared the charges which have been made <br />must be faced and the air cleared since the interest of the Town <br />must be paramount, contending his Motion will fairly and completely', <br />settle the matter. <br />It was clarified that the "secret meetings" referred to in one of <br />` the Amendments did not mean personnel or litigation sessions. <br />(� Councilman Bowler abstained from the discussion and voting. <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.