My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/17/1964
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
City Council Minutes
>
1964
>
02/17/1964
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 11:41:02 AM
Creation date
8/14/2015 9:18:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
Date
1964-02-17
Description
Regular Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Inasmuch as the large audience was primarily concerned with <br />Ordinance No. 98, the last item on the Agenda, this matter was <br />acted upon as the next item. <br />-) ORDINANCES: <br />1. Ordinance No. 98 - Paths. Second Reading. <br />Ordinance No. 98, an Ordinance of the Town of Los Altos Hills, <br />amending Ordinance No. 86, relating to General Purpose Paths, <br />was read in its entirety by the City Attorney. <br />The Mayor asked for comments from the Floor. <br />The following residents commented in opposition to the wording <br />of the proposed Ordinance: <br />Mrs. Wm. C. Sedlacek 13341 Wildcrest Drive <br />Mrs. Walter C. Barber 13290 Lennox Way <br />Mr. & Mrs. E. A. Breyman 13456 Wildcrest Drive <br />It was the opinion of Mrs. Sedlacek and Mrs. Breyman that such <br />a change in the Ordinance should wait upon the final report of <br />the Citizens Committee of the Piaster Path Plan. <br />Mrs. Barber, Chairman of Safety and Pathways, Gardner Bullis <br />School PTA, questioned whether the proposed Ordinance would <br />-.1 cancel the validity of an easement granted for pedestrian use <br />only. <br />It was explained by the Council that this rewording is solely <br />for clarification and applies only to subdivisions so that <br />the Council may have broader latitude to call for any path <br />which may be appropriate. This clarification does not deal with <br />the use of the path; only the obligation of the subdivider. <br />The following residents were in favor of the proposed Ordinnn,n <br />as read: <br />Miss Harding (representing 13631 Burke Road <br />the 4-H Riding Club) <br />Mr. C. W. Cathcart 26481 Purissima Road <br />Mr. J. C. Arthur 13751 La Paloma Road <br />ACTION: <br />That the words "general purpose" be omitted <br />from. the proposed Ordinance No. 98. <br />MOTION: Fc,,le; SECOND: Bowler <br />ROLL C.'_Lh: AYES: Bowler, Fowle, Henley, Mayor Clayton <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Aiken <br />( The City Attorney read, in its entirety, Ordinance No. 98, as <br />amended. Second reading will be March 2, 1964. <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.