Laserfiche WebLink
UNSCHEDULED ITEMS: <br />�1 3. Report ofCommittee Studying Sewers - Mr.. Charles Walter. <br />The City Manager, in the absence of Mr.Walter, reported for the Committee, stating <br />the Committee has set up a revised schedule of meetings to be held March 280, <br />April 4'UT, April 18'= and April 25'^. The report is expected to be in the hands of <br />the Council early in May, 1967. <br />Mayor Henley expressed thanks to the Committee for the work accomplished. <br />SCHEDULED ITEMS: <br />1. Sewer Assessment. District No. 2. <br />Mr. Nachtsheim,City Engineer, reported his office is in process of preparing <br />plans to be submitted prior to adoption of a resolution of intent, and hopes to <br />report at the next meeting. <br />The Mayor explained the delay has to do with problems the Rosehill Estates <br />developer is having due to rainy weather. <br />Mrs. P. Weisbart asked whether the people would know the actual boundaries of the <br />proposed assessment district before the next meeting. <br />Mr. Faisant, City Attorney, answered that the people within the proposed assessment <br />district will have a month's notice to study the plan; they will receive written <br />notice and the properties will be posted. <br />Mrs. Weisbart asked if the plans and information will be available prior to the <br />Council's receiving the Sewer Committee's Report, to which the Mayor stated he <br />doubted that the Sewer Report will have been received. <br />Mayor Henley stated that he had given thought to a certain matter, and thought the <br />air needed to be cleared along certain points concerning sewers. <br />(COPY OF THE MAYOR'S COMMENTS IS ATTACHED TO RECORD COPY OF MINUTES.) <br />TheMayor then asked the City Engineer for an estimate of the costs per landowner <br />in the proposed Sewer Assessment District No. 2. Mr. Nachtsheim answered that <br />his estimate was FIFTEEN HUNDRED DOLLARS (01500.00) per landowner, or less. <br />The Mayor stated this was deemed to be a figure payable in cash; that interest <br />would have to be added if payment was to be deferred over the life of Assessment <br />Bond (15 years)p <br />Councilman Davey asked Mr. Nachtsheim to estimate how near the actual cost would <br />be to the assessment estimate, judging from his past experience --what would be the <br />margin of error. After commenting on bids made on other jobs, citing the high and <br />low bids and the actual costs, Mr. Nachtsheim stated he felt his estimate would <br />be within four percent (4;n). <br />�) Comments from the Floor were made by the following: Mrs. R. W. Towle, Messebs, <br />G. Ferrari, D. Spencer, and D. Janssen. <br />-2- <br />