08/15/1966 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Dusenberry - cont'd. ACTION: {� That the request of Arthur W. Dusenberry (326-66) for an adjustment of the property line (Duzenberry-Bewley), by metes and bounds description, be approved, subject to the condition that Parcel I be designated as 'Not a Building Site'. MOTION: Fowle; SECOND: Davey; Note: No map will be filed at this time; survey and recorda- tion of map will be required prior to issuance of any building permits for this property. The Question was called. VOTE: Passed unanimously SCIEDULED ITEMS: 2. Rose Hill Estates (322-66)_26 lots. Final Map Tract No. 4215. ngrs. J. ammond Associates. The City Clerk read theprovious action of the Council, approving the Tentative Map, and explained that the bond and the Subdivi- sion Agreement have not been filed due to involvement in a pro- posed assessment district for sanitary sewers. He explained that his signature will be withheld from the final map until all re- quirements have been complied with. Councilman Fowls explained problems relative to the proposed sewer assessment district. ACTION: That the Final Map of Rose.Uill Estates Tract No. 4215 be approved, subject to the Planning Commission's recommenda- tion, approval of cognizant agencies, and the withholding of signature on the map until all requirements of appli- cal ordinances have been complied with. MOTION: Bowler; SECOND: Fowls; VOTE: Passed unanimously 3. Private Roads in New Subdivisions. Committee Report of Councilmen S. M. Fowls and G. E. Bowler, of May 16, 1966 as revised August S, 1966, was discussed by Council- man Fowls along with the letter to him (May 26, 1966) from Com. M. L. Hawley of the Planning Commission. Discussion was mainly relative to private roads in new subdivi- sions, the present allowance of five lots being served from a private road; the inclusion/exclusion of private road area from net acreage of a subdivision; the possibility of a provision -3-