1476 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - gust 18, 1982 E. SPECIAL ORDERS: Item 2 - Reconsideration of Resolution #1471 (continued) : lbw PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To direct the City Manager to recommend an appropriate pro-rata charge for the JPA at the next meeting. 3. Request for Parcel Map Approval, LANDS OF ASSY, File SA #5-81 MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: MovedAby- Hillestad, seconded by Allison and passed unanimously to adopt Resolution.#14Mpproving parcel map and accepting easements, Lands of Tossy MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Allison, seconded by Proft and passed unanimously to adopt Resolution`#�1�4'76 roving and authorizing execution of an agreement between the City of the Town of Los Altos Hills and Jerome D. and Tamara Ann Tossy 4. Public Hearing: a) Williamson Act Contract - Petition requesting cancellation of Kinkead Williamson Act Contract - (continued from 7/21/82 Council meeting and continued for sixty days at request of applicant) MOTION SECONDED AND CARR►H ): Moved by Allison, seconded by Hillestad and passed unanimously to continue Kinkead petition for cancellation of Williamson Act Contract for sixty days. 5. Consideration of appeal of Site Develoirent Permit - Lands of Cooper , lot 10 - Matadero Creek Subdivision Frank Saul, 27977 Via Ventana, referred to his letter, to the Council dated 8/18/82. In his opinion the approval of this site development permit was not in keeping with the preservation of the rural standards of the Town and would destroy the Town's ability to regulate site development within reasonable bounds on steep lots. Mr. Saul further questioned Council's decision to hear his appeal rather than having it referred back to the Planning Catmission for consideration. The City Planner commented on his staff report dated 8/13/82 noting in part that the appeal appeared to he mainly pointed at the house instead of the grading and drainage. Be further noted that the design of the structure was not part of the site development permit. A slide presentation was given which showed examples of grading throughout the Town. Mr. Cooper, owner of Lot 10 - Matadero Creek Subdivision, diagramed for Council his plans for the house. Mr. Cooper emphasized landscaping, his attempt to preser% the contours of the site, the visibility flan the road, his concern for the neighbors and drainage. Mr. Cooper noted that at the Site Development meeting the neighbors were present and were pleased with the plans l-e presented. Council discussed the Site Development process in general and the appeal concerninc Tot 10 in particular. Proft requested clarification fan the City Planner regardi3 the type of foundation approved for Lot 10. van Tamelen noted that the Architectu) Carrrittee established in the CC&Rs was not in effect nor had two Planning Cammissic lbw been present at the Site Development meeting. -5-