Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.2 TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS October 13, 2005 Staff Report to the Planning Commission RE: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AND SETBACK VARIANCE TO ALLOW AN EQUIPMENT SHED TO ENCROACH WITHIN THE SIDE YARD SETBACK; LANDS OF LOS ALTOS HILLS (WESTWIND BARN); 27210 ALTAMONT ROAD;FILE# 177-05-ZP-SD-CUP-VAR. FROM: Brian Froelich, Assistant Planner APPROVED BY: Carl Cahill, Planning Director(,G RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission: Approve the requested Conditional Use Permit and Variance, subject to the recommended conditions and findings of .approval in Attachments 1, 2, and 3 and forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council. BACKGROUND The site is a Town owned 14.96-acre property located at 27210 Altamont Road. Currently, the site is used by the Westwind Barn commercial stable and has been operating under a Conditional Use Permit at the site since 1977. The subject property is located immediately to the west of the 50.25 acre Byrne Preserve. Existing structures on the property include the barn, paddocks, corrals, and riding arenas. Surrounding uses include single-family residences to the west, south, and north, and the Byrne Preserve to the east. PROJECT SUMMARY Verizon Wireless has submitted plans for a 65 foot wireless communications pole, with 6 antennas and an equipment shelter that is 13 feet tall with a similar architectural style as the existing barn. Verizon Wireless has provided two pole designs that meet their requirements for the target service area: 1. Mono-Pine: The mono pine design would be 65 feet tall with a 17 foot wide canopy. This type of pole is limited in the potential for co-location because only one other wireless carrier could be located on this type of pole. The faux foliage limits reception and mounting capabilities. 2. Slimline Pole: This design would be 65 feet tall and painted a flat, earthtone color. This design reduces overall bulk and allows two potential co-location elevations. Verizon Wireless has provided these two designs for consideration by the Town. Planning Commission Verizon Wireless Y 27210 Altamont Road October 13,2005 Page 2 of 7 A radio frequency analysis for the project was prepared by Verizon Wireless in August of 2005. The report concluded that the proposed Verizon Wireless service would comply with the FCC's current prevailing standard for limiting human exposure to RF energy. Therefore, no significant impact on the environment or general population is expected. See full report attached (Attachment 7). ar a e + cx 1 t �� This is a view of the _ Westwind Barn from the intersection of Altamont Road and Cortez Lane.The ..`.. ■■ ':■■ ■■ .■.■■.■■ ■"■■■ ■■■■: ■ ■■.;■■ approximate 65 foot elevation is noted with the red line. qv,�A DISCUSSION Per sections 10-1.505 and 10-2.301 (c)(7) of the Los Altos Hills Municipal Code, the proposed 65 foot pole is sited in a permitted location on site but requires Planning Commission review because of the pole height. The proposed ground equipment cabinets are housed in a 289 square foot structure with a similar architectural style as the existing barn. The proposed equipment shelter is proposed in the side yard setback and requires Variance approval. ALTERNATIVE SITING Verizon Wireless considered an alternative site for the antenna installation at the Palo Alto Hills Country Club but the design was unable to meet height requirements. The Purissima Hills Water District was also contacted but they do not have any water tank sites in the target service area. Planning Commission Verizon Wireless 27210 Altamont Road October 13,2005 Page 3 of 7 VARIANCE Per Section 10-1.505 of the Municipal Code, structures must be located,a minimum of 30 feet from the side property line. The ground equipment shelter is proposed along the property boundary with the Town owned Byrne Preserve site giving the structure a zero (lot line) setback location. Verizon Wireless representatives visited the site and determined that the proposed locations are the most suitable for the monopole and the equipment shelter because it will avoid impact to existing structures and circulation on the property. Copies of the plans were routed to the Westwind Barn board and no comments have been received as of the writing of this. report. The Variance request impacts two contiguous Town owned properties and no negative impact is anticipated to any privately owned land as a result of a reduced setback. The property line in question is an interior lot line between the Town's properties. Variance findings are included in this staff report for Commission review (Attachment 3). WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY POLICY The proposed facility is consistent with the Town's Wireless Communications Facilities Policy because it is a non-residential site, and visual impacts are minimized by the design of the pole and equipment shelter. Co-location is a possibility with both designs and the applicant has sent a mailing to neighbors within 500 feet (Attachment 8). Pursuant to the Town's Wireless Communications Facilities Policy, Verizon Wireless submitted a 3-5 year Antenna Master Plan showing all existing and anticipated AT&T antenna sites within the Town boundaries for Planning Commission review (Attachment 6). CEOA STATUS In conformance with CEQA requirements, staff has prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment 4). ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT Verizon Wireless has requested a 12 foot wide access and utility easement to be located along the existing driveway to the barn. This easement would be recorded if the project is approved and expire if the Conditional Use Permit is not renewed or the site is no longer in use. Planning Commission Verizon Wireless 27210 Altamont Road October 13,2005 Page 4 of 7 COMMITTEE COMMENTS Project plans were routed to the Environmental Design and Open Space Committees. The Open Space Committee has no substantive comments and comments from the Environmental Design Committee have not been received as of the writing of this report. CONCLUSION The proposed wireless communications facility at the Westwind Barn site will provide wider cellular phone coverage to the northwest portion of the Town. Based on the project analysis and initial study the proposed project, as mitigated, will not have a significant effect on the environment. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Recommended Conditions of Approval 2. -- - Findings for Approval of the Conditional Use Permit 3. Findings for Approval of the Variance 4. Initial Study/Notice of Intent to Adopt Negative Declaration 5. Wireless Communications Policy 6. Verizon Wireless 3-5 Year Antenna Master Plan 7. RF Report August 2005 8. Mailing to Neighbors 9. Development Plans Slimline Pole and Mono-Pine (Commission only) cc: Jason Smith 2001 Omega Road San Ramon, CA 94583 Planning Commission Verizon Wireless 27210 Altamont Road October 13,2005 Page 5 of 7 ATTACHMENT 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY 27210 ALTAMONT ROAD (LANDS OF LOS ALTOS BH-LSAVESTWIND BARN) File#177-05-ZP-SD-CUP-VAR PLANNING: 1. Any changes or revisions to the telecommunications facility or its use shall require an amendment to the applicable conditional use permit(s). Additionally, the Planning Director may, at any time, schedule a review or revocation hearing before the Planning Commission regarding the use permit, if any condition of approval is not being met or the facility is being used inconsistently with the approved use or in violation of Town development codes. 2. The use permit shall expire five (5) years from the date of approval. Renewal of the permit must be requested in writing, with appropriate fees, prior to the expiration date. 3. The Slimlme pole and antennas shall be painted using earth tone colors with a reflectivity value not greater than 40% and a sample of the color must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of Building Permit. This condition is void if the Mono-Pine design is approved. 4. The equipment shelters shall be painted a color consistent with the existing barn. A sample of the color must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of Building Permit. 5. Landscape screening of the equipment enclosure may be required by the Planning Department prior to final inspection, if determined to be necessary. 6. The applicant shall submit a signed agreement to the Town that should the use be discontinued by the carrier, all facilities will be removed and the easement 'abandoned not later than ninety (90) days after discontinuance of the use or abandonment. The agreement shall be approved by the City Attorney, and must be signed by the applicant and submitted to the Town prior to.acceptance of plans for building plan check. 7. Not later than thirty (30) days after installation of the antenna facility, and on or prior to January 1" of each year thereafter, testing of radio frequency emissions shall be conducted by qualified professionals and the reports of such testing shall Planning Commission Verizon Wireless 27210 Altamont Road October 13,2005 Page 6 of 7 be provided in writing to the Planning Department, with a comparison of applicable Federal emission standards. If at any time the emission levels are shown not to comply with Federal standards, the use permit shall be scheduled for a revocation hearing before the Planning Commission. 8. The applicant may be required to correct any and all future interference problems experienced by neighbors with respect to reception problems caused by this facility. 9. Verizon Wireless shall be responsible for repair or repainting of the existing and proposed facilities in case of vandalism or wear and must do so within 72 hours of notice by the Town that a complaint has been received. ENGINEERING: 10. Any, and all, changes to the approved Site Plan shall first be approved by the Town Engineering Department. No grading shall take place during the grading moratorium (November 1 to April 1) except with prior approval from the City Engineer. No grading shall take place within ten feet of any property line. 11. Final grading and drainage shall be inspected by the Engineering Department and any deficiencies corrected to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department prior to final approval. 12. Any, and all, areas on the project site that have the native material disturbed shall be protected for erosion control during the rainy season and shall be replanted prior to final inspection. 13. The applicant shall inform the Town of any damage and shall repair any damage caused by the construction of the project to pathways, private driveways, and public and private roadways,prior to final inspection and shall provide the Town with photographs of the existing conditions of the roadways and pathways prior to acceptance of plans for building plan check. 14. Two copies of a grading and construction operation plan shall be submitted by the property owner for review and approval by the City Engineer and Planning Director prior to acceptance of plans for building plan check. The grading/construction operation plan shall address truck traffic issues regarding dust, noise, and vehicular and pedestrian traffic safety on Altamont Road and surrounding roadways; storage of construction materials; placement of sanitary facilities; parking for construction vehicles; and parking for construction personnel. A debris box (trash dumpster) shall be placed on site for collection of construction debris. Arrangements must be made with the Los Altos Garbage ATTACHMENT 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES 27210 ALTAMONT ROAD (LOS ALTOS HILLS/WESTWIND BARN) FILE# 177-05-ZP-SD-CUP-VAR 1. The proposed use or facility is properly located in relation to the community as a whole, land uses,and transportation and service facilities in the vicinity; The proposed location of the pole and equipment shelter is the best possible location with the surrounding open space and residential uses in the neighborhood. The proposed pole would be located to the rear of the existing barn along a row of existing mature trees. The pole would be placed in a location where a mature tree was previously removed. The equipment shelter would be located along the eastern property boundary, approximately 300 feet from the nearest residence. The shelter would have a similar architectural style as the existing barn. Visual impacts to the existing residences to the west would be reduced by the existing barn and paddocks. Construction of the proposed wireless communication facility will not place an undue burden on existing transportation, utilities and services in the vicinity since the project only requires on-site visits by Verizon personnel for regular maintenance of the facility. 2. The site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate this use and all yards, open spaces, walls and fences, parking, loading, landscaping, and such other features as may be required by this chapter or will be needed to assure that the proposed use will be reasonably compatible with land uses normally permitted in the surrounding area; The site has been developed as a commercial barn and open space use accommodating hiking and equestrian purposes. The proposed installations would not have any impact to the existing uses onsite. The existing parking facilities would be sufficient for the limited trips generated by construction and maintenance of the equipment. The proposed installations total less than 300 square feet. 3. The site is served by streets and highways of adequate width and pavement to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated by this proposed use; and The construction and maintenance of the proposed pole and equipment will generate minimal additional traffic. The site is served by Altamont Road, which can accommodate traffic generated by the proposed use. 1 4. The site does not adversely affect the abutting property or the permitted use thereof. The conditions of approval of this permit include standards in accordance with the Wireless Communication Policy to ensure land use compatibility. In addition, Conditions of Approval will mitigate the visual impacts and future problems with the site. The proposed wireless communication facility, as conditioned, will not adversely affect other properties in the vicinity or the general welfare of the Town. 2 ATTACHMENT 3 VARIANCE FINDINGS WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES 27210 ALTAMONT ROAD (LOS ALTOS HILLS/WESTWIND BARN) FILE# 177-05-ZP-SD-CUP-VAR 1. Because of exceptional and extraordinary circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the provisions of this Title is found to deprive such property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification; The large (14.96 ac.), Town owned (Westwind Barn) property is surrounded by Town owned(Byrne Preserve)open space to the south and east. The siting of the existing barn and site circulation limits the siting options for the equipment shelter and locating the shelter elsewhere on the site would interfere with the current operations. The property line in question is an interior boundary line that separates two Town owned properties that are used similarly and simultaneously by Town residents and neither property could be sold without a vote of the people. The strict application of the provisions of this Title creates a hardship by creations of a setback in the middle of jointly used properties. 2. Upon the granting of the variance, the intent and purpose of the applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance will still be served and the recipient of the variance will not be granted special privileges not enjoyed by other surrounding property owners. The purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance is still served. The proposed location of the equipment shelter complies with setbacks from rights-of-way and existing residential properties in the area. This would not be a grant of special privilege because the Town has granted a setback Variance for wireless equipment with a previous application (AT&T Wireless 26451 Ascension Drive). 3. The granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental.to the public welfare or injurious to the property, improvements or uses within the immediate vicinity and within the same zoning district. The granting of the Variance for encroachment into the setback would not impact any immediate,neighbors or property owners because the area of encroachment within the setback is located in the center of the property relative to required setbacks from rights-of- way or adjacent residential properties. The proposed pole and equipment meet the FCC limits for human exposure and the installations will be completed to Building Code standards.No detriment to public welfare is anticipated. 1 4. The variance will not authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the Zoning District regulations governing the parcel of property. The proposed pole and equipment shelter are uses that are consistent with the Town's Wireless Communications Policy. The subject property is owned by the Town and all residents would enjoy greater wireless service in this area. 2 e ATTACHMENT NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO: Interested Individuals From: Town of Los Altos Hills County Clerk of Santa Clara Planning Department 26379 Fremont Road Los Altos Hills, CA 94022 Subject: Notice of Intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Project Title: Verizon Wireless Communications Facility at 27210 Altamont Road. Project Planner: Brian Froelich, Assistant Planner Project Description: Conditional Use Permit and Variance to allow the installation of a wireless communications facility consisting of six (6) antennas mounted on a 65' tall monopole and associated ground equipment enclosure in the required side setback. Project Location: 26379 Fremont Road, Los Altos Hills, CA 94022 In accordance with Section 15072(a),notice is hereby given of the Town's intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project listed above. The Town of Los Altos Hills has completed a review of the proposed project, and on the basis of an Initial Study, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. The Town has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study that are available for public review at Town Hall,26379 Fremont Road, Los Altos Hills California,94022. As mandated by State Law, the minimum comment period for this document is 20 (twenty) days and begins on October 5, 2005 and ends on October 25, 2005 at 5:00 p.m. Persons having comments concerning this project, including objections to the basis of determination set forth in the Initial Study/Negative Declaration, are invited to furnish their comments summarizing the specific and factual basis for their comments, in writing to: Town of Los Altos Hills Planning Department. Testimony at future public hearings may be limited to those issues submitted in writing by 5:00 PM the day the comment period closes. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21177, any legal challenge to the adoption of the proposed Initial Study/Negative Declaration will be limited to those issues presented to the Town during the public comment period described above. PUBLIC HEARING: The Planning Commission will review the proposed Negative Declaration and Initial Study for this project at its regular meeting on October 13, 2005 at 7:00 pm. The City Council will review and adopt the proposed Negative Declaration and Initial Study for this project at its regular meeting on November 3, 2005 at 6:00 pm in the in the Council Chambers of Town Hall,25892 Fremont Road,Los Altos Hills,California. The project area is not on any of the lists enumerated under Section 65962.5 of the Government Code including,but not limited to lists of hazardous waste facilities,land designated as hazardous waste property, and hazardous waste disposal sites, and the information included in the Hazardous Waste and Substances Statement required under subsection(f) of that section. Carl Cahill,Planning Director Phone: (650)941-7222 xt. 224 Email: ccahill@losaltoshills.ca.gov Fax: (650) 941-3160 Town of Los Altos Hills 26379 Fremont Road Los Altos Hills, CA 94022 INITIAL STUDY In accordance with the policies regarding implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, this document, combined with the attached supporting data, constitutes the initial study on the subject project. This initial study provides the basis for the determination of whether the project may have a significant effect on the environment. If it is determined that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, an environmental impact report will be prepared which focuses on the areas of concern identified by this initial study. If it is determined that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment, it is eligible for a Negative Declaration. If it is determined that the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, however, the significant effects of the project have been reduced to a less-than-significant level because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project applicant, then the project would be eligible for a Mitigated Negative Declaration. 1. Project Title: Verizon Wireless Communication Facility 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: Town of Los Altos Hills 26379 Fremont Road Los Altos Hills, California 94022 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Carl Cahill, Planning Director(650)941-7222 Initial Study prepared by: Brian Froelich,Assistant Planner 4. Project Location: 27210 Altamont Road, Los Altos Hills, CA 94022 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Town of Los Altos Hills/Verizon Wireless 27210 Altamont Road Los Altos Hills, CA 94022 6. General Plan Designation: Recreation Area-Private 7. Zoning: R-A (residential-agricultural) 8. Description of Project: Conditional Use Permit and Variance request for a wireless communication facility consisting of six antennae on a monopole and ground equipment to locate on the Westwind Barn site. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The subject property is located on the south side of Altamont Drive. Surrounding uses include single-family residences on adjacent properties to the west and north, Byrne Preserve is located to the east and south adjacent to the Westwind Barn. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required: None 1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology/Soils Hazards&Hazardous Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Materials Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities/Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance This Initial study has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Information and conclusions in the Initial Study are based upon staff research and the Town's General Plan and Municipal Code. DETERAHNATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a Q significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project.A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s)on the environment,but at least one effect I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets,if the effect is a "potentially significant impact"or"potentially significant unless mitigated."An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there WILL,NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR,including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signature: Date: September 25,2005 Carl Cahill,Plammng Director 2 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation I.AESTHETICS—Would the project: a)Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic LJ U L vista? b)Substantially damage scenic resources, L] LJ L including,but not limited to,trees,rock outcroppings,and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c)Substantially degrade the existing visual L L3 character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d)Create a new source of substantial light or L3 LJ L glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? IMPACT: The project consists of a 65 foot monopole and 289 square foot equipment enclosure.The project is consistent with the Town's Wireless Communications Policy because the property is owned by the Town. The proposal to install a monopole and equipment cabinets, as mitigated, should not substantially degrade the visual character and quality of the site and its surroundings. Currently, the site is developed with a bam, paddocks, and corrals,which are visible from off-site. MITIGATION: To ensure that the visual impact of the proposed installations will be mitigated the applicant has proposed two options for the pole design as follows: 1. A proposed monopine(faux tree)that would reduce the visual impact of the pole when viewed from offsite and is similar in height to existing mature trees around the barn. 2. A slimline pole painted a flat earthtone color that reduces the bulk and massing of the pole and preserves views from offsite. H.AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model(1997)prepared by the California Dept.of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.Would the project: I a)Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or L3 Ll Farmland of Statewide Importance(Farmland), j as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non- agricultural use? i 3 I Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation b)Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or a Williamson Act contract? c)Involve other changes in the existing 1 environment which,due to their location or nature,could result in conversion of Farmland,to non-agricultural use? III.AIR QUALITY--Where available,the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.Would the project: a)Conflict with or obstruct implementation of 171 Q the applicable air quality plan? b)Violate any air quality standard or contribute 1 �( substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c)Result in a cumulatively considerable net 171 Z increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d)Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e)Create objectionable odors affecting a 171 0 substantial number of people? IJ IV.BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES--Would the project: a)Have a substantial adverse effect,either 1-7f directly or through habitat modifications,on any LJ species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or regional plans, policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? b)Have a substantial adverse effect on any 171 1-7f riparian habitat or other sensitive natural L�I community identified in local or regional plans, policies,regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c)Have a substantial adverse effect on federally 4 I Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(including,but not limited to,marsh,vernal pool,coastal,etc.)through direct removal,filling,hydrological interruption, or other means? d)Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e)Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f)Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation Plan,or other approved local, regional,or state habitat conservation plan? V.CULTURAL RESOURCES--Would the project: a)Cause a substantial adverse change in the 171 R1 significance of a historical resource as defined in '15064.5? b)Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to'15064.5? c)Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d)Disturb any human remains,including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI.GEOLOGY AND SOILS--Would the project: a)Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving: i)Rupture of a known earthquake fault,as 1 delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 5 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation ii)Strong seismic ground shaking? 1 iii)Seismic-related ground failure,including liquefaction? iv)Landslides? b)Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of 171 0 Z topsoil? c)Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is 171 1 unstable,or that would become unstable as a result of the project,and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide,lateral spreading, subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? d)Be located on expansive soil,as defined in 171 0 Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994),creating substantial risks to life or property? e)Have soils incapable of adequately supporting [71 0 the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? VII.HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS B Would the project: a)Create a significant hazard to the public or the 1-7f environment through the routine transport,use,or L�I disposal of hazardous materials? b)Create a significant hazard to the public or the 173 171Z environment through reasonably foreseeable LJ upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c)Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,substances,or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d)Be located on a site which is included on a list 171 0 of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e)For a project located within an airport land use 171 Z plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use 6 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f)For a project within the vicinity of a private 171 17 airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g)Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h)Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,injury or death involving wildland fires,including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? VIII.HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY --Would the project: a)Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b)Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g.,the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c)Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e)Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 7 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact A itigation Impact Incorporation f)Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g)Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h)Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i)Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j)Inundation by seiche,tsunami,or mudflow? IX.LAND USE AND PLANNING-Would the project: a)Physically divide an established community? b)Conflict with any applicable land use plan, Q policy,or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project(including,but not limited to the general plan,specific plan,local coastal program,or zoning ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c)Conflict with any applicable habitat 1-7f conservation plan or natural community LTJ conservation plan? X.MINERAL RESOURCES--Would the project: a)Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b)Result in the loss of availability of a locally- �( important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,specific plan or other land use plan? M.NOISE B Would the project result in: a)Exposure of persons to or generation of noise �1 levels in excess of standards established in the I� 0 • local general plan or noise ordinance,or 8 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation applicable standards of other agencies? b)Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? c)A substantial permanent increase in ambient 171 17 171 noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d)A substantial temporary or periodic increase in 171 Q ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e)For a project located within an airport land use 171 0 FA plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f)For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XII.POPULATION AND HOUSING--Would the project: a)Induce substantial population growth in an 171 0 z area,either directly(for example,by proposing new homes and businesses)or indirectly(for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b)Displace substantial numbers of existing 0 Q housing,necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c)Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII.PUBLIC SERVICES a)Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 9 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact AEtigation Impact Incorporation Fire protection? Police protection? r'7 Schools? rlf Parks? IJ Other public facilities? 171 L�r9 Z XIV.RECREATION-- a)Would the project increase the use of existing L�171 R1 neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b)Does the project include recreational facilities 171 L-r' 0 7 or require the construction or expansion of r LJ recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV.TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC--Would the project: a)Cause an increase in traffic which is 171 r'1 1-7f substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system(i.e.,result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips,the volume to capacity ratio on roads,or congestion at intersections)? b)Exceed,either individually or cumulatively,a [71 level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c)Result in a change in air traffic patterns, 171 0rel Z including either an increase in traffic levels or a LJ� change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d)Substantially increase hazards due to a design 1 171 Z feature(e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous IJ intersections)or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? e)Result in inadequate emergency access? 171 73 Z 10 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation f)Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 g)Conflict with adopted policies,plans,or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g.,bus turnouts,bicycle racks)? XVI.UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS B Would the project: a)Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b)Require or result in the construction of new 1 water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c)Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d)Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources,or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e)Result in a determination by the wastewater 171 R1 treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project=s projected demand in addition to the provider=s existing commitments? f)Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project=s L� u solid waste disposal needs? g)Comply with federal,state,and local statutes 1 and regulations related to solid waste? XVII.MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE-- a)Does the project have the potential to degrade of the quality of the environment,substantially LJ reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the 11 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation major periods of California history or prehistory? b)Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects,and the effects of probable future projects)? c)Does the project have environmental effects 173 0 0 z which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either directly or indirectly? Sources:Los Altos Hills General Plan Los Altos Hills Municipal Code i 12 ATTACHMENT S TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Policy Re: Wireless Communications Facilities Code Sections and Design Guidelines: Section 10-1.703(h)(2) of the Zoning Ordinance allows service uses, including "communications facilities", to be permitted in the Town if a Conditional Use Permit is granted by the Planning Commission and City Council. Section 10-1.1107(1) of the Code outlines findings which must be made to approve a use permit,including the proper location of the use or facility relative to others in the vicinity, the adequacy of the site to accommodate the use, and that the facility or use will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. The Design Guidelines do not address such uses, but do suggest(on pages 29-31) that ancillary facilities, such as lights, pool equipment, and satellite dishes, be located so as to minimize impacts on neighbors. Intent: The purpose of this policy is to outline the desired criteria for siting of wireless communications facilities, generally including monopoles, related antennas, and equipment shelters. As the Town's land use is virtually entirely residential, wireless communication facilities will be most appropriately located on public or institutional sites existing within the Town. Collocation, location on or near existing buildings, and landscape screening will be desired to minimize the visual impacts of the facilities on neighbors and the public. Policies: 1. Priorities for Siting. Wireless communication facilities shall generally be located on properties not used for residential purposes, with priority as follows: a) Town-owned properties; b) Foothill College; c) water tank sites; and d) other public or quasi-public facilities, such as schools or churches. 2. Siting on Residential Parcels. Wireless communication facilities shall not be permitted on properties used for residential purposes or vacant parcels intended for residential use,.unless the residential property owner provides written consent and: a) the carrier demonstrates that all alternative non- residential sites (including collocation) have been explored and are not technologically feasible for use; and b) no significant visual impacts would result from the proposed facility location. The Town may, at its discretion and at the applicant's cost, retain an independent telecommunications expert to review the carrier's documentation and advise the Town regarding the technological feasibility of alternate sites. Policy Re: Wireless Communications Facilities - page 2 3. Collocation. Collocation of wireless communication facilities with other facilities is encouraged to the maximum extent feasible, as long as the collocation is technologically compatible and does not substantially increase visual impacts. The Town will generally require as a condition of approval for any conditional use permit that the applicant permit collocation of other facilities, subject to technological constraints and Town review. 4. Landscape Screening and Color. Landscape screening shall be required by the Town to minimize the visual impacts of wireless communication facilities. Poles,antennas, and equipment buildings should be painted to blend with the surrounding environment and/or buildings to further minimize visual impacts. 5. Environmental Review. A Negative Declaration will typically be prepared for review of proposed wireless communication facilities, with special attention to the visual impacts of the facilities. Categorical exemptions may _ be used where facilities are collocated with or would be minimal additions to existing structures,with negligible additional visual impact. 6. Antenna Master Plans. Any applicant for a wireless communication facility site shall submit applications, to the best of their knowledge, for all sites anticipated to be required by the carrier for a three (3) to five (5) year period, and the requests shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council as a master plan application. 7. Term of Permits and Abandonment of Sites. Conditional use permits for wireless communication facilities -shall be established for periods not to exceed five (5)'years, at which time renewal of the permit must be requested by the applicant. More frequent review of the operation of the permit may be made a condition of approval. Approval will also require a written agreement from the applicant that, should the use be discontinued by the carrier, all facilities will be removed not later than ninety (90) days after discontinuance of the use or abandonment. Such a provision shall also be included in any lease with the Town for use of Town lands for wireless communications facilities. The Town may require bonding or other surety to assure the removal of such facilities. 8. Wireless communication firms shall, at the time of application for permits, demonstrate efforts which have been made to inform neighboring residents of the proposed facilities,, such as conducting meetings, or mailing fact sheets and/or letters, etc.to neighbors. Approved by City Council: August 21, 1996 av is F 'F :rzk ` Vol WOW r, All YAA IF �;, � - `fir � • � ". �, � low . � � � '� :-�. • — � _�,®c� ,��i,� ,--,- ��,-mss ATTACHMENT "J fuienZWwneless FAA/FCC DATASHEET MAIN FORM Site Name NcLe=iVfiligflands r Y Project/Site ID# Y15H 1� Market Namearaose ? � New Construction d Region Contact: Phone No: Request Date Alteration ❑ Russ Bett3son 92 =26523 r8/3012005k.. Co=Location ❑ - Relocation ❑ NAD 27 Coordinates LATITUDE Abandon ❑ ________ LO_NG_!T_UD_E_ M" X22 ° tK " Temporary* ❑ ;A[ 3 Coordinates LATITUDE 37 ° 21 ' 53 .23 " *(Give Dates of Service) LONGITUDE 122 ° 09 ' 34 .88 " Address or approximate location 7�10'� ltarxioiat�.RRC .��a�'•+'Aif�� ak �`�6:tin City County Zip Last lfossl flI80 S'anta,Glarai .s; C, 9,4""022 $_ Ground Elevation Current(Existing)Height of y392 ftAMSL Support Structure Otis � - (ft)AGL Describe Action/Alteration Requested Current Height of (Le.,Side-mount Colo,Top-mount colo,addition to Appurtenances(e.g.,10 It Lightning Rod) existing Monopole,Self-support,Guyed,Roof/Bldg., Current Overall Tunnel,Water Tank,Utility Pole,COW,TOW) Height(e.g.,Overall Structure plus Appurtenances) 472ii ft A G L Proposed(New)Support New Tree Pole Structure Height fi5 ftAGL Proposed Height of Appurtenances(e.g.,10 It Lightning Rod) Proposed Overall Structure Height(e.g.,structure plus appurtenances) 65y (ft)AGL Il available,attach sketch. Structure Owner/Contact If structure owner is not Verizon Wireless, ATTACH COPY OF OWNER's FAA STUDY AND 854R. Owner Name: 0-77-1 Address City State Zip Phone A 2-C SURVEY MUST BE ATTACHED FOR NEW TOWER CONSTRUCTION (A 1-A SURVEY MUST BE ATTACHED IF MICROWAVE WILL BE ADDED) Marking/Lighting: Red Lights/ Dual/Medium No Other LJ ❑Desired ❑FxMng Paint ❑ Intensity ❑ Preference -❑ BAND/FREQUENCY 880 Mhz CELLULAR WATTS: 30 ERP MICROWAVE WATTS: EIRP(dbm) PAGING WATTS: ERP 1985 Mhz PCS WATTS: 240 EIRP NEPA/NPA APPLICABLE? Yes E No LJ Tower constructed: on or before 3-16-01 ❑ Please attach NEPA Checklist and/or Supporting Documentation after 3-16-01 Other Notes/Comments: FAA studies/approvals can take approximately 6 to 8 weeks(8 to 12 weeks for California);therefore,please submit FAA requests as soon as possible. If Further Study is required by the FAA due to the height of a structure and/or distance to an airport runway, an additional 30 to 45 days will be necessary to complete the study. Revision Date:12/15/04 Macro Version:Enhanced v2 Users must verify that GeoPlan Coordinates and Ground Elevation match Regulatory data for existing sites!! FAA/FCC DATASHEET werrzc mreless SCHEDULE A - CELLULAR/PCS Site Name Page Mill Highlands Project/Site ID# 157417 Market Name San Jose New 0 COORDINATES Modified ❑ NAD 27 LATITUDE 37 ° 21 53 .44 " Delete ❑ LONGITUDE 122 ° 09 ' 31 oil' ---------------- ---- — --- ---- ---- NAD 83 LATITUDE 37 21 53 .23" LONGITUDE 122 ° 09 ' 34 .8B " Analog Extensions,if any? if yes,please list markets extended into. Digital(CDMA) 0 Both ❑ Yes ❑ PCS No 2 Extension Agreements must be attached Sector Antenna Make/Type Max ERP Maximum Orientation CL Ht. Tip Ht. Beamwidth Antenna (Wafts) Downtilt De De AGL(ft) AGL(ft.) De Gain dBd V1 Pi$Qp63 4 0, A -s" n 330 63 OF s i 65 0, 310 _ 1off.P.E1, fflBXA 85()63/BG. 54 a' t '�4().t]i ? OzOM E M 330 ` >._. 8 0 6fl 0 05 tip i^au .a-^4. '4 z-(,`c's 5';: " r :.: .moi,.,,.,'.7r�L�4 .';u� c� k:.t 1' Fa-r,3?'Y ...� ::'r r �^...:�.r _. ,,, �1`fi.c. '+,- YZ'�-v'a 'Svs€`? •..N �:ztt V2 ��•_ �.,.:,...��.��.�saBeta.s�;-�'�s,?��,8 '` $fl063/4.0,..'��°`" M" ��s.._SkO F ��. �h�,z�;:..3 Ox-r3� 5 ...,(�iJ �;� 4�'-., s' tY;;` '. ? Batas z tt B?CA185063/SCFt' _r:xi- 24Q0 €�"� 0:0 4 �a 4 O e r 3 ..v`%s 'i +pF'S , �' 4'` ...:ar. s` b!'-a,�I+r.ACr15� 'n ° 'Fr""yli"a''"xf•rte, > c rs .:-a`C 'fit?"`'fc�'a� "If ` .Fx t '.,rx-• '' = j ,7�T�ry cY' '3 c, f+<fA:L...isett+S f" �Y,� .�#—+�. 6..lfl.U!C�h.}�-'����•rT�4��T. V3 2`.1,"}z2�, .�:-*.,.?+4��` a{n g&t:-`-.�.J'.+7`�wJ � a.. � t9' ,Y.A.�tH_�iy' .sk,u:."t•3 k�'.•.Y�....fl�fl' 4�w�.95:50 ,rf�.' '4sa'F,e`V 5.0.1Oars jLf630 ~x. 1$3 ...z t r., Y�#�^.. . zx .f.,.t�`'oari>1=� _ . . �_ . _ ��{.�t_'4 . H .R2511 V4 msµ,�'('rz,�..,,c , .=7La,.+'e t tts. °rer' .,.a' X _::Y..t.*ai �s..�`L'iAN-Tr. t�� � r.c a-',�''--* '', '7.:•,r.-.ar't,.c-tt'�,-.::v'"d�,:...F ,."i'>s rr #'.`- ti �a �',"i-t i��'X5_ 4?..;': -�. �'°>.....,�a`�' `s:`;"�' .w�..n-•.s.�rd.. �.?'�.. .a'`'.?`+.�.si:`�`s..' i s E'M r Yom' 43- r _ sn,.b;.?-: -k--�t w -,..h.:• ,max .w.i..•"s,•.,..�;n4i?7 Ea-.,. 'x..t at :.t„7i.,`Lfi'.'.?'. �a L��Sa: w''aa'' V5 .sg¢'t a`�.t....f.,,:�`i'��'+.a^*t �.��u� :�a{.�'a,•a,,._i�'^u.`�.�"'�i,rr-?�.�;,�,�,•�'a-'�.�.t-^� .��e t,t-:�3,..m<�._..,� 'fr�r......,:-s f-'�"'?h,� iJ x x;�-�'� _�'i.. =.;.�"•-.sr ..�'""a�-z't..^ -�i�s��o3.�^a"� -'<��.'.�s..J '�- 't s^ x',� �.'.� x-....�,y -•w "'C. i =mom-^+u^,rh" f �`4- . z. r njY-.u. y�r ate` s^�. _ a c� axer� s-.a=te-'a'�` ::� v. �,.��3.,�E �•^=��, ...�t.�..«�..�v.$,_..�,.:,�5'r�:.'"7.�.. k�.-aT._>�i `i., ',�"�t s, -r� �ri� �, .ae w -,�"+� ��ri�,4�a§<H �T':��µ V6 a i ... .;. :-3,�„i -. £ rii _" 'i'z�.,�'� `_.. .Sni..' .r`�.W4�tt .�r�; :.r` �..4Y` •e. #�?�a.'+_r.:.,:«>t.4- .�'Ptr-,:;;_' r' tea,. *w .[,,.� �.•. 41 h �,t,-.sai�' +�+,L.. ..- �e a 'v -Y`✓a .ni x. .�i'^" 4. �r x'ti �"�r' '^R'$i a .x 4 . -1 3 G4 r��u'•F'�y., Is this site within 45 miles of the Canadian Yes ❑ CPUC PACKAGE Yes ❑ or Mexican border? No 21 SUBMITTED? No Q If PCS,field strength at border of (CPUC MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO PCS Service Area: <-94dbm CONSTRUCTION) ANALOG/CDMA: Planned In-Service Date: PLEASE CONFIRM IN- PLEASE ATTACH 4/15/2006 SERVICE(BY E-MAIL) SITE CONTOUR& WITHIN 24 HOURS RADIAL DATA MICROWAVE CONCURRENCE If there is or is to be a licensed Verizon Wireless microwave associated with this tower,the information on the datasheet must be reviewed and concurred with by the Regional microwave engineer. Are there microwave facilities associated with this cell site? Yes ❑ No 0 reless RF Compliance Reporting Form Site ID: Page Mill Highlands Market: San Jose Address: 27210 Altamont Rd City: Los Altos Hills I State: CA Zip: Multicarrier Facility Yes ❑ No Q 16roadcast Yes ❑ No Q Note: All collocated rooftops and towers collocated with high power broadcast(AM/FM,TV UHFNHF,etc.) must be evaluated by a qualified consultant. Site Evaluated By: R.Bentson Evaluation Date: 8/30/2005 (if different than below) FCC regulations require the power of other RF transmitters collocated on the same building, antenna structure or immediate vicinity, be included when calculating total RF power density at a site. The above noted site is in compliance with FCC requirements for human exposure to radio frequency(RF). Compliance has been accomplished as follows(check one): ❑ RF power density levels are below the MPE for general population/uncontrolled environments in accessible areas. (Entire area green/blue on roofview print.) ❑ RF power density levels are below the MPE for occupational/controlled environments, access to areas in excess of the MPE for general populationfuncontrolled exposure has been restricted to only trained and authorized employees,and the required signage posted. (any areas of yellow on roofview print.) ❑ RF power density is above the MPE for occupational/controlled environments,access to the site has been restricted to only trained and authorized employees,site specific procedures have been developed,and the required signage posted. (any areas of red on roofview print.) Q TCM Method used. RF power density levels are less than 5%of general population/ uncontrolled MPE. Lowest Transmit Frequency: 880 Mhz Input Power to Antenna: 100 watts Mounting Height to bottom of Antenna: 61 Feet Attach TCM, Roofview AntennaMap/AntennaData worksheets or a copy of the Site Evaluation Report for consultant evaluated sites. Indicate any Site Specific Procedures such as reducing power or scheduling work at off peak hours. Technician Name Date A copy of this report must be maintained at the Regional office with a copy, including all supporting documentation forwarded to the Network Regulatory Group. Verizon Wireless—Proprietary For Internal Use Only Site Name: Page Mill Highlands Market: San Jose Date: 8/30/2005 Tower Compliance Matrix Minimum Mounting Height in feet Measured from the base of the Antenna Version 2.3 Input Power to Antenna(watts) 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 Sector-Cellular 800(120 deg) 33 331 351 40 44 48 52 551 591 62 641 671 70 72 75 77 80 821 841 86 881 901 92 94 96 Sector-Cellular 800(105 deg) 33 331 371 42 47 51 55 591 62 66 69 721 75 77 80 82 85 871 90 92 941 96 98 100 102 Sector-Cellular 800(90 deg) 33 33 40 46 51 55 60 641 67 71 74 77 80 83 86 89 91 94 97 99 101 104 106 108 110 Sector-Cellular 800(75 deg) 33 36 43 51 55 60 65 69 73 77 81 84 88 91 94 97 100 103 106 108 111 113 116 118 121 Sector-Cellular 800(60 deg) 33 40 48 55 62 67 72 77 82 86 90 94 98 102 105 108 112 115 118 121 124 127 129 132 135 Sector-Cellular 800(45 deg) 33 46 55 641 711 77 83 89 94 99 104 108 113 117 121 125 128 132 136 139 142 146 149 152 155 Sector-Cellular 800(30 deg) 40 55 67 77 86 94 101 108 115 121 127 132 137 142 147 152 157 161 166 170 174 178 182 186 189 Omni-Cellular 800 33 331 33 33 33 33 33 38 40 42 44 46 47 49 51 52 54 551 57 581 601 61 62 64 65 Sector-Cellular 880(120 deg) 33 33 33 38 42 46 491 531 56 59 61 64 66 69 71 73 76 78 80 821 84 86 87 89 91 Sector-Cellular 880(105 deg) 33 33 35 40 45 49 531 561 59 62 65 68 71 73 76 78 81 83 85 871 89 91 93 95 97 Sector-Cellular 880(90 deg) 33 33 38 43 48 53 57 60 64 67 70 73 76 79 82 84 87 89 92 94 96 98 101 103 105 IZ Sector-Cellular 880(75 deg) 33 34 41 47 53 57 62 66 70 73 77 80 83 86 89 92 95 98 100 103 105 108 110 112 115 M Sector-Cellular 880(60 deg) 33 38 46 53 591 64 69 73 78 82 86 89 93 96 100 103 106 109 112 115 117 120 123 125 128 % Sector-Cellular 880(45 deg) 33 43 53 60 67 73 79 84 89 94 98 103 107 111 115 118 122 125 129 132 135 138 141 144 147 = Sector-Cellular 880(30 deg) 3853 64 73 82 89 96 103 109 115 120 125 130 135 140 144 149 153 157 161 165 169 172 176 180 d Omni-Cellular 880 33 33 33 33 33 33 331 361 38 40 42 43 451 47 48 50 . 51 53 54 55 57 58 59 60 62 p- Sector-PCS 1900(120 deg) 33 33 33 33 33 36 38 41 43 46 48 50 52 53 55 57 59 60 62 63 65 66 68 69 71 L Sector-PCS 1900(105 deg) 33 33 33 33 35 38 41 44 46 48 51 53 55 57 59 61 62 64 66 68 69 71 72 74 75 LL Sector-PCS 1900(90 deg) 331 331 33 34 381 41 44 47 50 521 55 57 59 61 63 651 671 69 711 731 751 76 78 791 81 'E Sector-PCS 1900(75 deg) 33 331 33 37 41 45 48 51 54 57 60 62 65 67 69 711 731 76 781 791 811 83 85 871 89 to Sector-PCS 1900(60 deg) 33 331 36 41 46 50 53 57 60 63 66 69 72 75 77 79 82 84 86 89 91 93 95 971 99 Sector-PCS 1900(45 deg) 33 34 41 47 52 57 611 65 69 73 76 79 83 86 89 91 94 97 99 102 104 107 109 111 114 h Sector-PCS 1900(30 deg) 33 41 50 57 63 69 751 79 84 89 93 97 101 104 108 111 115 118 121 124 127 130 133 136 139 Omni-PCS 1900 33 33 33 33 33 33 331 331 33 33 331 33 35 361 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 471 48 Paging 150(6'Apt.) 33 33 33 331 351 38 401 431 46 481 501 52 54 56 58 60 62 63 65 67 68 70 71 73 74 Paging 150(2'Apt.) 33 38 46 52 59 63 68 73 77 81 85 89 92 95 99 102 105 108 111 114 116 119 122 124 127 Paging 450(6'Apt.) 331 331 33 33 33 33 33 36 38 40 41 43 45 46 48 491 51 52 54 55 56 57 59 60 61 Paging 450(2'Apt.) 33 33 39 43 48 52 56 60 63 67 70 73 76 78 81 84 86 89 91 93 95 98 100 102 104 Paging 929(6'Apt.) 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 42 43 Paging 929(2'Apt.) 33 33 33 33 34 37 40 42 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 62 64 66 67 69 70 72 73 Note: For sectorized configurations use the total power of all transmit antennas in a given sector. If the actual input power is not listed, round up to the nearest listed power. If the lowest transmit frequency is not listed round down to nearest list Ve/i m— wlrefess RF Site Compliance Checklist i Site: Page Mill Highlands Site ID: 157417 Market: #REFI Address: 27210 Altamont Rd. City: Los Altos Hil State: #REFI Zip: 94022 Mitigation Required: D No ❑ Yes Notes on Miti ation: RF Mitioa don Responsibility Matrix Proposed Verizon-only site ❑ Proposed Co-located Site(In-compliance) ❑ Proposed Co-located Site(Out of Compliance) ❑ Existing Site(in-compliance) ❑ Existing Site(Out of Compliance) Person Responsible: Completed: Signage Required: Q None . ❑ Notice ❑ Caution ❑ Warning ❑ Guidelines AT1ON t � Q51E Note: If ANY signs are required,they must be k � A accompanied by the Notice to Works- Guidelines for Working Radio Frequency Environments - n-:s r- - � Sign Locations: Notes on Sign Locations: ❑ At fence for the property,gate entrance,or roof door to the ❑ At each antenna sector Chain/Striping Requirements: Chains/Striping Required? Notes on Chain/Stri in : ❑ No ❑ Yes Person Responsible: Completed: Landlord Notification: Does landlord need to be notified of signage or physical mitigation? 0 No ❑ Yes Ve " carrel s NETWORK COMPLIANCE !YLOA es REQUEST FOR CLLI CODE Date: 8/30/2005 Region Contact: Russ Bentson Site Name Pae Mill Highlands Proiect/Site ID# if applicable) 157417 Market Name San Jose Coordinates: NAD 27 LATITUDE 37 ° 21 ' 53 .4411 LONGITUDE 122 ° 09 ' 31 .01 " ---------------- --- --- --- ------- NAD 83 LATITUDE 37 ° 21 S3 .23 " LONGITUDE 122 ° 09 ' 34 .881, Site Address: 27210 Altamont Rd New Construction City County State Zip Los Altos Hills Santa Clara CA 94022 PROJECT/SITE DESCRIPTION i.e.,Cell Site,Microwave Site,Switch,Voicemail,etc. Cell Site Site Activation Date: Regulatory must be notified if this date changes. CLLI Code Requested by: CLLI Code Assigned for Above Referenced Site: Please allow a minimum of 2 business days for a CLL!Code to be obtained. CLLI Code NOT ASSIGNED AT THIS TIME Reason: Regulatory Contact: 4. I NETWORK COMPLIANCE APPROVALS VeRZOAwwess PART 1: CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL Region Date: 08/30/2005 Contact: Russ Bentson Site Name Page Mill Highlands Project/Site ID# 157417 TMarket Name San Jose NAD 27 LATITUDE 37 ° 21 53 .44 " LONGITUDE 122 ° 09 31 .01 " ------------- ---- ---- -----97—-- --- Coordinates: NAD 83 LATITUDE 37 ° 21 .23 ° LONGITUDE 122 ° 09 ' 34 .881, NEW TOWER CONSTRUCTION(VERIZON WIRELESS OWNED STRUCTURES): Have all NEPA Compliance(NEPA Checklist&SHPO)issues been addressed? NEPA CHECKLIST RECEIVED BY Yes ❑ No ❑ SHPO APPROVAL RECEIVED BY Yes ❑ No ❑ MODIFICATION or COLLOCATION:Have NPA Compliance requirements Yes ❑ No ❑ been met? CALIFORNIA ONLY. CPUC package submitted? Yes ❑ No Q All necessary documentation for FCC and FAA compliance must have been received by Regulatory;all required FCC ASR and/or FAA filings have been made and Regulatory must receive all relevant NPA documents prior to Construction Clearance being issued. Relevant NPA documents include FAA/FCC Datasheet Supplement, Tower Owner Certification Letters,Non-Tower Collocation Confirmation Forms,or SHPO approval when applicable. in some cases,a 30-day notification to the FAA or FCC must have expired prior to construction. NOTE: If there are any changes to the parameters of this project as submitted to Regulatory,the site may not be constructed until these changes have been analyzed and approved by Regulatory. Changes to original site parameters will require a revised datasheet. Construction Approved by Regulatory Contact: Date PART 2: IN-SERVICE APPROVAL Items Needed for In-Service Clearance ❑ Schedule A ❑ RFE Compliance ❑ 8 Cardinal information(if external analog site) ❑ FIFE Compliance backup information ❑ 32 dBu contour ❑ Request for CLLI Code ❑ Extension Agreements(if applicable) ❑ ALL ITEMS RECEIVED Per Network Compliance Policy, NEW SITES MAY NOT BE ACTIVATED WITHOUT A CLLI CODE. In-Service Approved by Regulatory Contact: Date ATTACHMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS PROJECT AT WESTWIND BARN To: Neighbors and owners within 500' radius of Westwind Barn—27210 Altamont Road,Los Altos Hills Verizon Wireless is proposing a wireless communication facility at 27210 Altamont Road (Westwind Barn) as part of an ongoing effort to provide improved wireless coverage in Los Altos Hills. The proposal would include a 65' co-location treepole for the placement of antennas, and a 17' x 17' equipment shelter to house the related radio equipment. The proposed Verizon collocation treepole would consist of six (6) panel antennas to be mounted near the top of the treepole in two groupings of three antennas each, with remaining space below for future collocation antennas. The location of the proposed treepole at the rear of the existing barn structure will serve to blend in with an existing row of trees, and has been designed to have minimal visual impact on the surrounding properties. The proposed Verizon equipment shelter will be located at the rear of the subject property along the eastern property line, and will treated architecturally to resemble the existing barn structure with a pitched roof. In addition to seeking a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the proposed use, Verizon is also seeking a Variance to allow for the construction of the equipment shelter within side setback of the property. You will be receiving a mailer from the Town of Los Altos Hills serving as notification of the Planning Commission hearing on October 13, 2005. If you have any questions regarding the project and are unable to attend the Planning Commission Hearing, please contact Jason Smith at (925) 683-5041. Please contact Brian Froelich at (650) 941-7222 ext. 227 with the Town of Los Altos Hills Planning Department if you have any questions regarding the planning process.