My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
240
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
Ordinances
>
1978
>
240
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2016 10:29:12 AM
Creation date
3/18/2016 10:15:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Number
240
Date (Introduced)
5/31/1978
Date (Adopted)
5/31/1978
Description
Amending Article 2 of Chapter 1, Entitled "Business Licenses" of Title 3 of the Los Altos Hills Municipal Code by Amending Sections 3-1.202 to 3-1.204, 3-1.206 to 3-1.210 and 3-1.214, and Repealing Subsection (c) of Section 3-1.204 and Sections 3-1.205 and 3-1.211, Respectively, Thereof
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
V J <br />stitution by reason of the passage of the so-called Jarvis -Gann <br />Initiative, Section 4 thereof would require a two-thirds vote of the <br />qualified electors to impose special taxes with certain exceptions <br />not here applicable. If the interpretation of Section 4 by Messrs. <br />Jarvis and Gann, namely that a special tax is one other than an ad <br />valorem property tax, is correct then business license taxes could <br />not be imposed or amended without the required two-thirds vote. <br />Further, a judicial interpretation of what is meant by the term <br />"qualified electors" would be required because of the deletion of this <br />term from the California Constitution earlier and before the total <br />number of voters to whom the two-thirds vote requirement referred <br />could be determined. <br />In the event Article XIII -A is approved by the voters on June 6, <br />1978, it is necessary to obtain alternate sources of revenue to <br />maintain essential services of the City of the Town of Los Altos Hills <br />by reason of the loss of revenue from the ad valorem tax on real <br />property. <br />The City Council has found and determined that the revised <br />charges imposed by the within ordinance are reasonable and are required <br />to equitably spread the cost of government and City services and to <br />enable the City to maintain a reasonable level of municipal service <br />within the community. <br />If the effective date of the revised charges imposed by the <br />within ordinance is delayed by reason of litigation arising out of the <br />adoption of Article XIII -A, the City will be without adequate income <br />with which to maintain a reasonable level of municipal service within <br />the City thereby causing undue hardship upon the residents of this <br />community. <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.