My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
161
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
Ordinances
>
1969
>
161
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 2:48:55 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 11:17:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Number
161
Date (Introduced)
8/4/1969
Date (Adopted)
8/18/1969
Description
Amending Ordianance No. 78 of Said Town as Amended by Amending the Requirements Relating to Setback Building Lines, Definitions and Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Where a lot abuts on more than one street or easement <br />as specified in (A) above, the 40 foot setback <br />building line shall be required from only one such <br />property line. In such instances the property <br />owner may select the property line provided such <br />choice, in the opinion of the City Manager or his <br />authorized representative, will not be injurious <br />to adjacent properties or the public interest." <br />d) Section 13:60(A) is deleted and there is <br />substituted in the place and stead thereof the following: <br />"The Planning Commission shall grant the <br />requested variance in whole or in part, if from the facts <br />presented in connection with the application, or at the public <br />hearing, it appears and the Planning Commission specifies in <br />its findings the facts which establish beyond reasonable doubt: <br />(A) That there are exceptional or extraordinary <br />circumstances or conditions applying to the <br />property involved including size, shape, topography <br />or surroundings that do not apply generally to other <br />property or uses in the same vicinity and zoning <br />district. <br />(B) That owing to such exceptional or extraordinary <br />circumstances the literal enforcement of the provisions <br />of the ordinance would result in practical difficulty <br />or unnecessary hardship. <br />(C) That the strict application of the zoning ordinance <br />would deprive such property of privileges enjoyed <br />by other property in the vicinity and under identical <br />zoning classification. <br />(D) That the granting of such variance will not be <br />materially detrimental to the public welfare or <br />"OORIO 6 FAISANT <br />AT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.