02/18/1963 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Breyman cont 'd. -2 ( ginutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of Dec. 6, 1962 were read. It was determined that the Planning Commission did not recommend the re- - quirement for easement for a path be repealed, but that an easement be granted to the Town from public road to the westernmost limit of the property abutting Lot 5 of Tract No. 2980; that the path be constructed when and as needed. - Councilman Fowle illustrated what has been required with a sketch on the blackboard. Mr: Myers explained that the real need for when the path should be con- structed has not been established . The City Attorney explained that , so far, the easement was never imposed by the Council ; that it was an offer by Mr. Breyman' s son; that the Council is not authorized to require this easement from Mr. Breyman. • He further stated that the requirements of Tract No. 3280 should be con- sidered on its own merit , and that he would recommend referring the Map back to the Planning Commission. Mr. Myers stated that Mr. Brad Breyman did not state that Mr. Breyman, his father, would dedicate the easement . 4YTL:H TK-iiItrn Councilman Fowle asked Mr. Myers if the paEhirequirement were deleted , would Mr. Breyman be willing to grant the easement . Mr. Breyman answered that he would not as a condition of approval of Tract No. 3280. He stated that he would like to hear the conditions. The Mayor stated that the Map should be resubmitted and referred back to the PlanningCommissionbecause the requirements under which the ap- proval was granted are unacceptable to Mr. Breyman. - He commented there has not been a meeting of the minds. • Mr. Myers said he would urge that the matter be solved without too much delay, and commented on Mr. Breyman' s position with the Hudecs, owners of -Tract No. 3280, stating that this delay will be a great inconvenience to his client and the Hudecs . • Councilman Bowler commented on the public hearing held for Zone 4, stating that there was good turnout at one hearing and that the other one was not so well attended. - Councilman Fowle commented that he would be willing to accept an in lieu payment for a path from Robleda Road to the end of the cul de sac , and accept an easement over Tract No. 2980. Mr. Myers commented that the Town bodies (Planning Commission and Council) have been over this problem and keep coming back over the same area; that he would like the Council to give some determination this evening based on what is presently before them. Mayor Clayton stated that the Council wouldnot depart too far from the advice of the City Attorney. Mr. Paisant recommended the Map be returned to the Planning Commission that the Council not consider the Map piecemeal , but consider it it in its entirety. •