Laserfiche WebLink
OLD BUSINESS:, ,4 .,„, "_1..: : 1. _ i.. <br /> 1. 2raffic. Qtdiaabo.ecNo..i$2. Public Hearing. <br /> The IMay&r declared the Public Hearing open at 8:00 P. M. and asked <br /> gor,.eoamentsifromotbe Floor. • T . „ ,; ;,o _. r, <br /> Thefollbwing persons commented: Mrs. W. Sedlacek, Wildcrest Drive, • <br /> Mr.. P. Sturm, and Mr. David Janssen, Sherlock Road; 'Mr. and •Mrs.. E.: A. <br /> Breymaa, Wildcrest Drive ,. and Mr. Goodman, Rhus Ridge Drive. <br /> Section 12 of the Ordinance and the inclusion or exclusion or certain <br /> private road in the Ordinance was discussed. <br /> The City Attorney explained that if persons residing on certain pn- <br /> -vate roadswished to be excluded, such a request may be directed to. <br /> the Council. -- <br /> Following discussion by the Council. and. comments by Commissioner ' <br /> Garbett, representing the Planning Commission, Mayor Clayton announced- <br /> that a third Public Hearing will be held: on April 15, 1963 at 8:00 PM. <br /> The public hearing was closed at 8:28 P. M, <br /> Councilman Powle suggested that the City Manager contact the press: <br /> for coverage so that persons onprivate roads will know of the <br /> scheduled ltblic Hearing so that they will have sufficient time to <br /> ---:file protests. <br /> yARIANCES:._. _. <. <br /> 1.. Sege T. E. 0139=6.3) Request far Reduction of Setback Requirement <br /> for residence Addition. <br /> The Clerk reported that recommendation for approval was made by the <br /> Planning Commission, <br /> ACTION:. <br /> That the request of T. E. Sege (V-139-63) be approved as recom- <br /> Mended Almr the. Planning Commission.. <br /> _.__. . MOTSON:_ ,.Aiken; SECOND:. Bowler; VOTE: Passed unanimously <br /> D'IVISIONS OF. LARID::. . <br /> 1. Albertswortb. Eete-tea (245-63) 7 lots. Engr. Charles Coburn. <br /> Judge J. Atkinson appealed to the Council, on behalf of Dr. Albertsworth, <br /> to allow relief from the requirement-Iorunderground utilities in the <br /> subdivision on the basis that strict compliance would be a hardship on <br /> ( the subdivider and Would not be in thebest interests of the Town. <br /> The cost of using small steel poles, as opposed to wooden poles, was <br /> discussed. <br /> Councilman Aiken commented that he did not feel that the additional poles <br />