06/03/1963 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

May 27, 1963, recommended approval of application to move a house from • • p .629 Milverton Road, Los Altos to Lot 2 , Tract 3327 on Hilltop Drive. Councilman Bowler commented that this matter was not an item of the .`.Planning Commission' s Agenda, that there is a good deal of public in- terest, and that ,he ,would recommend that the..item be ,returnedto the, , Planning Commission for proper hearing. ACTION: That the application of Gordon Morrison, to move house on Lot 3, . Tract No. 3327, 12135 Hilltop Drive , be referred.back to the Planning Commission for hearing. • eMOTION: Bowler; SECOND: Aiken; The following persons spoke in opposition to the granting of the ap plication: Mr. Lindau, Mr. C. Wirshing, Mr. C. Hagenmaier, and. . Mr: R. Fimmel. . The question was called. VOTE: Passed unanimously - - Mr. Morrison arrived and the Mayor explained that the application was being returned to the Planning Commission . forahearing. Mr. Morrison explained that he had contacted the Building Inspector and felt that he had complied with the provisions of the House Moving Ordi- nance; that he was informed laterthat a hearing would be required, . and that all was required was a letter requesting consideration by the .Planning Commission in order to be- heard at the meeting. He commented on the expense involved in the eventoffurtherdelay. ACTION: That the Council reconsider the last motion. MOTION: .., Fowles : Lost for lack of Second. ACTION: ... . That the matter bereferred back to the Planning Commission for its meeting of June 10, 1963; that notice be mailed to property. ownersinthe area, rather than to wait -for the 2nd meeting in June. • MOTION: Henley; SECOND: Aiken; The •Mayor stated that the letter requesting approval to move house was received on May 271 1963 which was not in time to appear on the print- edAgendaofthePlanning Commission. Councilman Jowle stated that he would like to take action at this meet- ing: (3 Councilman Bowler, Henley and Aiken agreed that the inatter should be referred back to the Planning Commission to be heard at its next meet-: ing. The Question was called.