Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> -2- <br /> lar <br /> 2. Freeway Agreement. <br /> A resume of discussions between the Town Officials and the State <br /> of California Division of Highways was given by the Mayor. <br /> The following persons commented, objecting to any proposed widen- <br /> ing or extension of O'Keefe Lane to Robleda Road or connection to <br /> Josefa Lane : Mr. & Mrs. R. Tracy, Mr. L. F. Wilson, Mrs. S. <br /> Jackson, Mr. A. C. Carmichael , and Mr. M. Weisbart. <br /> Pr. S. W. Treat commented that the connection of Magdalena Rd. , <br /> via Summerhill Avenue and O'Keefe Lane, to Robleda Road has been <br /> nlanned for some time. <br /> Councilmen commented that pedestrian and equestrian crossings ,re <br /> needed, and that the proposed future connection of O'Keefe La.. , <br /> and Josefa Lane is indicated in the General Plan of the town; <br /> ' ,hat access is needed for fire equipment servin4 the area west <br /> of the Freeway. <br /> Fire Commissioner A. S. Alter commented relative to fire protec- <br /> tion of the area, stating that consideration is being given to <br /> a station on the Foothill Campus. <br /> In view of comments and protests , the Mayor referred the matter <br /> of the Freeway Agreement back to the Council's Committee on Free- <br /> ways for further study and submittal of a formal recommendation. <br /> 3. El Monte Road. <br /> Mayor Clayton stated that he had met with Mr. H. Campen relative <br /> to widening of El Monte Road in an effort to secure greater <br /> participation by the County. He reported that Mr. Campen is to <br /> submit figures to the County Public Works Dept. , and that infor- <br /> mation should be available soon. <br /> Discussion was tabled until the next meeting. <br /> 4. Axford Subdivision. <br /> The Clerk p-esented resume of action taken on the F. W. Axford <br /> subdivision, including action taken when the property belonged <br /> to Roy Gover, with regard to well located on Lot 1. <br /> Mr. Roger Mosher, Counsel for Mr. Axford, explained that Mr. <br /> Axford has sold Lots 1 and 2 of Tract No. 3002; that the Heclth <br /> Department 's condition of approval requiring the well loca.,-1 on <br /> Lote sealed, cannot be complied with because the rights to _he <br /> well belong to owners of Lot 7, across Melody Lane , and that che2 <br /> refuse to relinquish this right without a considerable cost to <br /> the owner of Lot 1. Septic Tank Permit will not be granted to <br /> the owner of Lot 1 until the well has been sealed. At this t°me , <br /> Mr. Axford requests the Town to overrule the Health Department s <br /> recommendation and direct them to issue Septic Tank Permits for <br /> Lot 1 and 2. <br /> Following c,ommantn by the City Attorney, and questions by Coun- <br />