Laserfiche WebLink
The Attorney stated that building permits should not be issed, and <br /> that a public hearing will have to be held . <br /> AMENDMENT : <br /> Y That , if Mr. Melchor does not wish to avail himself of this <br /> hr proposal, he may continue with_his..subdivision under the condi- <br /> tions imposed at the meeting of May 7, 1962. <br /> AMENDED BY: Aiken; SECOND : Fowle; VOTE: Passed unanimously <br /> Councilman Henley arrived and Councilman Liken was excused at 9:15 P. M. <br /> 4. Fremont-Manuella Project - Change Order. <br /> The City Engineer submitted a Change Order for relocation of water <br /> lines (Purissima Hills County Water District) in Fremont Road. <br /> The City ;attorney stated that it was his opinion that the Water Dis- <br /> trict should relocate the water lines in the street , but felt that <br /> the Town would have to order the work done and litigate with the <br /> District to have them pay. <br /> It was determinedthat , under the terms of the Change Order, present- <br /> ed by the City Engineer, the Town assumes the cost of relocation of <br /> the water lines . <br /> ACTION: <br /> That the Change Order be approved as proposed by the City En- <br /> gineer. <br /> iOTICN: Henley; SECOND: Fowle; <br /> ROLL CALL: AYES: Henley, Fowle , Deputy Mayor Sherlock <br /> NOES : None <br /> ABSENT: Aiken, Mayor Clayton <br /> ACTION: <br /> That the matter be referred to the Legal Committee and the City <br /> Attorney and that the effort be made by the Legal Committee and <br /> the City :attorney to litigate from the Purissima Hills County <br /> Water District the expenditures made by the City for relocating <br /> the facilities in the road , that the matter of precedent in <br /> similar situations be reviewed and brought to the attention of <br /> the Council . <br /> i"OTI^N: Henley; SECOND: Fowle; VOTE: Passed unanimously <br /> NE',1 B SIITESS : <br /> 1. Home Occupation - Review. <br /> Oerut Mayor Sherlock opened the discussion by reading SEC. 'VI , <br /> Subsec. 6 :10 of Ordinadce 78, which described 'Home Occupation' . <br /> hat Mr. Clark Smith a property o:,rner, on La Rena Drive , reported on his <br /> operation of a _ me: occupation , battling of insecticides . <br /> Remarks were hoard From i`"rs . H. L. Russell and Mrs. E. A. McLaughlin, <br /> residents on La Edna_ Drive objecting to the operation of this type -of <br /> business in a residential neighborhood. <br />