Laserfiche WebLink
fan <br /> COMMITTEE REPORTS: <br /> None. <br /> (( <br /> rLD BUSINESS: <br /> 1. Consideration of Proposition No. 23. <br /> Letter, dated Aug. 2, 1962, from State Senator John F. Thompson rela- <br /> tive to the Senate reapportionment measure, was discussed. <br /> ACTION: <br /> That the matter be tabled. <br /> MOTION: Fowle; SECOND : Henley; <br /> VOTE: AYES: Fowle , Henley <br /> NOES: Aiken, Mayor Clayton <br /> ABSTALNED: Sherlock <br /> ABSENT : None <br /> The Motion was lost. <br /> ACTION: <br /> That the Council go on record in opposition to Proposition No. 23. <br /> MOTION: Aiken; SECOND: Sherlock; <br /> VOTE: AYES: Henley, Sherlock, Mayor Clayton <br /> NOES: Aiken <br /> ABSTAINED : Fowle <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> NEW BUSINES$: <br /> 1. Fernhill Assessment Project - Request for Extension of Time to C6mplete <br /> Improvements. <br /> Letter,from Gerald E. Kunz , Kunz Paving Co. , dated Aug. 23, 1962, fe- <br /> quested an addition fifteen (15) calendar days to complete the imptove- <br /> ments of Fernhill Drive . <br /> ACTION: <br /> That the extension of time , to September 19, 1962, be granted to <br /> Kunz Paving Co. for completion of the Fernhill Assessment Pro- <br /> ject . <br /> MOTION: Henley; SECOND: Aiken; VOTE: Passed unanimously <br /> 2. Fremont-Manuella Project - Change Order and Request for Extension of <br /> Time to Complete Improvements. <br /> Letter, dated August 25, 1962, from the Perham Construction Co. re- <br /> quested a new time limit of September 18, 1962 to complete the improve- <br /> ments of Fremont-Manuella MCS Project No. 1. Mr. Perham stated in his <br /> letter that the delay is being caused by a separate contractor not un- <br /> w der his control or influence. <br /> Mr. Longmire, City Engineer, stated that the request is reasonable. <br />