My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/17/1962
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
City Council Minutes
>
1962
>
09/17/1962
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2016 1:37:06 PM
Creation date
6/2/2016 1:37:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
Date
1962-09-17
Description
Regular Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-3- <br /> Byrd cont'd. <br /> proved , subject to Planning Commission' s recommendation. <br /> 3. Trumbull , Fred W. (238-62) 4 lots . Engr. John Riley. <br /> The Clerk said approval is desired of a resubdivision of Tract No . 2376, <br /> five lot subdivision, into 4 lots. One lot is to be acquired, by the <br /> State , for the Junipero Serra Freeway. <br /> :juestion was raised relative to the abandonment of the existing ease- <br /> ments , and whether the road should be public or private . <br /> It was the opinion of the Council that the road should be a private <br /> road. <br /> R=elative to drainage problems , the suggestion was made that the Im- <br /> provment Flans be presented prior to approval . <br /> ACTIO" : <br /> That the Tentative Nap of Fred W. Trumbull (238-62) 4 lots be ap- <br /> proved, subject to approval of all agencies with particular em <br /> phasis that the City Engineer is to approve the drainage plan. <br /> NOTION: Fowle ; SECOND: Henley; VOTE: Passed unanimously <br /> 4. Fretz-Ciceroni (240-62) 7 lots . Engr. John W. Riley. <br /> Relative to the request that consideration be given the Map , not on the <br /> printed Agenda, the following action was taken. <br /> ACTION : <br /> That the Fretz-Ciceroni Tentative Rap be placed on the Agenda. <br /> MOTIONS: Fowle ; SECOND: Henley; <br /> Relative to requirement for underground utilities , Mr. Riley stated <br /> that existing poles and easements can serve all the lotsi that Lot 7 <br /> may require an additional pole . <br /> Cost and possibility of having wire installed underground was discussed , <br /> and question of where responsibility would lie--with the subdivider or <br /> builder. The Attorney stated that the subdivider is responsible . <br /> The 'Attorney stated that if the Nap is approved , and the Ordinance re- <br /> quiring un?:erground utilities is not yet in effect , the subdivider is <br /> not liable for installing un%erground utilities . <br /> The question was called for. <br /> VOLT: raseed unanimously <br /> 'Recommendations of the Planning Commission were discussed with regard <br /> L. to paths , drainage , and road plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.