11/17/1958 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Roscoe eont'd. The original map showed acc '%r par-ceiti, with drivew�.ys. t�,, stopped short of what i to the f'lanning Commission. Moody Road, and they Put a by specifying non access. -3-. ess from Noody Road to about eight (8) he cul-de-sac which fed the rear groper- s now Unit i,�l. This was not acceptable They wanted no driveways entering onto restrictive easement around Moody Road Mr. Roscoe pointed out the conditions of the County, stating that he went along with them in order to get the subdivision underway. He wanted to realign Adobe Creek to Moody Road, but the County did not want this done. He stated that he was going to put in a normal concrete culvert to take care of the water. The County then agreed that the channel should be moved and required him to put in exten- sive drainage facilities. It was finally decided, by the Planning Commission, that due to the facilities required to be put in, they would require no work to be done on Moody :load. Shortly thereafter., the City 1attorney drew up a bond, in which there was no consideration of any road improvements and nobody mentioned any road improvements. Work was started on that basis. The amount of the bond did not specify any off -tract improvements. The Mayor agreed that the bond was as.Mr. Roscoe had stated in that i did not require road improvements. Commissioner Tantau stated that the Committee did not see how the Town could take any action. He further stated that the in -tract improvements have not been accepted in Unit 71. ,He said the matter of path, etc. for tale Unit are matter for the City Engineer. Mr. Longmire was asked to cor ent on the in -tract improvements for Unit #1. He stated that he had been called, by Mr. Roscoe, to make an inspection, but found that street name signs and monuments had not been installod. He further stated that he had informed Mr. Roscoe that he would make an inspection after all improvements have been made. Relative to engineering plans, Mr. Longmire said there is no problem. The City Clerk was asked for comments relative to the inconsistencies He stated that he based his reasons for bringing this situation to the attention of the Council on the fact that the subdivision was approved subject to the conditions set forth by the County. He :mentioned Item #13 of these provisions which specified improvement of all roads fronting on the property. Commissioner Tantau commented that the Planning Commission did not, in any of its minutes, specifically mention Item #13 --that the subdivider shall do all road requirements spelled out by the County, and furt;.ier that there is no correspondence where there is any re- quireme_it for this road work, He stated that in his opinion there is no action required at this time. Relative to the reauirements of the County at the time the subdivi- sion was being processed, Pr. Roscoe stated that a ten (10) foot dedication, and the improvement of this ten (10) foot section of right-of-way was one of the conditions.