My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/16/1958
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
City Council Minutes
>
1958
>
6/16/1958
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2016 4:04:14 PM
Creation date
7/12/2016 10:27:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
Date
1958-06-16
Description
Regular City Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
cm <br />-3- <br />b) Pacchetti,-T. J. - Tentati�re Trap (109-58) 2 lots. Zngr. Brian. <br />ACTION: <br />That the tentative map of T. J. 17acchetti (109-58) 2 lots <br />be approved as recommended by the Planning Commission, sub- <br />ject to all the conditions and requirements laid down by the <br />Planning Commission and all applicable ordinances. <br />MOTION: Bledsoe; SECOND: Clayton.; Vote: Passed unanimously <br />c) S.aith, Richard C. - Tentative Map (103-58) 2 lots. Engr. Brian. <br />ACTION: <br />That the tentative map of Richard C. Smith (103-58) 2 lots <br />be approved as recommended by the Planning Commission and <br />subject to all terms and conditions laid down by the Plan- <br />ning Commission and all applicable ordinances. <br />MOTION: Bledsoe; SECOND: Treat; VOTE: Passed unanimously <br />d) Fink Horse Ranch Unit #2 - Tentative Map (25-56) 8 lots. Engr. <br />George Nome. <br />T?r. Wendell Roscoe was present and explained the map. <br />Excerpts from minutes of the Planning Commission action on this <br />subdivision were reviewed. <br />Commissioner Sherlock explained that when the map was first <br />considered by the Planning Commission, the requirements of <br />County were followed which did not require the subdivider to <br />improve peripheral roads. The existing problem is relatively <br />whether Mr. Roscoe should be required to improve Moody Road, <br />as required by the existing Ordinance which requires a subdiv- <br />ider to improve peripheral roads. (Final approval by the Plan- <br />ning. Commission on October 8, 1956 did not require this). <br />Yr. Roscoe stated that he had met all the requirements of the <br />Planning Commission and did not feel that this subdivision shoulG <br />not have to meet the renuirements of the existing Ordinance. <br />The City Lngineer stated that the map met all the engineering <br />requiremtns. <br />The Council agreed that action be tabled and that this map be <br />returned to the Planning Cormission for clarification of re- <br />commendation relative to the improvement of Moody Road. <br />e) Gerth, Edwin r. - Final 11ap (95-57) 6 lots. Engr. Brian. <br />ACTION; <br />6-19-58 <br />That final approval be given the Edwin F. Gerth map (95-57) <br />6 lots, as recommended by the Planning Commission, subject to <br />the conditions and requirements laid down by the Planning <br />Commission and all applicable ordinances. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.