Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission: Development Standards • <br /> May 27, 1998 <br /> page 2 <br /> 1. Should garages be permitted to be attached to (or even perhaps associated <br /> with) secondary dwellings? And should they count against the 1,000 <br /> square foot limit? <br /> 2. Should basements be allowed within a secondary dwelling, or should the <br /> basement square footage be counted against the 1,000 square foot limit? <br /> 3. Does increased habitable area affect"affordability" of second units? <br /> The comparison with other cities provides little input into these issues, other than <br /> outlining maximum sizes and in some cases height of second units, intended generally to <br /> insure that secondary dwellings are "subordinate" to the main residence. It is staff's <br /> understandings that other cities deal with the concerns outlined above on a case by case <br /> basis. <br /> Height of Single Story Structures <br /> The Town's Site Development Code and Design Guidelines allow the Planning <br /> Commission and/or Council to limit development to a single story in height on ridgeline <br /> or highly visible lots, but the height of single story structures is not defined. Also, there <br /> has been concern that, under the Town's regulations, even a single story home could be <br /> proposed at or near the maximum 27 foot height. <br /> Most other communities in the comparison matrix do not require single story structures <br /> by Code, other than for accessory buildings. Heights for accessory buildings are limited <br /> in those cities to a maximum of 15-17 feet. A subcommittee of Council and <br /> Commission members considered the issue of single story height in 1996, and attached <br /> are some sketches showing how either single story or two story structures can be <br /> designed to approach 27 feet in height. The subcommittee determined that perhaps the <br /> issue was related more to "floor area", as the Town allows up to 17 feet interior floor to <br /> ceiling heights, plus attics, without counting as additional floor area. Draft language was <br /> developed (also attached) which would require floor area to be counted twice if the floor <br /> to roof height exceeds 17 feet, regardless of attic space. This would limit-single story <br /> structures to a maximum of 24 feet. The Commission should consider whether it wishes <br /> to specify a height limit for single story buildings, or to relate height to floor area, or both <br /> or neither. <br /> Exterior Colors <br /> The recent concern regarding the exterior colors of a new home on Miranda Road has <br /> raised the issue of not only what colors are allowed by the Town's policies,but how those <br /> colors are combined. The Town's current Code and policy language are attached. Staff <br /> has suggested to the affected residents that it may be appropriate to add language to the <br /> policy that allows greater discretion to deny or require public review of color choices if <br /> unusual combinations are proposed. <br /> In the development standards comparison, the cities which require review of colors <br /> generally do so without specific limitations, like light reflectivity (LRV), but with more <br /> general language, such as "earth tones". In most instances, that city's design review <br /> board then considers the proposed exterior colors at the time of design review. Two <br /> jurisdictions have LRV requirements in limited geographic areas of the community <br /> (hillside zones). <br />