HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.3 qs 3
TOWN OF Los ALTOS HILLS February 22, 1995
Staff Report to the Planning Commission
RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A NEW RESIDENCE AND
POOL; LANDS OF BILGER; 25901 Vinedo Lane.
FROM: Linda S. Niles,Planning Director
RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission EITHER:
A. Approve the requested Site Development Permit as revised with the
recommended conditions of approval.
OR
B. Deny the requested Site Development Permit as redvised.
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission reviewed the previous revisions to this application at
their meeting of October 26, 1994 and continued the item again to allow the
applicant another opportunity to redesign to address the following Planning
Commission concerns:
1. Construct accurate story poles depicting the bulk and mass and the height
of the proposed structure on the site.
The applicant erected story poles on February 16, 1995. Photographs of
the story poles from off-site will be available at the meeting.
2. Review and propose an alternate location for the pool so as to move it
further from the neighboring property to the south.
The applicant has rotated the pool to the north east and sited it along
the contours, and submitted a landscape plan to show mitigation planting
from off-site. (A model will be available at the meeting.)
3. Provide some terracing of the back slope so that there is not a steep fill
bank intruding onto the property to the south.
Terracing with 3' to 4' walls below the pool are being proposed at this
time,with considerable planting to mitigate views of the walls and allow for a
more natural looking slope.
Planning Commission
February 22, 1995
Lands of Bilger
Page 2
4. Lower the height of the house and step the roof line and foundation of the
house down the property and the site which is the Town requirement for lots
that are on a hilltop, ridgeline or are highly visible and are located on a steep
slope. Reduce the appearance of flat two story walls from every elevation.
The applicant has added terracing below the pool and set back the
second floor of the house at the back of the project,however, the house has not
been changed to step down the slope.
The Planning Commission needs to review the revised plans, visit the site to
view the story poles, listen to the public testimony and review the photographs
submitted at the meeting and make a determination to approve or deny the
project as redesigned.
Staff is available to answer questions the Commission or community may have.
Attachments
1. Recommended conditions of approval
2. Site plan, cross sections,floor plans, elevations, and landscape plan
3. Written description of the revisions to the plans (letter dated February 6,
1995 from Giuliani and Kull).
Planning Commission
February 22, 1995
Lands of Bilger
Page 3
ATTACHMENT 1
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FOR
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR NEW RESIDENCE
LANDS OF BILGER- 25901 VINEDO LANE
A. PLANNING DEPARTMENT:
1. Any changes or modifications to the approved plans shall be
approved by the Planning Director or the Planning Commission,
depending on the scope of the changes.
2. The property owner shall inform the Town of any damage and
shall repair any damage caused by the construction of the project to
pathways,private driveways, public and private roadways prior to
final inspection and release of occupancy permits and shall provide
the Town with photographs of the existing conditions of the
roadways and pathways prior to acceptance of plans for building plan
check.
3. Two copies of a grading and construction operation plan shall be
submitted by the property owner for review and approval by the
City Engineer and Planning Director prior to submittal of plans for
building plan check. The grading/construction operation plan shall
• address truck traffic issues regarding dust, noise, and vehicular and
pedestrian traffic safety on Vinedo Lane and Elena Road and other
roadways in the area; storage of construction materials; placement
of sanitary facilities; clean-up area (see Engineering Department for
specifications); parking for construction vehicles; and parking for
construction personnel. A debris box (trash dumpster),shall be
placed on site for collection of construction debris. Arrangements
must be made with the Los Altos Garbage Company for the debris
box,since they have a franchise with the oy�n and o other hauler
is allowed within the Town limits. V
4. Prior to final inspection a landscape planting plan sha be —•
reviewed by the Planning Commission. Particular attention shall 6
be given to plantings which will be adequate to break up the view
of the new residence from surrounding properties. A minimum of
eight 24-inch box trees shall be included on the landscape plan to
mitigate the trees being removed. A cash deposit and/or landscape
maintenance agreement may be required to assure that the
Planning Commission
February 22, 1995
Lands of Bilger
Page 4
approved landscaping is planted and maintained. Outdoor
lighting shall be reviewed and approved with the landscape plan.
5. Paint colors shall be chosen by the Tplicant in conformance with
the Town's adopted color board. c�y?�S 7c
6. Fire retardant roofing is required for the residence. ,x
7. Skylights shall be designed and constructed to reduce e itted light
No li hting may be placed within skylight welly.....
_s--A.e....-ee j ci =94,34
8. . • •- • . 'mmi pool ition a/ f P se.„,..,,,r4, .
imir JP
a. Lights shall be low level, low wattage and shall be designed IA`
.._ _, .._.,;_, .24,
so that the source is not visible from off-site.
i
b. Drainage outfall structures shall be constructed and located
to the satisfaction of the Town Engineering Inspector.
pd c. A barrier is required around the pool as setforth in the State
and local standards.
•� • d. Pool equipme t shall be fe ced on all four side for noise
u� �/ mitigation. .i/A9-0 0
9. All existing development, including the house, shall be removed /
prior to final inspection.
B. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT:
10. All conditions stated in William Cotton & Associates' report dated .-)'',-'
February 15, and March 7, 1994, are conditionsioe it.
11. The site drainage associated with the proposed development must 3 r
be designed to avoid concentration of the runoff flow and
whenever possible to maintain the existing rate of runoff. As-built
drainage shall be inspected prior to final inspection, and any
deficiencies corrected to the satisfaction of the Engineering
Department.
12. No grading may be done within ten feet of any property line, with
the exception of the driveway connection to Vinedo Lane. No
grading shall be done between November 1 and April 1. Any
changes to the approved grading and drainage plan during
construction shall first be approved by the Engineering
Department.
Planning Commission
February 22, 1995
Lands of Bilger
Page 5
13. An erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval
by the Engineering Department prior to submittal of plans for building
plan check. This plan shall address slope stabilization on all areas
impacted by the grading included in the requested project. All cut
and fill slopes shall be jute netted and seeded, and the,driveway
must have gravel or base rock during construction. In addition, all
storm drain outlets shall be protected from construction debris.
The contractor and the property owner shall comply with all
appropriate requirements of the Town's NPDES permit relative to
grading and erosion/sediment control.
14. A 10 foot.pathway easement shall de granted over the easterly 10'
of the proposed 30' road right-of-way for Vinedo Lane. A plat and
legal description shall be submitted to the Engineering Department
for preparation of the dedication agreement, and the signed,
notarized document shall be returned to the Town prior to submittal
of plans for building plan check.
15. The location and elevation and height of the new residence,
driveway,.,decking,pool and walls is to be re-certified in writing by
a registered civil engineer or licens nd syv1err . -. the
foundation has been poured an improverfien"ts c►-'structed as a19-nreZ61
being in the approved locations, elevations and hei•'s establis d
by this permit. The height of the residence may be certified at t e
of framing. A letter of compliance shall be submitted to.the Town
prior to final inspection.
16. The applicant shall_dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way on Vinedo Lane.
A plat and legal description shall be submitted to the Engineering
Department for preparation of the dedication agreement, and the
signed,notarized document shall be returned to the Town prior to
submittal of plans for building plan check.
17. The paved surface along Vinedo Lane shall be widened by a
minimum of four and one-half feet along the frontage of the
property,to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department.
mprovement plans shall be submitted and approved prior to submittal of
any plans for building plan,check. The existing driveway located
within the street right-of-way shall be removed prior to final
building approval of the project.
1 >
•
Planning Commission
February 22, 1995
Lands of Bilger
Page 6
18. All public utility services serving solely this property shall be
undergrounded, to the satisfaction of the Town Engineering
Department.
19. The property owners shall provide evidence that a Certificate of
Compliance has been issued, or they will be required to obtain a
Certificate of Compliance prior to submittal of any plans for building
plan check. A legal description and plat prepared by a registered
civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall be provided by the
applicant in addition to the grant deed from the original
subdivision of the property in order for the Town to prepare the
Certificate of Compliance.
20. A recorded restriction shall be required on the property priot to
acceptance of plans for building plan check to inform future buyers that
under the Town's current standards the property is developedclose
to the maximum floor area and development area allowed for the
lot at this time. Any changes would be required to be reviewed by
the Town.
21. Upon completion of the construction, a final inspection shall be
required to be set with the Planning Director and the City Engineer
two weeks prior to final building inspection approval.
CONDITION NUMBERS 2,3, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19 AND 20 SHALL BE
COMPLETED AND SIGNED OFF BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR AND
THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF CONSTRUCTION
PLANS FOR PLAN CHECK BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
Properties residing within the Los Altos School District boundaries must pay
School District fees before receiving their building permit from Los Altos
Hills. The applicant must take a copy of Worksheet#2 to both the elementary
and high school district offices,pay the appropriate fees and provide the Town
with a copy of their receipts.
NOTE: The Site Development permit is valid for one year from the approval
date (until February 22, 1996). All required building permits must be obtained
within that year and work on items not requiring a building permit shall be
commenced within one year and completed within two years.
•
, Giuliani & Kull, Inc.
Engineers:. • Planners ' '• Surveyors .
Cupertino - Oakdale - Auburn
RECEI
- ED
February 6 , 1995
Linda Niles FEB q.0
Planning Director
Town of Los Altos Hills r 'INN or )���< <�1 r'1C {+s I
26379 Fremont Road ,
Los Altos Hills , CA 94022
Subject : Site Development Submittal
Lands of Bilger
Dear Linda:
Thank you for taking the time to meet with us regarding our
submittal of the revised documents for the site development
application on the Bilger ' s property at 25901 Vinedo Lane .
We have spent the past couple of months studying the project
with respect to comments made by planning commission and
neighbors at the October 26 public hearing . In doing so it
became apparent that it would be a good idea to incorporate a
preliminary landscape design into our package in order to
more clearly depict the final look of the project . As you
are aware , the Bilgers have contracted with Peter Shaw to
provide input to the project . His plans are a part of our
submittal to you and show the way this project will blend
into its surroundings . Additionally, the Bilgers have had a
model of the project made which clearly shows how well the
design is suited to the site and should alleviate the
concerns raised at previous meetings .
I would like to take this opportunity to review our
understanding of the commissioner' s and neighbor ' s comments
and identify the steps taken to mitigate their concerns .
From the Planning Commission minutes of October 26 , 1994 ,
pages 3 to 6 , the items discussed were :
1 . Pool and pool equipment location
2 . Stepping down the rear of the house
and stepping back the second story
3 . Lack of garage
4 . Appearance from offsite (both from public roads
as well as from the Trayer property )
5 . Colors
6 . Views from the Wong Residence
7 . The projects conformance with the
design guidelines
20431 Stevens Creek Blvd. • Suite 230 • Cupertino, California 95014 • (408) 257-6446
February G , 1995
Page 2 of 4
The current package addresses these comments as follows :
1 . Pool and pool equipment location
The location of the pool has been rotated , shifted to the
east and dropped to be approximately 10 feet below the
house . This places the pool 47 feet (at the closest
point ) from the southerly (Trayer) property line , with a
landscape retaining wall system incorporated into the
design in order to step the improvements into the slope .
The pool equipment has been moved to the opposite side of
the house , about 50 feet from the northerly (Bergh)
property line .
As discussed at the public hearing , the pool will be
designed to be supported on drilled pier foundations in
conformance with the recommendations of the project soils
engineer .
2 . Stepping down the rear of the house and stepping back the
2nd story.
One of the concerns expressed at several of our meetings
has been the fact that the proposed residence does not
"step with the land. " I would like to point out that the
Bilger ' s lot differs from oth`r lots where we have heard
this comment in that other lots have had a relatively
consistent slope from the road to the rear. The Bilger' s
Lot however , slopes from the road down to a flat pad area
and then from the existing pad down to the rear of the
lot . The proposed grading for this project lowers the
existing pad by 4 feet and sets the new residence on the
lowered pad. We feel that this design is in conformance
with design guidelines IA, IB, IIA, & IIC.
Additionally, we have stepped master bedroom back from
the east of the house by about 20 feet , and removed a
portion of the trellis along the bedroom wing to further
emphasize the fact that the 2nd story bedroom wing is
stepped back from the first floor on both the north and
south elevations . The house is also stepped along the
southwesterly wing at the guest room from 1 story to 2
story. In summary, all elevations of the house show
stepping of the facade .
The landscape walls and pool location discussed in the
item 1 above further emphasize the stepping of the
project .
3 . Lack of garage
It is our clients desire to have a carport rather than an
enclosed garage , similar to their current situation. It
is our understanding that this is not in violation of
current town ordinances .
February 6 , 1995
Page 3 of 4
4&5 . Appearance from offsite/Colors
The planning commission' s concern of the appearance of
this project from offsite has led us to prepare several
new presentations for their review. Incorporated into
Peter Shaw' s presentation will be a view of the project
from the Elena Road/ Robleda intersection. It can be
seen from this exhibit that the proposed house will blend
nicely into the hillside and that , in reference to the
existing stonepine as well as proposed landscaping , the
house is dwarfed. The landscape drawings also show the
effects of the planned landscape mitigation measures in
terms of blending the house with its surroundings . The
model shows the stepped effect of both the landscape and
architectural design. By lowering the existing pad by 4
feet we have enhanced to the desired terracing . The
colors proposed for the new residence are in conformance
with the town' s approved color board .
With respect to views from the Trayer property, the
existing screening will be enhanced with new plantings
which will limit views of the new construction from both
the Trayer house itself and from Vinedo Lane in front of
their house .
6 . Views from the Wong Residence
The Wong ' s have repeatedly expressed their concerns that
the construction of the new residence will block all of
their views . We feel that the cross-sections included in
our drawings combined with a site visit clearly indicate
that the proposed residence will not effect their views
and new construction will be screened by vegetation
between the Wong residence and the Bilgers . The story
poles which will be set for this next meeting and the
model will support this .
7 . The projects conformance with the design guidelines
I would like to take this opportunity to address the
"Town of Los Altos Hills Guidelines for Residential
Design and Land Use" as they relate to this project .
Goal 1 - Retain and enhance the open natural atmosphere
of Los Altos Hills .
As previously stated, the proposed design is
compatible with the existing terrain, siting the
house on the flat pad area of the lot and stepping
the pool and landscaping areas down the hill . We
are retaining and supplementing the existing screen
vegetation along the southerly property line and
plan to plant an orchard on the easterly end of the
property . The driveway follows the existing
terrain, creating an open, rural feeling .
February 6 , 1995
Page 4 of 4
Goal 2 - Design your home to fit the site and to be
unobtrusive in the neighborhood.
The house has been sited to fit the existing constraints
of the property and will be landscaped to blend into its
surroundings . The two story structure is compatible with
similar construction in the area.
Goal 3 - Design your house to minimize the appearance of
bulk.
As can best be seen by the model of the house which will
be available for review at the public hearing , the design
of this house has incorporated many of the town' s
suggestions for reducing bulk. Architectural details
including decking , trellis work, shadowing created by
roof and overhang variation, as well as the narrow width
and "L" shape of the structure and the siting of the
house in such a manner that , from offsite you look over
it to the east or see Vinedo Lane and hills to the west
when viewing it from below all contribute to reducing the
perception of bulk. The colors selected will also help
to blend the house with its surroundings .
Goal 4 - Design for your needs, the needs of the town and
those of your neighbors.
As you know one of the Bilgers primary concerns in
designing their home has been the issue of handicap
accessibility on the first floor. This home was designed
to combine that need with the requirements of the town as
addressed above . We feel that by placing the majority of
the living area of the home ( family room, kitchen, and
bedrooms ) on the north side of the property, and moving
the pool area northerly, away from the existing
residence to the south, we have created a "Neighbor-
friendly" design.
We concur with your summary at our meeting that our
modifications and additional information should help to
clarify our application and will mitigate the concerns
expressed by neighbors and commissioners . At this time we
would like to include Landscape Approvals in our application
and request that this letter be included in the commissioners
packet for the February 14 meeting .
I was happy to hear that you were favorably impressed by the
model that Wendell brought by Town Hall . Please let me know
if there is further information we can provide for the
preparation of your . staff report .
Sincerely,
GIULIANI AND KULL , INC .
Susan Roberts
cc : Cameron Bilger
• TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS --, „:' .
26379 Fremont Road • Los Altos Hills,California 94022 • (415)941-7222 • FAX(415)941-3160
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FES
WORKSHEET #2
EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA AND rt&OR •FSS WI f
• TURN IN WITH YOUR APPLICATION •
PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME 13,iL
PROPERTY ADDRESS a 0 pi f",D L41-
CALCULATED BY C— DATE j — f 1 _ 5,-
1.
1. DEVELOPMENT AREA, (SQUARE FOOTAGE)
Existing Proposed Total
(Additions or Deletions)
A. House and Garage (from Part B) - 1-1-/Do
B. Decking
C. Driveway and Parking 4-C 0w-7 \51.4)€ Y/ •
(Measured 100' along centerline) 7.0 a 6
D. Patios and Walkways 'Cn - q S. ,.4-c
E. Tennis Court . �-
F. Pool and Decking
G. Accessory Buildings (from Part B) •&
H. Any other coverage -E
TOTALS !0,j
•
Maximum Development Area Allowed - MDA (from Worksheet #1)
2. FLOOR AREA (SQUARE FOOTAGE) •
Existing Proposed Total
(Additions or Deletions)
A. House and Garage
a. -1st Floor
b. 2nd Floor - -
c. Attic and Basement
B. Accessory Buildings
a. 1st Floor .
b. 2nd Floor
c. Attic and Basement
TOTALS
Maximum Floor Area Allowed - MFA (from Worksheet #1) ‘, rri
TOWN USE ONLY CHECKED BY DATE 1
Revised 12/09/91 LDJ: MAC HD/ORIGINALS/PLANNING/Worksheet N2
Mrs. Joyce Johnson
25900 Vinedo Lane
Los Altos Hills, CA.
94022
40 (415) 941-4120
<c, °t
February 21,1995
Dear Planning Commission / Town Council:
I am writing in regards to the revised plans on the proposed Bilger's project at 25901
Vinedo Lane. As a neighboring home owner I am not satisfied with the new plans and
feel that they do not meet the Los Altos Hills guidelines. I am mostly concerned about
three issues. First is the aesthetic value of the proposed home. The design of the home
is not compatible with the established neighboring homes and the style of the
proposed home is extremely dominating. My second concern is in reference to the
actual proposed site of the home and the proposed landscaping which do not fit the
terrain and is extremely obtrusive to our view. My third concern is in reference to the
construction plan of this home. My drive way is directly across the street from the
Bilgers and I am concerned that construction trucks will be using our drive way and
orchard as a place to turn around and park their vehicles. I realize that the Bilgers are
wanting to build the home of their dreams, but feel that they should do so in a way that
is harmonious to the neighborhood.
Sincerely, n�
�,e1etco_
Joyce Johnson
Heisting S. & Josephine N. Wong
25932 VITEDo LAME Los ALTOS HILLS Cw WQRNIA 94022-4428 TEL; (415) 941-3335
February 22, 1995
Town of Los Altos$ills
.Attn: Planning Commission
26379 Fremont Road
Los Altos Hills, CA 94022
Subject: Lands of Bilger, 25901 Vinedo Lane- Site Development Permit
Reference: Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated February 22, 1995, etc.
Based on referenced Staff Report.on new information submitted to the Planning Commission and on visual
inspection of the height and locations of the new story poles, subject two-story house design has not been •
modified to meet conditions previously recommended by the Commission, Specifically:
1, Roof line is still higher than what is permitted by ordinances established by the Town of Los Altos
Hills, The Commission's recommendation to lower the roof line has not been incorporated in the latest
update. The existing pad must be lowered as much as necessary,not just by 4 feet as originally
planned, so that the height will conform to ordinance.
2. The minor"stepping of the facade"has not changed anything as far as we are concerned. Our view is
still blocked. The excessive decking still creates unpleasant visual effects. The proposed "screening by
vegetation"between our house and the new construction will not alter the fact that our view will still
be blocked. The proposed vegetation might block the view from our home even more.
3. The Bilger's lot is very similar to all the hilltoplots on the same side on Vinedo Lane. They all `slope
from the road down to a flat pad area and then from the existing pad down to the rear of the lot". (Par.
2 of Page 2,memo from Giuliani and Kull,Inc.Dated 2495). All existing two-story houses on the
same side on Vinedo Lane blend in quite well with the environment and so should the Bilgers' new
house. However, this tall,massive and bulky two-story-with-a-basement-like structur:as designed is
neither compatible with homes in the area nor will it blend in with the neighborhood. The design just
does not fit this lot with an average slope of 22%. Plain and obvious, Its height must be lowered and its
visible decking must be reduced in order to make it more neighbor-friendly.
Again,we are not objecting to the Bilgers building their new home. We are only objecting to the current
massive and bulky design, We therefore respectfully request the Planning Commission to only approve a
design based on: 1)the mandate of City Zoning and Site Development Ordinance standards; 2)the specific
shape and topography of the lot; and 3)the absence of any negative impact to its neighbors. •
Sincerely,:
• //A
rose J,11 i ne;N. Wong
RECEIVED
FEB 221995
TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS '/
gide, o : J�'S/ ,O.rw.
l
February 20. 1995
Town of Los Altos Hills
ATTN:Planning Commission
26379 Fremont Road
Los Altos Hills,CA 94022
SUBJECT: LANDS OF BILGER,25901 Vinedo Lane;Request for a Site Development Permit for a new residence.
We attended the Planning Commission Public Hearings on October 12 and October 26 and expressed our concerns
on the negative impacts of the proposed design. We have reviewed the design changes,and feel the proposed design is
not in accordance with the towns guidelines and policies regarding hilltop restrictions.
This design,if approved as is, will have a great negative impact on our property value, destroy the visual beauty of our
home,infringe on our privacy and dramatically change the rustic look of our neighborhood. We strongly urge the
Planning Commission NOT TO APPROVE this plan as it is currently designed for the following reasons:
1.) The visual impact on our home will greatly lower the value of our property. We have spoken to Gary Campi of Campi
Properties and he has suggested that we have a differential appraisal done,which we are having scheduled when
possible. From a real estate perspective,the mass and location of such a design would have a negative financial effect
on our property.
The Bilger lot is on a hilltop,where the four hilltop houses on that side of the street are all ONE-STORY FACADES from
Vinedo Lane. The three adjacent hilltop neighbors have designs that step down the slope and the houses are actually
TWO-STORY facades visible from the rear of their properties. These homes blend in with the surroundings and are
suited to the sites.
The Bilgers'proposed design is a two story facade from Vinedo Lane to the rear of the residence with ornate decking
engulfing the house(home is actually a three-story facade). The story poles that have been erected to display the bulk
and mass of the proposed home,still are not all in place and the ribbon across the top(as suggested by the Planning
Commission at the October 26th hearing) is non existent. It seems to us that if the Bilgers'were serious in
accomplishing a neighbor friendly design, this would be the first step taken to show the true appearance of their proposed
design. This would give the neighbors whos'properties are affected by the proposed design the opportunity to see the
actual size. Of course that would not include the massive amount of decking that is proposed.We do not believe that this
design could possibly be in conformance with town guidelines and policies.
2.) The location of the pool and the pool pad are still not what we would consider a neighbor friendly design,but rather an
infringing on a next door neighbors'privacy design! Again,this is still directly above our kitchen,deck, Jacuzzi,BBQ
area AND our three year olds playhouse,sandbox and swing! For those of the Planning Commission who have toured
the site,surely you have noticed the close proximity of the proposed pool site to these locations.
We are a family of seven,my husband and myself,and our five children. We spend a lot of quality time together,
barbecuing, playing guitars,singing• playing in the playhouse,enjoying the Jacuzzi,sitting on our deck enjoying the
view,swinging from our tree swing,enjoying the privacy we have. This is one of the main reasons we chose to move to
Los Altos Hills! We love the rural,open feeling and the park-like setting of our property. Our privacy is essential to us.
And our belief is that a tranquil setting in such a busy world is a necessity. This setting is our home and yard! A
swimming pool full of people generates an extremely noisy environment! This proposed location would produce just that
as well as having people breathe down our necks while we spend private family time together. This truly would
infringe on our legal right to privacy.
We are also still concerned with the safety issues involved with the pool in that location. The rotation and 20 feet
relocation is not addressing the concerns of earthquake safety. This is still in an area that if an earthquake bit, the water
mud,dirt and quite possibly the pool coming down the hill would do extreme damage to our property as well as
create a potential safety hazard to my children. There was talk at the last hearing that only one pool in the hills has
come down,well as far as we are concerned that is one pool too many! If you talk to the people living in Los Angeles
about houses and pools coming down,this type of thing happens all the time. An earthquake is an act of God and no
man can predict the outcome or damage. The proposed location of the pool is not an act of God,but a choice and safety
guarantee by the Bilgers',Mr.Wendell Roscoe and Mr.Kull with the understanding that they are responsible and
liable for any potential danger to our children and family,and all property damage that might occur due to earthquakes,
mudslides or any situation that could cause water,mud or the pool to come down the hill despite our strong objections
location and close proximity of the pool..
With the amount of money being allocated to their project,we don't understand why the Bilgers'won't locate their
pool towards the rear of their residence and property instead of placing it between our homes. This could be a neighbor
friendly design! Not only would it solve the issue of privacy for BOThI families but we would feel more secure about
letting our children out to play without worrying about the dangers of a pool directly overhead. We understand that the
leach fields are an issue. We believe that they could be relocated and a pool pad built. We realize this would be quite
expensive but it would solve one of the issues involved and the Bilgers would have their pool. In the case of an
earthquake, the water and mud might rim down our orchard instead of into our home,deck and play-yard.
The Bilgers'may not have the exact desired view from their pool but I'm sure they could landscape their pool area to
make up for any loss of view. This is a neighbor friendly idea that would solve part of the privacy issue. lithe
Bilgers'arenotagreeable to a reasonable compromise,and the relocation of the pool is not an option or choice,we wouk
have to question whether the property is even suitable for a pool site.
3.) The offsite appearance of the size and bulk of the proposed hilltop residence will dramatically change the appearance of
our rustic neighborhood. We keep seeing in the Bilger's plans that this will fit in with similar construction in the area.
Where are these residences? Are they hilltop?Do they have the acreage to support these designs? This Planning
Commission has said on more than one occasion that this type of design belongs on a flat one acre lot. In the towns
policies it also is suggested that hilltop development is to be unobtrusive from offsite. This design is not in compliance
with that goal. It does not fit in to the hilltop neighborhood. Quite frankly,this proposed design is more massive than
the new mansions built on flat acre lots on La Paloma! They are quite ornate,stand out and are only ONE-STORY!
We hope that Los Altos Hills doesn't allow pink palaces to be placed on its hilltops and that the natural terrain's are
not turned into concrete parking lots. Let's not turn our town into a San Francisco with houses on top of one another!
If the proposed development plan is approved as currently submitted,the negative impact on the mental and emotional
states of all of our family members will be devastating, along with the economic value of our property. We have spoken with
a real estate attorney about this matter and will retain him if necessary to represent us and will exhaust all legal actions avails
to us to defend our rights.
We strongly urge the Planning Commission NOT TO APPROVE subject development plan until is has been modified to a
reasonable design within the town codes so that it will not infringe on our rights. Also,relocation of the pool so it
will not infringe on our privacy nor be a potential hazard to our family.
Sincerely yours,
cam,
John and Patricia Trayer
FEB-21-1995 16:23 FROM Giuliani a Kull, Inc TO [24] TOWN OF LAH P.02
-
• - . • -. .•. ...• •
TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS
26379 Fremont Road • Los Altos Hills,California 94022 • (415)9414222 • FAX(415)941-3160 • !
• PLANNING DEPARTMENT
• WORKSHEET #2• 4
EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FLOOR AREA
• TURN IN WITH YOUR APPLICATION •
PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME
PROPERTY ADDRESS ADDRESS 0 I V/td r) 0
9 5- -
CALCULATED BY 4, . DATE — -
1. DEVELOPMENT AREA (SQUARE FOOTAGE)
Existing Proposed Total
(Additions or Deletions)
A. House and Garage (from Part B) 41,01
B. Decking
C. Driveway and Parking 4CtQ1- \52o
(Measured 100'along centerline) - i-I cReR 5t
fe..4yrr .245
D. Patios and Walkways o-r-pce - `1 • ‘,5••40
•
E. Tennis.Court
F. Pool and Decking 1543
G. Accessory Buildings (from Part B) .
H. Any other coverage • -49
TOTALS
• Maximum Development Area Allowed - MDA (from Worksheet #1) L go/D
2. FLOOR AREA (SQUARE FOOTAGE) •
Existing Proposed - Total
•
(Additions or Deletions)
A. House and Garage
• a. -1st Floor
b. 2nd Floor ?o&0
c. Attic and Basement <
• B. Accessory Buildings
a. lst Floor
b. 2nd Floor
c. Attic and Basement
TOTALS . Lko
Maximum:Floor Area Allowed - MFA (from Worksheet #1) i-‘Q ?')
TOWN USE ONLY CHECKED BY • DATE
Revised 12/09/91 LDJ: MAC HD/ORICINALS/PLANNINC/Worksheet#2
LOSALTOS HILLS
WV,
im
CALIFORNIA FAX COVER PAGE
DATE: g/ 1 6
TO: SG/Sitkili bei
dS
COMPANY:
PHONE NUMBER:
RECEIVING FAX NUMBER: 4/02 g.5? -6 S
FROM: i-/NDA/L-4/1/ 2
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover):
COMMENTS: PL S V& WO e IC stied- #a
0-s-6, e 4- R E t K
---TriffrocSI
kiltie
— 7Ai/e4 )74
—
rv..•' A 74 7.)1 a,61 >14,
1 / >14 7-
•
_/
/ S74-- nom+'
Original o olio Yes
g
26379 Fremont Road No
Los Altos Hills (-7
California 94022 CC/K�7— �2 _
4 1 5 / 9 4 1 - 7 2 2 2
Fax 415/941-3160 f
FEB-21-1995 14 33 FROM Giuliani & Ku 11, Inc TO [24] TOWN OF LAH P.02
•
TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS
• 26379 Fremont Road • Los Altos Hills,California 94022 • (415)941-7222 • FAX(415)941-3160
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
• WORKSHEET#2
EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FLOOR AREA
• TURN IN WITH YOUR APPLICATION •
PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME BI LAi
PROPERTY ADDRESS a al O t V/ti ).0 L- f_ .
CALCULATED BY � J DATE l — / 9 _ E •
i. PEVELQ)PMENT AREA (SQUARE FOOTAGE)
Existing Proposed Total
(Additions or Deletions)
A. House and Garage (from Part B) 46905
B. Decking AA
C. Driveway.and Parking.4.C fl z 7 152o ems'/.
(Measured 100'along centerline) - 7D t-1( ) ao7 50
D. Patios and Walkways ;•
ass
E. Tenrnis.Court
F. Pool and Decking l 543 .
G. Accessory Buildings (from Part B) •�
H. Any other coverage -s
TOTALS . . +03
• Maximum"Development Area Allowed - MDA (from Worksheet #1) 6)01
Z FLOOR AREA (SQU j--:;%�•CE)
Exis: • Proposed - . Total
S S�o uJ n (Additions or Deletions)
A. House ani/ • age a n k r S .
a. -1st . ., dc;\--e-.8 e c �e e u
b. 2nd ' • b a
�� e q o n
c. Attic and
B. Accessory Buildings
a. 1st Floor •
b. 2nd Floor
•
c. Attic and Basement
TOTALS
Maximum Floor Area Allowed - MFA (from Worksheet #1) •��v j�
I TOWN USE ONLY CHECKED BY DATE
Revised 12/09/91 LDJ: MAC HD/ORIGINALS/PLANNINC/Worksheet 1.2
Kull, Inc
* �•tj', rEn:eilt$ 'e I 4Pla64WS
Cupertino - Oakdale - Auburn
RECiV o
D
February 6 , 1995
Linda Niles FER Q VS
Planning Director
Town of Los Altos Hills rnMN (fF' `, til �� f`/�
I i
26379 Fremont Road
Los Altos Hills , CA 94022
Subject : Site Development Submittal
Lands of Bilger
Dear Linda:
Thank you for taking the time to meet with us regarding our
submittal of the revised documents for the site development
application on the Bilger ' s property at 25901 Vinedo Lane .
We have spent the past couple of months studying the project •
with respect to comments made by planning commission and
neighbors at the October 26 public hearing . In doing so it
became apparent that it would be a good idea to incorporate a
preliminary landscape design into our package in order to
more clearly depict the final look of the project . As you
are aware , the Bilgers have contracted with Peter Shaw to
provide input to the project . His plans are a part of our
submittal to you and show the way this project will blend
into its surroundings . Additionally, the Bilgers have had a
model of the project made which clearly shows how well the
design is suited to the site and should alleviate the
concerns raised at previous meetings .
I would like to take this opportunity to review our
understanding of the commissioner' s and neighbor ' s comments
and identify the steps taken to mitigate their concerns .
From , the Planning Commission minutes of October 26 , 1994 ,
pages 3 to 6 , the items discussed were :
1 . Pool and pool equipment location •
2 . Stepping down the rear of the house
and stepping back the second story
3 . Lack of garage
4 . Appearance from offsite ( both from public roads
as well as from the Trayer property )
5 . Colors
6 . Views from the Wong Residence
7 . The projects conformance with the
design guidelines
20431 Stevens Creek Blvd. • Suite 230 • Cupertino, California 95014 • (408) 257-6446
February G , L995
Page 2 of 4
The current package addresses these comments as follows :
1 . Pool and pool equipment location
The location of the pool has been rotated , shifted to the
east and dropped to be approximately 10 feet below the
house . This places the pool 47 feet ( at the closest
point ) from the southerly ( Trayer) property line , with a
landscape retaining wall system incorporated into the
design in order to step the improvements into the slope .
The pool equipment has been moved to the opposite side of
the house , about 50 feet from the northerly (Bergh)
property line .
As discussed at the public hearing , the pool will be
designed to be supported on drilled pier foundations in
conformance with the recommendations of the project soils
engineer .
2 . Stepping down the rear of the house and stepping back the
2nd story.
One of the concerns expressed at several of our meetings
has been the fact that the proposed residence does not
"step with the land . " I would like to point out that the
Bilger' s lot differs from other lots where we have heard
this comment in that other lots have had a relatively
consistent slope from the road to the rear. The Bilger' s
Lot however , slopes from the road down to a flat pad area
and then from the existing pad down to the rear of the
lot . The proposed grading for this project lowers the
existing pad by 4 feet and sets the new residence on the
lowered pad. We feel that this design is in conformance
with design guidelines IA, IB, IIA, & IIC.
Additionally, we have stepped master bedroom back from
the east of the house by about 20 feet, and removed a
portion of the trellis along the bedroom wing to further
emphasize the fact that the 2nd story bedroom wing is
stepped back from the first floor on both the north and
south elevations . The house is also stepped along the
southwesterly wing at the guest room from 1 story to 2
story. In summary, all elevations of the house show
stepping of the facade .
The landscape walls and pool location discussed in the
item 1 above further emphasize the stepping of the
project .
3 . Lack of garage
It is our clients desire to have a carport rather than an
enclosed garage , similar to their current situation. It
is our understanding that this is not in violation of
current town ordinances .
February 6 , 1995
Page 3 of 4
4&.5 . Appearance from offsite/Colors
The planning commission ' s •concern of the appearance of
this project from offsite has led us to prepare several
new presentations for their review. Incorporated into
Peter Shaw' s presentation will be a view of the project
from the Elena Road/ Robleda intersection. It can be
seen from this exhibit that the proposed house will blend
nicely into the hillside and that , in reference to the
. existing stonepine as well as proposed landscaping , the
house is dwarfed. The landscape drawings also show the
effects of the planned landscape mitigation measures in
terms of blending the house with its surroundings . The
model shows the stepped effect of both the landscape and
architectural design. By lowering the existing pad by 4
feet we have enhanced to the desired terracing . The
colors proposed for the new residence are in conformance •
with the town' s approved color board .
With respect to views from the Trayer property, the
existing screening will be enhanced with new plantings
which will limit views of the new construction from both
the Trayer house itself and from Vinedo Lane in front of
their house .
6 . Views from the Wong Residence
The Wong ' s have repeatedly expressed their concerns that
the construction of the new residence will block all of
their views . We feel that the cross-sections included in
our drawings combined with a site visit clearly indicate
that the proposed residence will not effect their views
and new construction will be screened by vegetation
between the Wong residence and the Bilgers . The story
poles which will be set for this next meeting and the
model will support this .
7 . The projects conformance with the design guidelines
I would like to take this opportunity to address the
"Town of Los Altos Hills Guidelines for Residential
Design and Land Use" as they relate to this project .
Goal 1 - Retain and enhance the open natural atmosphere
of Los Altos Hills .
As previously stated, the proposed design is
compatible with the existing terrain, siting the
house on the flat pad area of the lot and stepping
the pool and landscaping areas down the hill . We
are retaining and supplementing the existing screen
vegetation along the southerly property line and
plan to plant an orchard on the easterly end of the
property . The driveway follows the existing
terrain , creating an open, rural feeling .
February 6 , 1995
Page 4 of 4
Goal 2 - Design your home to fit the site and to be
unobtrusive in the neighborhood.
The house has been sited to fit the existing constraints
of the property and will be landscaped to blend into its
surroundings . The two •story structure is compatible with
similar construction in the area.
Goal 3 - Design your house to minimize the appearance of
bulk.
As can best be seen by the model of the house which will
be available for reView at the public hearing , the design
of this house has incorporated many of the town' s
suggestions for reducing bulk. Architectural details
including decking , trellis work, shadowing created by
roof and overhang variation, as well as the narrow width
and "L" shape of the structure and the siting of the •
house in such a manner that , from offsite you look over
it to the east or see Vinedo Lane and hills to the west
when viewing it from below all contribute to reducing the
perception of bulk. The colors selected will also help
to blend the house with its surroundings .
Goal 4 - Design for your needs, the needs of the town and
those of your neighbors .
As you know one of the Bilgers primary concerns in
designing their home has been the issue of handicap
accessibility on the first floor. This home was designed
to combine that need with the requirements of the town as
addressed above We feel that by placing the majority of
the living area of the home ( family room, kitchen, and
bedrooms ) on the north side of the property, and moving
the pool area northerly, away from the existing
residence to the south, we have created a "Neighbor-
friendly" design.
We concur with your summary at our meeting that our
modifications and additional information should help to
clarify our application and will mitigate the concerns
expressed by neighbors and commissioners . At this time we
would like to include Landscape Approvals in our application
and request that this letter be included in the commissioners
packet for the February 14 meeting .
I was happy to hear that you were favorably impressed by the
model that Wendell brought by Town Hall . Please let me know
if there is further information we can provide for the
preparation of your staff report .
Sincerely, •
GIULIANI AND KULL , INC .
Susan Roberts
cc : Cameron Bilger
•
TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS � � /
26379 Fremont Road • Los Altos Hills,California 94022 • (415) 941-7222 • FAX(415)941-3160
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
icEe. (� ys
WORKSHEET #2 •
EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA AND91i
• TURN IN WITH YOUR APPLICATION •
PROPERTY OWNERS NAME / Z
PROPERTY ADDRESS a Z Gl 0 j v /1,.`, u
CALCULATED BY � 1 DATE l - 9 _ 67
1. DEVELOPMENT AREA (SQUARE FOOTAGE)
Existing Proposed Total
(Additions or Deletions)
A. House and Garage (from Part B) • - I-605
5
B. Decking
C. Driveway and Parking \5?4:
(Measured 100' along centerline) - '1D 1-117-0 ,;.1<5.0
D. Patios and Walkways `°'n
c-�F-�, 9 s 3.4J
E. Tennis Court �.
F. Pool and Decking
G. Accessory Buildings (from Part B) -&
H. Any other coverage
TOTALS gj9(a:5
j
Maximum Development Area Allowed - MDA (from Worksheet #1) J i
2. FLOOR AREA (SQUARE FOOTAGE)
Existing Proposed Total
(Additions or Deletions)
A. House and Garage
a. -1st Floor
b. 2nd Floor -
c. Attic and Basement
B. Accessory Buildings
a. 1st Floor
b. 2nd Floor
c. Attic and Basement
TOTALS
o9;.
Maximum Floor Area Allowed - MFA (from Worksheet #1)
TOWN USE ONLY I CHECKED BY • DATE
Revised 12/09/91 LDJ: MAC HD/ORICINALS/PLANNING/Worksheet 02
. ' .0, . '2e-v
Planning Commission
October 12, 1994 Stst5M r\ 2 .6-G1�
Lands of Bilger
Page 9
approved landscaping is planted and maintained. Outdoor
lighting shall'bereviewed and approved with the landscape plan.
5. Paint colors shall be chosen by the applicant in conformance with
the Town's adopted,color board.,.
6. Fire retardant roofing is required for the residence.
7. Skylights shall be designed and constructed to reduce emitted light.
No lighting may be placed within skylight wells.
8. Standard swimming pool conditions:
•
a. Lights shall be low level,low wattage and shall be designed
so that the source is not visible from off-site.
b. ;. Drainage,outfall structures shall be constructed and located
to the satisfaction;of the Town Engineering Inspector.
c. A barrier is required around the pool as setforth in the State
and local standards:
d. Pool equipment shall be fenced on all four sides for noise
• - .. mitigation.} ,
9. All existing development,including the house, shall be removed
prior to final inspection;;-
- a,
B. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT:
10. All conditions stated in William Cotton&Associates' report dated
February 15, and March 7, 1994, are conditions of this permit.
11. The site-drainage associated with the proposed development must
be designed to avoid concentration of the runoff flow and
whenever possible to maintain the existing rate of runoff. nal
. : •-• . e !--_ • -
: . : • . : . , : , - _- . As-built
drainage shall be inspected,prior to final inspection, and any
deficiencies corrected to the satisfaction of the Engineering
Department.
12. No grading may be done within ten feet of any property line,with
the exception of the driveway connection to Vinedo Lane. No
grading shall be done between November 1 and April 1. Any
• Planning Commission
October 12, 1994
Lands of Bilger
Page 10
changes to the approved grading and drainage plan during
construction shall first be approved by the Engineering
Department.
13. An erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval
by the Engineering Department prior to submittal of plans for building
plan check. This plan shall address slope stabilization on all areas
impacted by the grading included in the requested project. All cut
and fill slopes shall be jute netted and seeded, and the driveway
must have gravel or base rock during construction. In addition, all
storm drain outlets shall be protected from construction debris.
The contractor and the property owner shall comply with all t-
appropriate requirements of the Town's NPDES permit relative to (2.0.
grading and erosion/sediment control.''' volsdo`
ire -(v43
to
14, A*foot pathway easement shall de granted overyinedo Lane. A
plat and legal description shall be submitted to the Engineering
Department for preparation of the dedication agreement, and the
signed,notarized document shall be returned to the Town prior to
submittal of plans for building lan check.
,edea! •tom �,�wev-) d�°�'x'�pooh �1
15. The locatiorof thet( is to be re-certified in writing by a
registered.civil engineer or licensed land spry' after the
foundation has been pourestgai in the approved locations, ' 4 +ris
established by this permit. lie height of the residence be
certified at time of framing. A letter of compliance shall be
submitted to the Town prior to final inspection.
16. The applicant shall dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way on Vinedo Lane.
A plat and legal description shall be submitted to the Engineering
Department for preparation of the dedication agreement, and the •
signed,notarized document shall be returned to the Town prior to
submittal of plans for building plan check.
17, The paved surface-along.Vinedo;Lane shall-be widened by a
minimum of four and one-half feet along the frontage of the
property., to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department.
mprovement plans shall be submitted and approved prior to submittal of
any plans for building plan check. The existing driveway located
within the street right-of-way shall be removed prior to final
building approval of the project.
Planning Commission
October 12, 1994 -" • • ;
Lands of Bilger
Page 11
18. All public utility services seg v'n` ool .thus P e shall,be,
underground ,nee : . .
• /
1•. Applicant shall be required • co ect to sanitar se ier service. e
c .sest existi main is loc.ted a*proximately 00' aay at 25:40
Vi. edo Lan:. 10' sanit• y sew: easement hall b: grante• alon:
the easterly pro erty lin:. A plat :nd legal-:escrip '.n sha be
sub itted o the Engin--ring De•artmen for prep atio of the
ded alio' agree i ent, .nd the sig ed, •tarized do -nt shall • ✓
return=• to the T• . • prior to subm ., of plans for bu' , 'ng plan check.
20. The property owners shall provide evidence that a Certificate of
Compliance has been issued,or they will be required to obtain a
Certificate of Compliance prior to submittal of any plans for building
plan check. b- MSC-rite-` * FL -c PeaPIeep 3`f .. .c .S' 02,
5 - PLL-t2 P( .J t - facePL,\ I vnt:74 -To .4
21. Upon completion of the construction, a final inspection shall bei a�
required to be set with the Planning Director and the City Engineer
two weeks prior to final building inspection approval.
rMF3 v¢I!n i ti,�aL
uaoNv NS 11)-.1
CONDITION NUMBERS 2,3, 16 17 18 19 AND 20 SHALL BE
111314, De
cTZ--
COMPLETED AND SIGNED OFF BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR AND -1-is.� ...1
THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF CONSTRUCTION
PLANS FOR PLAN CHECK BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT: asar �,t.,P
Properties residing within the Los Altos School District boundaries must pay
School District fees before receiving their building permit from Los Altos
Hills. The applicant must take a copy of Worksheet#2 to both the elementary
and high school district offices,pay the appropriate fees andprovidethe Town
with a copy of their receipts.
I 9-
NOTE:
NOTE: The ite Development permit_isvalid-for one-year from the approval
date (until J , 1995). All required building permits must be obtained within
that year and work on items not requiring a building permit shall be commenced
within one year and completed within two years.. .
•
..••••
•• •
Alco
'y TREE SERVICE towrl 1994
Free Estimates•Expert Trimming
• MATT LIDDICOAT,P.O.Box 1515,Palo.Alto,CA 94302 TO 11 OF Los FUTON 14'vv
(415)325-1061
DATE: - i7 -4 `-f
NAME: C ci.wc. `p`' \ ;.\ e ‘2- PHONE. HOME. `?L/7- ca' - BUS:
ADDRESS: Z '-t C % V r i.i eel- CITY: L.-4-if ZIP: 7 <«%2
YES.. NO
- , BID=INCLUDES:
1] Chipping brush: remove leave., ❑, .
PP�ngof
2] Cut wood into 16" lengths and pile
at base of tree ❑ 0
3] Stack wood at another location 0 0
4] .Haul wood . ❑ 0
• 5] Fertilize ,0 Y 0
:),-(..LA F`o.. — �j 4-��;c- t F? . t.. ,r �.'_ �ci 1 ) kv„ �\
YiCt S i 4-1AG;(,'` [
-. 7, -4— �J Lee/C
�) r^ rJ J
LA_ -i 1 Gi Y<G' :Lti.. - . . .v._.> 4 .. .} V-L.'ti-C.` ''FC:3' Y .- (42, l'
«0 -.S. VnL:._ . S ._:� ;• v (., -� V Q_. [•'lu.24 b
Ccv"- \�t , l� . � l� G.� —oma✓ + E �\SaS
Cl.,-4, T`�_ ..� 1 ,(LfL: �w u W Ci a ae- C J uX
\,1 « `� ' - -- S o - 7 S f c-s
c S 0 NI
TOTAL:
Terms C.O.D.
Job accepted 0 Job done 0
Source Paid 0 Customer authorization
11
I
1
RECEIVED
FEB 221995
TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS
,el' 4: 51/4°.
February 20. 1995
Town of Los Altos Hills
ATTN:Planning Commission
26379 Fremont Road
Los Altos Hills,CA 94022
SUBJECT:LANDS OF BILGER,25901 Vinedo Lane;Request for a She Development Permit for a new residence.
We attended the Plarming Commission Public Hearings on October 12 and October 26 and expressed our concerns
on the negative impacts of the proposed design. We have reviewed the design changes,and feel the proposed design is
not in accordance with the towns guidelines and policies regarding hilltop restrictions.
This design,if approved as is, will have a great negative impact on our property value, destroy the visual beauty of our
home,infringe on our privacy and dramatically change the rustic look of our neighborhood. We strongly urge the
Planning Commission NOT TO APPROVE this plan as it is currently designed for the following reasons:
1.) The visual impact on our home will greatly lower the value of our property. We have spoken to Gary Campi of Campi
Properties and he has suggested that we have a differential appraisal done,which we are having scheduled when
possible. From a real estate perspective,the mass and location of such a design would have a negative financial effect
on our property.
The Bilger lot is on a hilltop,where the four hilltop houses on that.side of the street are all ONE-STORY FACADES from
Vinedo Lane. The three adjacent hilltop neighbors have designs that step down the slope and the houses are actually
TWO-STORY facades visible from the rear of their properties. These homes blend in with the surroundings and are
suited to the sites.
The Bilgers'proposed design is a two story facade from Vinedo Lane to the rear of the residence with ornate decking
engulfing the house(home is actually a three-story facade). The story poles that have been erected to display the bulk
and mass of the proposed home,still are not all in place and the ribbon across the top(as suggested by the Planning
Commission at the October 26th hearing) is non existent. It seems to us that if the Bilgers'were serious in
accomplishing a neighbor friendly design, this would be the first step taken to show the true appearance of their proposed
design. This would give the neighbors whoa'properties are affected by the proposed design the opportunity to see the
actual size. Of course that would not include the massive amount of decking that is proposed.We do not believe that this
design could possibly be in conformance with town guidelines and policies.
2.) The location of the pool and the pool pad are still not what we would consider a neighbor friendly design,but rather an
infringing on a next door neighbors'privacy design! Again,this is still directly above our kitchen,deck, Jacuzzi,BBQ
area AND our three year olds playhouse,sandbox and swing! For those of the Planning Commission who have toured
the site,surely you have noticed the close proximity of the proposed pool site to these locations.
We are a family of seven,my husband and myself,and our five children. We spend a lot of quality time together,
barbecuing, playing guitars,singing, playing in the playhouse,enjoying the Jacuzzi,sitting on our deck enjoying the
view,swinging from our tree swing,enjoying the privacy we have. This is one of the main masons we chose to move to
Los Altos Hills! We love the rural,open feeling and the park-like setting of our property. Our privacy is essential to us.
And our belief is that a tranquil setting in such a busy world is a necessity. This setting is ow home and yard!. A
swimming pool full of people generates an extremely noisy environment! This proposed Jocation would produce just that
as well as having people breathe down our necks while we spend private family time together. This truly would
infringe on our legal right to privacy.
We are also still concerned with the safety issues involved with the pool in that location. The rotation and 20 feet
relocation is not addressing the concerns of earthquake safety. This is still in an area that if an earthquake hit, the water
mud,dirt and quite possibly the pool coming down the hill would do extreme damage to our property as well as
create a potential safety hazard to my children. There was talk at the last hearing that only one pool in the hills has
come down,well as far as we are concerned that is one pool too many! If you talk to the people living in Los Angeles
about houses and pools coming down,this type of thing happens all the time. An earthquake is an act of God and no
man can predict the outcome or damage. The proposed location of the pool is not an act of God,but a choice and safety
guarantee by the Bilgers',Mr.Wendell Roscoe and Mr.Kull with the understanding that they are responsible and
liable for any potential danger to our children and family,and all property damage that might occur due to earthquakes,
mudslides or any situation that could cause water,mud or the pool to come down the hill despite our strong objections
location and close proximity of the pool..
With the amount of money being allocated to their project,we don't understand why the Bilgers'won't locate their
pool towards the rear of their residence and property instead of placing it between our homes. This could be a neighbor
friendly design! Not only would it solve the issue of privacy for BOTH families but we would feel more secure about
letting our children out to play without worrying about the dangers of a pool directly overhead. We understand that the
leach fields are an issue. We believe that they could be relocated and a pool pad built. We realize this would be quite
expensive but it would solve one of the issues involved and the Bilgers would have their pool. In the case of an
earthquake, the water and mud might run down our orchard instead of into our home,deck and play-yard.
The Bilgers'may not have the exact desired view from their pool but I'm sure they could landscape their pool area to
make up for any loss of view. This is a neighbor friendly idea that would solve part of the privacy issue. If the
Bilgers'are not agreeable to a reasonable compromise,and the relocation of the pool is not an option or choice,we would
have to question whether the property is even suitable for a pool site.
3.) The offsite appearance of the size and bulk of the proposed hilltop residence will dramatically change the appearance of
our rustic neighborhood. We keep seeing in the Bilger's plans that this will fit in with similar construction in the area.
Where are these residences? Are they hilltop?Do they have the acreage to support these designs? This Planning
Commission has said on more than one occasion that this type of design belongs on a flat one acre lot. In the towns
policies it also is suggested that hilltop development is to be unobtrusive from offsite. This design is not in compliance
with that goal. It does not fit in to the hilltop neighborhood. Quite frankly,this proposed design is more massive than
the new mansions built on flat acre lots on La Paloma! They are quite ornate,stand out and are only ONE-STORY!
We hope that Los Altos Hills doesn't allow pink palaces to be placed on its hilltops and that the natural terrain's are •
not turned into concrete parking lots. Let's not turn our town into a San Francisco with houses on top of one another!
If the proposed development plan is approved as currently submitted,the negative impact on the mental and emotional
states of all of our family members will be devastating, along with the economic value of our property. We have spoken with
a real estate attorney about this matter and will retain him if necessary to represent us and will exhaust all legal actions avails
to us to defend our rights.
•
i
We strongly urge the Planning Commission NOT TO APPROVE subject development plan until is has been modified to a
reasonable design within the town codes so that it will not infringe on our rights. Also,relocation of the pool so it
will not infringe on our privacy nor be a potential hazard to our family.
Sincerely yours,
Iktlk
aitAcKtix
John and Patricia Trayer
Mrs. Joyce Johnson
25900 Vinedo Lane
Los Altos Hills, CA.
94022
<,(9 (415) 941-4120
<(/ °h
February 21,1995
Dear Planning Commission / Town Council:
I am writing in regards to the revised plans on the proposed Bilger's project at 25901
Vinedo Lane. As a neighboring home owner I am not satisfied with the new plans and
feel that they do not meet the Los Altos Hills guidelines. I am mostly concerned about
three issues. First is the aesthetic value of the proposed home. The design of the home
is not compatible with the established neighboring homes and the style of the
proposed home is extremely dominating. My second concern is in reference to the
actual proposed site of the home and the proposed landscaping which do not fit the
terrain and is extremely obtrusive to our view. My third concern is in reference to the
construction plan of this home. My drive way is directly across the street from the
Bilgers and I am concerned that construction trucks will be using our drive way and
orchard as a place to turn around and park their vehicles. I realize that the Bilgers are
wanting to build the home of their dreams, but feel that they should do so in a way that
is harmonious to the neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Joyce Johnson
Hosting S. & Josephine N. Wong
25932 MNEDo LANE Los ALTOS HILLS CALIFORNIA 94022-4428 Ta: (415) 941-3335
February 22, 1995
Town of Los Altos Hills
.Attn: Planning Commission
26379 Fremont Road
Los Altos Hills, CA 94022
Subject: Lands of Bilger,25901 Vinedo Lane- Site Development Permit
Reference: Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated February 22, 1995, etc.
Based on referenced Staff Report. on new information submitted to the Planning Commission and on visual
inspection of the height and locations of the new story poles,subject two-story house design has not been
modified to meet conditions previously recommended by the Commission, Specifically:
I, Roof line is still higher than what is permitted by ordinances established by the Town of Los Altos
Hills, The Commission's recommendation to lower the roof line has not been incorporated in the latest
update. The existing pad must be lowered as much as necessary,not just by 4 feet as originally
planned, so that the height will conform to ordinance.
2. The minor"stepping of the facade"has not changed anything as far as we are concerned. Our view is
still blocked. The excessive decking still creates unpleasant visual effects. The proposed `screening by
•
vegetation"between our house and the new construction will not alter the fact that our view will still
be blocked. The proposed vegetation might block the view from our home even more.
3. The Bilger's lot is very similar to all the hilltoplots on the same side on Vinedo Lane. They all `slope
from the road down to a flat pad area and then from the existing pad down to the rear of the lot". (Par.
2 of Page 2,memo from Giuliani and Kull,Inc.Dated 2'6.95). All existing two-story houses on the
same side on Vinedo Lane blend in quite well with the environment and so should the Bilgers' new
house. However,this tall,massive and bulky two-story-with-a-basement-like structure as des_gned is
neither compatible with homes in the area nor will it blend in with the neighborhood. The design just
• does not fit this lot with an average slope of 22%. Plain and obvious,Its height must be lowered and its
visible decking must be reduced in order to make it more neighbor-friendly.
•Again,we are not objecting to the Bilgers building their new home, We are only objecting to the current •
massive and bulky design. We therefore respectfully request the Planning Commission to only approve a
design based on: 1)the mandate of City Zoning and Site Development Ordinance standards; 2)the specific
shape and topography of the lot; and 3)the absence of any negative impact to its neighbors.
Sincerely,:
•
• c /
r /ie
oseN N. Wong
•1
TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS
26379 Fremont Road • Los Altos Hills,California 94022 • (415)941-7222 • FAX (415)941-3160
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WORKSHEET #2 •
EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FLOOR AREA
• TURN IN WITH YOUR APPLICATION •
PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME P.1 , ; --;7-7
PROPERTY ADDRESS .p.50, .- i v 1 -";•-• (--.D
CALCULATED BY f!---.11 ), 1 r.? 1 v 1) I. ! DATE 1 O Q, ..-.-.3 4,
1. DEVELOPMENT AREA (SQUARE FOOTAGE)
Existing Proposed Total
To >wo�tQ (Additions �)
A. House and Garage (from Part B) < 261
B. � _ , _ REDS • -4J,-0-0-6.-------A'01 ��
g
C. Driveway and Parking ��! � ._Cajl 07�—+hQ,(ktui«,oG-�
(Measured 100' along centerline) (51 ,
Zy LI opt,� ,
D. Patios and Walkways I "-( r '
E. s Cert C,1)."2_•;•7::51-17
3C2 1, ,�
50Z 5
F. Pool and Decking ..,c)6.-6 )O1 ' ''O:161-f)
J 1 ^7'y
G. Accessory Buildings (from Part B) I 5 I S
Pour �"3.1P,
H. Arty other coverage
TOTALS 0 . Z') 9 0 Z5 _:,
Maximum Development Area Allowed - MDA (from Worksheet #1) I ) 0 70 I
2. FLOOR AREA (SQUARE FOOTAGE) -
Existing Proposed Total
• tO ee (Additions er.geletian$
A. House and Garage . Rt o J CO
a. 1st Floor <21
,
�2 l i. �'> _)1 Z. ., C?)-11.-9 .7.74?,
b. 2nd Floor 11 Cdi e)63 r
c. Attic and Basement 1�CEA.t Pr — a ---0-0--6::%?
00--6::%?t 3R
B. Accessory Buildings
a. 1st Floor
b. 2nd Floor
c. Attic and Basement
TOTALS </2A,5 9
r
Maximum Floor Area Allowed - MFA (from Worksheet #1) I Lk& �j q I
TOWN USE ONLY I CHECKED BY SU7 -in ne. Davis 1 DATE IQ121\91-1 1
eased 12//91 LDJ: MAC HD/ORIGINALS/PLANNING/Worksheet a2