Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.1 t0 J. ' July 26, 1995 TOWN OF Los ALTOS HILLS Staff Report to the Planning Commission RE: STUDY SESSION REGARDING SUBDIVISIONS AND THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FROM: Curtis Williams, Planning Direc'�Qr� J Several subdivisions, lot line adjustments and lot mergers are tentatively • scheduled to come to the Commission in the coming months, beginning at the August 9th meeting. In some of those cases, either Negative Declarations or an Environmental Impact Report (Vidovich) will accompany those projects, pursuant to provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Given the upcoming projects, staff felt it would be timely to review the basics of subdivision and CEQA law and how they relate to Town development review.. Attached are handouts I will use to present the background material to the Commission. I hope this informal session will be helpful and I'd be glad to provide additional information you need subsequent to the meeting. ATTACHMENT Town of Los Altos Hills Study Session: California Environmental Quality Act and Subdivision Map Act /pcceqasubd.rep • 1. TOW OF LOS ALTOS HILLS PLA NING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION CALIFO NIA ENVIRONMENTAL Q i ALITY ACT (CEQA) AND SUBDIVISION MAP ACT JULY 26, 1995 t ti ' TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS PLANNING REVIEW,RESPONSIBILITIES PLANNING COMMISSION A. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS B. ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS C. SUBDIVISIONS, LOT!LINE ADJUSTMENTS, AND MERGERS D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND REVIEWS E. VARIANCES. AND EXCEPTIONS F. SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMITS G. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA) H. APPEALS OF STAFF/SDC DECISIONS t. S BDIVISION MAP ACT GOVERN ENT CODE SEC. 66410 ET. SEQ. PRIMARY GOAT S. OF THE ACT: A. TO EN •OURAGE ORDERLY COMMUNITY DEVELO MENT BY PROVIDING FOR THE REGULA ION AND CONTROL OF. THE, DESIGN ,AND IMP OVEMENT OF THE SUBDIVISION, WITH PROPE CONSIDERATION OF ITS RELATION TO ADJOINI G AREAS; B. II'O ENS RE THAT THE AREAS WITHIN THE SUBDIVIS ON THAT ARE DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC PURPOSEWILL BE PROPERLY IMPROVED BY THE UBDIVI D ER SO THAT THEY WILL NOT BECOME AN UNDU BURDEN ON THE COMMUNITY; AND C. TO PROTI CT THE PUBLIC AND INDIVIDUAL TRANSFE EES FROM FRAUD AND EXPLOITATION. 4 SUBDIVISION TERMS 1. SUBDIVISION - DIVISION OF.PROPERTY INTO TWO OR MORE LOTS; REQUIRES!TENTATIVE MAP AND FINAL MAP; HEARING. AND FINDINGS BY COMMISSION WITH RECOMMENDATIONTO COUNCIL; COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED; FINAL MAP APPROVED BY COUNCIL, ALONG WITH ACCEPTANCE OF LAND AND EASEMENT DEDICATIONS. 2. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT - ALTERATION OF LOT LINES RESULTING IN NO NEW LOTS BEING CREATED; DOES NOT REQUIRE FILING A MAP OR RECORD OF SURVEY, BUT DOES REQUIRE COMMISSION AND COUNCIL APPROVAL; NO DISCRETIONARY CONDITIONS. 3. MERGER - MERGING TWO OR MORE LOTS INTO ONE PARCEL; TREATED AS SUBDIVISION MAP.:. 4. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - DOCUMENTATION THAT A LOT IS "LEGAL"; COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED; DOES NOT ASSURE THAT BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE GRANTED. 5. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT .- AGREEMENT WITH SUBDIVIDER TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS (ROADS, PATHWAYS, SEWER, LANDSCAPING, ETC.) WITHIN SPECIFIED TIME FRAME; COUNCIL APPROVAL AT TIME OF FINAL MAP; REQUIRES SURETY TO GUARANTEE COMPLETION; NO BUILDING PERMITS UNTIL IMPROVEMENTS ARE COMPLETED. 6. NEXUS - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESTRICTIONS AND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES (PATHWAYS, CONSERVATION EASEMENTS, SCHOOLS, . PARKS, ETC.) AND THE PROPOSED PROJECT; MUST BE "NEXUS" TO IMPOSE REQUIREMENTS; MUST ALSO BE IN REASONABLE PROPORTION TO PROJECT/SITE. ' a TO N OF LOS ALTOS HILLS SUBDIVISION CODE (CHAPTER 9-1) 1. TITLE, PURPOS► S AND OBJECTIVES: 2. DEFINITIONS 3. GENERAL PRO ISIONS 4. PRELEMINARY APS AND CONFERENCES 5. TEN''ATIVE M PS 6. TENTATIVE LO DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS 7. ROAD;DESIGN STANDARDS 8. SOILS REPORT' 9. GEOLOGIC RE ORTS, 10. APPEALS 11. IMPROVEMEN S 12. FINAL MAPS 13. IMPIOVEMEN AGREEMENTS, SECURITY AND INSURANCE 14. PARK AND RE SREATION REQUIREMENTS 15. CONDITIONAL EXCEPTIONS z TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS SUBDIVISION APPROVAL PROCESS PRELIMINARY MAP AND CONFERENCE Subdivision Review Committee (Staff, Pathways; Envir. Design) TENTATIVE MAP Subdivision Review Committee Other Agencies Planning Commission City Council FINAL MAP Planning Director City Engineer City Council IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Planning Director Town Engineer - Town Council CONSTRUCTION OF,IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING PERMITS -a. FINDING. FOR UBDIVISION APPROVAL • SECTIO 9-1.515(E) • CONSIS ENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN • CONSIS ENT WITH ZONING PROVISIONS • CONSIS ENT WITH SITE DEVELOPMENT PROVISI o NS • CONSIST NT WITH SUBDIVISION MAP ACT • SHOULD CONSIDER: (A) E IRONMENTAL REV i EW (CEQA); (B) REC•MMENDATIONS OF TOWN ADVISORY CO MITTEES; (C) OR •INANCES AND GENERAL PLAN; (D) REQ ESTS FOR EXCEPTIONS; (E) STA F REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS; (F) PUB IC TESTIMONY; AND (G) TES IMONY OF SUBDIVIDER AND/OR REP I' ESENTATIVES i • FINDINGS FOR SUBDIVISION DENIAL SECTION 9-1.515(E): 1. THAT THE PROPOSED MAP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE GENERAL PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLANS; 2. THAT THE DESIGN OR IMPROVEMENT OF THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE GENERAL PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLANS; 3. THAT THE SITE IS NOT PHYSICALLY SUITABLE FOR THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT; 4. THAT THE DESIGN OF THE SUBDIVISION OR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARE LIKELY TO CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE OR SUBSTANTIALLY AND AVOIDABLY INJURE FISH OR WILDLIFE OR THEIR HABITAT; 5. THAT THE DESIGN OF THE SUBDIVISION OR THE TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS ARE LIKELY TO CAUSE SERIOUS PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEMS; 6. THAT THE DESIGN OF THE SUBDIVISION OR THE TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS WILL CONFLICT WITH EASEMENTS, ACQUIRED BY THE PUBLIC AT LARGE, FOR ACCESS THROUGH OR USE OF, PROPERTY WITHIN THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION. } • FINDING, FOR CONDITI • NAL EX EPTI• NS • SECTION -1.1501: NO CONDITIO AL EXCEPTION SHALL BE RECOMMENDE 1 FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL UNLESS THE PLANNIN a COMMISSION FINDS THAT: (A) ' HERE AR SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES OR CONDITI•NS AFFECTING SUCH PROPERTY SO THAT THE STRICT APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIO S OF THIS CHAPTER WOULD DEPRIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE REASONABLE USE OF HIS LAND; A D (B) • BY GRANTS NG THE CONDITIONALEXCEPTION (APPLIED F 0 R, ANY OTHER LANDOWNER SHALL • NOT BE D :PRIVED OF THE REASONABLE USE OF HIS.LAND OR BE SUBJECTED TO UNDUE BURDENS •R HARDSHIPS OR BE DEPRIVED OF ANY MAT TRIAL USE OR ENJOYMENT OF HIS PROPERTY /PCceqasubd.tbl L PURPOSESOF. CEOA . ■ ESTABLISH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICIES FOR CALIFORNIA ■ REQUIRE DISCLOSURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES ■ REQUIRE AGENCIES. TO.AVOID OR REDUCE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE WHEN FEASIBLE ▪ FOSTER INTERAGENCY COORDINATION ■ ENHANCE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ■ REQUIRE AGENCY DECISION MAKERS TO EXPLAIN THE REASONS WHY THEY ALLOW ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE TO OCCUR LEGISLATIVE MECHANISMS TO ACCOMPLISH CEQA'S PURPOSES • DISCLO URE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Eli s Negative Declarations Initial Studies • AVOIDANCE OR REDUCTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Mitigation Measures Alternatives Findings on Mitigation Measures and Alternatives ■ INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION Early Consultation Scoping Notice of Preparation St71 to Clearinghouse Review • PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Public Notice and Review R sponse to. Comments Citizen Enforcement m ent ■ ACCOUNTABILITY IN DECISION MAKING Findings Statements of Overriding Corsideration Reporting and Monitoring • LEAD AGENCY HAS PRINCIPAL RESPONSIBILITY TO CARRY OUT CEQA • Principal responsiblity to: - prepare initial study - decide "threshold question" - prepare Negative Declaration or EIR CEQA APPLIES TO DISCRETIONARY PROJECT APPROVALS • Discretionary versus ministerial - Discretionary:-exercise-of-judgment-or deliberation. - Ministerial: conformity with statutes, regulations, standards • Public agency funding of private project • Public agency approvals (permits, leases, and other entitlements) • Government initiated actions PRELIMINARY REVIEW UNDER CEQA IS THE APPLICATION COMPLETE? (PRIVATE PROJECTS ONLY) 111 IS THE ACTIVITY A "PROJECT"? DOES A STATUTORYEXEMPTI9NrAPPLYT- • - DOES A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION APPLY? ii 3 I • • TYPE.'. OF PROJ ; CTS INFRAST" UCTURE AND UBLIC FACILI IES LANS, PROGRAMS, AND POLICIES • 0 'PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 24 , . AGENCY DECISION 'MAKING UNDER CEQA ■ CERTIFICATION Certification of adequacy of EIR Certification that decision makers have reviewed and considered EIR ■ FINDINGS FOR SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS AND ALTERNATIVES ■ Three possible conclusions - Impact mitigated by lead agency - Impact mitigated by another agency - Mitigation of impact infeasible ▪ Evidence in record to support conclusions ▪ Explanation: the analytical bridge between evidence and conclusion ■ REPORTING OR MONITORING PROGRAM ■ STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION ■ NOTICE OF DETERMINATION • DECISION BY RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES s. (:7: - PUBLI . NOTICE AND REVIEW UNDER CEQA ■ NOTICE 0 PEOPLE WHO REQUEST IT 11 PUBLIC OTICE - THREE OPTIONS - Publi' ation in general circulation newspaper - Posti g property - Maili g to adjacent landowners and renters ■ PUBLIC EARINGS ■ STATE C EARINGHOUSE REVIEW - State Lead Agency Involvement - NEP • Documents - State Responsible, or Trustee Agency Inv Ivement - Projel ts of Statewide, Regional, or Areawide Signi icance - Proje ts in Designated Sensitive Areas OiruiIU1101% Y ziNki:ivdd lyart,•u I o (PRC 210S0 (b1JI11) if o Ministerial projects (PRC 21080 11)1111) , .r o Emergencies (PP.0 21080 Ib)i21,I31,I41) o Disapprovals of projects (PRC 210S0 [b1[5]) o Early activities related to poWer plants (PRC 21080 [b1161) o Setting of rates, tolls, fares, or other charges (PRC 21080 (b][8J) o Actions taken to implement Proposition 13 (PRC 21080 (1)1(91) inisting rail lines, highways, or rights-of-way (PRC 21050(bl(111-(1)1[15)) o Transit projects ex PRC 21080(1))[)x1) o Adoption of regional or state transportation improvement progress outside California subject to NEPA or another 'little NEPA' (PRC 210S0[bl(151) o Projects � (PRO 21080[1)](16]) o Local agency rules to implement a state-certified regulatory program o Specific prisons (PRC 21050.01-21080.07) o Feasibility or planning studies (PRC 21102; 21150) - —_ - - o Local government approval-of LCPs (PRO 210S6.9)' o 0-PR general plan time extensions (PRC 21080.10[31) ancial assistance for low- and moderate-income. housing (PRC 21050.10[b1) o HCD finPRO 21050.11) o State Lands Commission title and boundary settlements o Railroad grade separations (PRC 21080.13) . o Senior housing or second unit ordinances (PRC 21080.17) o K-12 school closings (PRO 21080.18) , o Street or highway restripiag (PRO 21050.19) Pipelines of less than 1 mile in public rights-of-way (PRO 221080 21) o Pi p q Water Code 13372 and 133S9) o SWRCB waste discharge re uircments under Clean Water Act o Adoption of timber preserve zones (Government Code 51119) o Local shad: control ordinances (PRC 25985) • o Daycare homes with seven to 12 children (Health and Safety Code 1597.461bl) NONPROJECTS 1 o Proposals for legislation (CCR 1537S Ib1121) o Administrative or maintenance activities (CCR 15373 1b1(31) o initiativesd (CCR 1537S (b1l 1) 6 1 I it CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS i iI l a Class 1: Modifications to existing faciliti s (14 CCR 15301) •• ;� iClass 2. Replacement or reconstruction of existing facilities (14 CCR 15302) i Class 3: New construction or conversio of small structures (14 CCR 15303) i Class 4: Minor alterations to land (14 ',Cr 15304) Class 5: Minor alterations in land use li. itations (14 CCR 15305) Class 6: Information collection (14 CC' 15306) Class 7: Actions by regulatory agencies for protection of natural resouI iccs (14 CCR 15307) ! Class 8: Actions by regulatory agencies for protection of the environment (14 CCR 1530S) Ci '.s.9: lnspecti.:ns (14 CCR 15309) Class 10: Veteran loans 14 CCR 15310 Class 11: Accessory structures (14 CCR 15311) . Class 12: Surplus government property ales (14 CCR 15312) Class 13: Land acquisition for wildlife c•nservation purposes (14 CCR 15313) Class 14: Minor additions to schools (1• CCR 15314) Cass 15: 1\/..nor land division (14 CCR 15315) Class 16: Transfer of ownership of land to create parks (14 CCR 15316) Class 17: Open space contracts or ease ents (14 CCR 15317) Class 18: Designation of wilderness areas (14 CCR 15318) I Class 19: Annexations of existing facilit es and lots for exempt facilities (14 CCR 15319) Class 20: Changes in local agency orga izations (14 CCR 15320) Class 21: Enforcement actions by regu atory agencies (14 CCR 15321) Class 22: Educational or training pro ams (14 CCR 15322) i Class 23: Normal operation= of faciliti s for public gatherings (14 CCR 15323) Class 24: Regulation of working condi ions (14 CCR 15324) Class 25: Transfers of ownership of in crest in land to preserve open space (14 CCR 15325) Class 26: Acquisition of housing for h using assistance programs (14 CCR 15326) Class 27: Leasing new facilities (14,CCR 15327) ! Class 2S: Small hydroelectric projects at existing facilities (14 CCR 15323) Class 29: Cogeneration projects at cxi•ting faciliti-:s (14 CCR 15329)1 . INITIAL STUDIES USES ▪ DECIDING TO PREPARE ER/NEGATIVE DECLARATION ■ AVOIDING EIRs ■ FOCUSING ON POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ■ IDENTIFYING AND JUSTIFYING LESS-THAN- -- SIGNIFICANT - SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ■ FACILITATING EARLY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ■ SUPPORTING NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS ■ ELIMINATING UNNECESSARY EIRs ■ FOSTERING REUSE OF EIRs CONTENTS ■ DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ■ IDENTIFICATION OF SETTING ■ IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS ■ MITIGATION MEASURES ■ CONSISTENCY WITH PLANS AND POLICIES ■ NAME OF PREPARER WARNING ■ BEWARE OF THE "NAKED" CHECKLIST -4 APPENDIX I ai IRJNMENTAL FISP FORM (Ti Be Completed By Lead Agency) C I. Backgro 1. Nam of.Propone t 2. .AddhJess and Pho e Number of Proponent 3. Dat of Checkli-t Submitted 4. Agency Requirin: Checklist. 5. Name of Proposa , if applicable 1 Ii. Environmental Impact- (Explana ions of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable ea.gth conditions or in changes in geologic su.structures? b. Disruptions displacements, compaction or overcoverin• of the soil? _ c. Change in t.pography or ground surface relief feat i res? d. The destruc ion, covering or modification of any uniq'e geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? _ f. Changes .in 6 eposition or erosion of beach sands, or ci :nges in siltation, deposition or erosion whl'h may modify the channel of a river or st - or the bed of the ocean or . any bay, in et or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazardssucl as earthquakes, landsllides, mudslides, ::round failure, or similar hazards? ,_ r 19$ --- MAKING CEQA: THRESHOLD DECISIONS• ▪ LEGAL STANpARDS: - CAN IT BE "FAIRLY ARGUED" • - BASED ON - SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT MAY OCCUR? • TOOLS T9 HELP AGENCIES - INITIAL STUDY R SULTS - MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE - CEA GUIDELINES - APPENDIX - CONSULTATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES - ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CHANGES - DISAGREEMENT AMONG EXPERTS - PUBLIC CONTROVERSY - VIOLATIONS OF AIR AND WATER STANDARDS. -• ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES (APPENDIX K) NEGATIVE DECL LiAtivhi 4 + REVIEW PROCESS INITIAL STUDY CONDUCTED MITIGATION MEASURES IDENTIFIED AND AGREED TO BY PROPONENT DRAFT N EGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED PUBLIC NOTICE AND REVIEW - - • 21 days if local= review - • - 30 days if State Clearinghouse review O NEGATIVE DECLARATION RESPONSES TO O . REC LVED AND CONSIDERED - NEGATIVE DECLARATION COMPLETED • (105 .AYS) • N EGA t iV E DECLARATION ADOPTED • LEAD GENCY PROJECT DECISION (180 DAYS) REPORTING OR MONITORING PROGRAM ADOPTED ti NOTICE OF DETERvIINATION FILED AND POSTED RESPONSIBLE AGENCY ACTION i • - • is i' 4 • REQUIRED CONTENTS OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION n PROJECT DESCR(PT1ON 21 PROJECT LOCATION • 13 MITIGATION MEASURES CONCLUSION THAT PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS • Q COPY OF INITIAL; STUDY- 16 . . . , . EIR. REVIEW PROCESS NOTICE OF PREPARATION MAILED (30 DAYS) DRAF— E1R .PREPARED PUBLIC NOTICE AND REVIEW - 30 days if local review - 45 days if State Clearinghouse review NOTI E OF COMPLETION - FINAL EIR LEAD AGENCY PROJECT DECISION (1 YEAR) FINDI GS/STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS WRITTEN AND ADOPTED REPORTING OR.MONITORING PROGRAM ADOPTED NOTICE OF DETERMINATION FILED AND POSTED (5 DAYS) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY ACTION (6 MONTHS) 19 • 4 . BARE THE EIR WHO MAY PREPARE OPTIONS 11 LEAD AGENCY STAFF PREPARES is LEAD AGENCY HIRES CONSULTANT - BEARS COST rl LEAD AGENCY HIRES CONSULTANT - APPLICANT PAYS ® LE AD AGENCY SELECTS CONSULTANT - APPLICANT HIRES AND PAYS APPLICANT SELECTS CONSULTANT - AGENCY HIRES - APPLICANT PAYS APPLICANT SELECTS ,' HIRES, AND PAYS CONSULTANT BUT, REMEMBER: LEAD AGENCY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SCOPE, CONTENT, AND ADEQUACY DET : MINING SCOPE OF EIR • ■ INITIAL ST DIES ■ NOTICE O ' PREPARATION OF RESPONSES o CONSULTATION WITH AGENCIES = r: ■ SCOPING EETINGS 4 REQUIRED CONTENTS OF AN EIR • TABLE OF CONTENTS OR INDEX • SUMMARY ▪ PROJECT DESCRIPTION • ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING • SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS - Direct - Indirect - Cumulative - Growth Inducing - Unavoidable • ALTERNATIVES • MITIGATION MEASURE 11 SHORT-TERM USES VS LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY* • IRREVERSIBLE CHANGES* *Required only in EIRs on plans, policies ordinances, LAFCO actions, and joint NEPA documents. • EIR ADEQUACY: LECAL STANDARDS • ALL REQUIRED CONTENTS MUST BE INCLUDED ▪ OBJECTIVE, GOOD FAITH-EFFORT AT FULL DISCLIDSURE I PERFECTION OT REQUIRED ;•' EXHAUSTIVE REATMENT OF ISSUES NOT REQUI " ED • ▪ MINO!t TECH ICAL DEFECTS NOT NECESSARI Y FATAL ▪ DISAREEME T AMONG EXPERTS ACCEPTABLE CONTENTS OF FINAL EIR o DRAFT. EIR si COP IES OF COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING PUBLIC REVIEW LIST OF PERSONS AND ENTITIES COMMENTING aRESP ONSES TO .COMMENTS _._ -. - ... • - MUST CONTAIN A GOOD-FAITH , WELL-REASONED E D WRITTEN ANSWER • • x 3 1 44 4. . MITIGATION MONITORING : PROVISIONS OF AB 3180 ■ APPLIES TO: Adoption of Negative Declarations Findings after EIR ■ REQUI " ES: Adoption of a reporting or monitoring program for changes in the pro'ect adopted or made conditions of approval to mitigate or avoid significant effects to . ensure compliance during project implementation ■ AUTHORIZES: Levying fees to pay for program ■ PROVIDES: That agencies with jurisdiction by law over natural resources may be required to prepare monitoring programs if their recommended mitigation measures are adopted by the lead agency ' i .. .. • iu r•B . .. : :•: :::: : SimplifiedCEQAFlowc art :::: . . <...; :. •• • Initial ProjectReview No( temmCE OA, Exempt from CE0A, project may have significant :.. :.:: • no further review. environmental effects Prepare an 'Initial Study' • . No significant effects Significant effects . or all effects mitigated possible • • Negative Declaration Draft EIR written written Public Review Period Public Review Period • Note: _ >: :>: Final EIR completed ""This Chart illustrates . ..•::. the three common . paths for project • •• processing. Process- Consideration &Approval Consideration & Certification jn times and.the level of ND by decisionmakers of FEIR by decisionmakers g . of complexity of: : Negative.Declarations and EIRs are not the . p... Project Decision made same::: :::?:`: :.:::>..:` i