The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About4.6 TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS August 9,;1995 Staff Report to the Planning Commission RE: NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR FOUR LOT SUBDIVISION,LANDS OF LE FEVRE; SOUTH SIDE OF ALTAMONT ROAD,EAST OF JULIETTA LANE. FROM: Suzanne Davis,Planner SP_J - APPROVED BY: Curtis S.Williams,Planning Direc* RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission: 1. Review and make comments on the Negative.Declaration and proposed Tentative Tract Map. 2. Continue the application to September 13, 1995, to allow the applicant to revise plans as directed and to allow staff to prepare findings and . conditions of approval, address issues, and make: any .necessary corrections to the Negative Declaration. REQUIRED DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS The following describes the Town's discretionary actionswhich are required for approval of the subdivision: 1. Adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration by the City Council. 2. Approval of the Mitigation Monitori g Program by the City Council. 3. Approval of the Tentative Subdivisioi Map by the City Council. 4. Abandonment a portion of the existing conservation easement, which requires approval by the City Council. The Planning Commission's action relative to the=Negative Declaration. and Tentative Map are recommendations totheCity Council. TENTATIVE MAP REVIEW In order to approve a subdivision,the Planning Commission must determine that the project is consistent with the General Plan and subdivision and zoning regulations, and that none of the findings for denial can be made, as specified in Section 66474 of the State Subdivision Map Act. If the Commission can makeany of the findings listed in Attachment 1, the subdivision must either be redesigned or denied. Comments on the tentative map have been received from the Town x Planning Commission r Lands of LeFevre August 9, 1995 Page 2 •. . Geologist,Pathways Committee and Los Altos Fire Department,and are attached for the Commission's review (see Attachments 3-5)J Neighboring residents and property owners within 500 feetofthe site have been.notified of this hearing. After this hearing,staff will address any concerns of the Planning Commission and public and will return at a meeting on or after September 13, 1995, as directed by the Planning Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and draft Mitigation MonitoringProgram have been prepared for the project by environmental consultant J lie M. Blakeslee. The.review period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment 2) for the proposed four lot subdivision ended July 26, 1995. The Illanning Commission may make comments on both the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Tentative Map. The Nl egative Declaration must be approved i order to approve the tentative map. In order to recommend approval of�the document, the.Commission.nees to find that there are no significant environmental effects which are:not addressed through the proposed mitigation measures. Recommended mitigation measures primarily deal with drainage and grading controls, protection and/or replacement of oak trees, and designation of conservation,easements. If the Commission determines that substantive changes to the Negative Declaration are needed, the document will need to be recirculated for another 21 day public review periodJ BACKGROUND The subjectil• roperty was formerly owned by the Eshner family, and was part of a 33 acre estate called Silent. Hills Ranch. In. 1970 the Town approved a subdivision which divided the Eshner property into 14 lots (Tract 4897, which was recorde in 1971). The Eshner home site was reduced to two acres, and was surrounded y a donut shaped parcel just under.15 iacres in size. In 1989, the 15 acre parcel (lot 14) and the two acre Eshner home site were subdivided into three lots-and .a. 9.45 acre remainder.parcel (Parcel..Map..625-M-4/6, which.,was recorded in 1990). That remainder parcel is the:site of the proposed four lot subdivision. The former Eshner home is now the Lands of Cleary, and is 2.43 acres. The applicant owns the 9.45 acre site and the two lots to the south(2.6 and 1.5 acres). The 1989 Julie Eshner subdivision approval included a number of improvements which were required to be done. To date a number of the-improvements have not been completed including the construction of Silent Hills Lane,and provision of water and sewer service. t Planning Commission Lands of LeFevre August 9, 1995 Page 3 There have been several previous proposals to subdivide the 9.45.acre remainder parcel; the most recent was a five lot subdivision..which..was forwarded'to the City Council with a recommendation for denial by.the Planning Commission in 1992. The Commission had concerns about proposed changes to the existing conservation easement,the number of lots being proposed, the access to the,lots, and the configuration of some of the parcels, particularly a flag lot. There was also considerable discussion onthe pathway requirements. The City Council held one hearing on the subdivision on September 16, 1992, continued it to October 9, 1992, and then to November 4, 1992. The applicant eventually - dropped the application. The City Coutcil had:concerns about the realignment of the conservation easement and multiple access points to the subdivision from Altamont Road.. The Councilalso stated that the subdivision:should be reduced from five to four lots. There are two historic brick pillars marking the driveway entrance to the property. One has a metal placard with the name "Eshner" and "26410 Altamont Road" on it, and the other has a nameplate for "Silent Hills Ranch." The pillars and entry gate may be relocated by the Clearys when the new road is put in. DISCUSSION Project Location and Setting The'project site is located within the Town Limits of Los Altos Hills in Santa Clara County. The site is comprised of a horseshoe-shaped parcel consisting of 9.45 gross acres. The parcel fronts on the Altamont Road on the northerly side, and is surrounded by residential zoning on the remaining sides. The project site is located just north of the intersection of Altamont Court and Altamont Road. There is an abandoned cottage on the property, and the remainder of the site is a walnut orchard. There is a trace of the Berrocal fault on the property and a 60 foot wide human habitation setback is shown on the tentative map. The project site is bounded to thewest by properties developedwith single family residences, one fronting on Altamont Road and four fronting on Julietta - Lane; to the'south by two'undeveloped parcels owned by the applicant; to the east by'a 12.92 acre parcel,and to the north by properties developed with single family residences. The project site and the two parcels to the south surround a 2.43 acre parcel" with' an existing single family'.residence (Lands of Cleary). Access to=the site is provided by an existing driveway-off Altamont Road,-which also leads to the Cleary property.P P t3'. _ Project Description The applicant proposes'to subdivide the 9.45-acre parcel into four smaller parcels ranging in size from 1.21 to 3.83 net acres. All four-lots would be servedby a Planning Commission Lands of LeFevre August 9, 1945 Page 4 new public roadway (Eli abeth Court) which will enter off Altamont Road. Private driveways woul extend off Elizabeth Court to.the four lots. The driveway to the Cleary pr perty is to be changed to access from Silent Hills Lane (see additional discussion n this issue below). The proposed right of way width for'Elizabeth Court is sho n to be 60 feet, ending in a 60 foot radius cul-de-sac bulb. The name Elizab-th was suggested by Town Historian Rosemary Meyerott, as it is historic.11y significant being the former name for Altamont Road. The following table inclu•es an analysis of each lot and its corresponding Lot Unit Factor (LUF), Maxim Development Area (MDA) and Maximum Floor Area (MFA) las required b1 Sections 10-1.502 and 10-1.5031of the Town of Los Altos Hills Zoning Ordin.nce. The average slope for the entire site is 14.6%. Step-on-contour or Type I foundations will be required for lots 1 and 2 due to the slope. TABLE 1 Lot# Net Acr:s Ave. Slope LUF MDA MFA 1 1.30 19.5% 1.04 11,895 5,746 2 2.55 19.4% 2.04 23,409 11,281 3 1.21 5.4% 1.21 18,150 7,260 4 3.83 11.7% 3.69 52,998 21,826 Source: Giuliani&Kull,Inc. Staff has identified the following issues which are critical to the evaluation of this subdivision. The Planninv Commission should discuss each issue and provide direction for the applicant.•nd staff. . . Dr' - . . .n. A - • h: .r Pr. •-r Access to the Cleary prop-rty is presently taken from- a private driveway off Altamont Road. When th:. four-lot parcel map (EshnI er, 1990) was approved, a .-_.private street called Silent 'lls Lane was-to be constructed off,Altamont Court. The Cleary p operty (parce 3) was to gain access from this road as were,the two LeFevre properties (parcel. 1 and,2). However, the road and other remaining subdivision improvements have not been completed, and the existing Altamont driveway access to the Cle.ry site has remained and is still in use. Although the applicant and the Clearys ave been in recent negotiation about the relocation of the driveway an existing • iet title action between the two parties has not been settled. A tentative agreement ent was signed by both Mr. LeFevre and Dr. Cleary last October (see Attachment 6). According to the agreement Mr. LeFevre will be Planning Commission Lands of LeFevre August 9, 1995 Page 5 responsible for the completion of Silent Hills Lane, and,Dr. Cleary will be responsible for the new driveway as it enters his property. A condition of approval of the proposed subdivision should be the requirement tocomplete any subdivision improvements for.parcel•map 625-M-416 which affect the continuity of access and utility services to the Cleary property;,induding.the construction of Silent.Hills Lane. Location of Elizabeth Court Intersection and Cul-de-sac The section of Altamont Road along the site has a number of curves and hills. Due to lack of visibility there is a question .about-safety for vehicles heading north on Altamont Road making a left turn onto Elizabeth Court and for cars exiting Elizabeth Court. The proposed road will intersect Altamont Road approximately 35 feet closer to the northwest corner of the property than the existing, driveway. The sight distance required for- vehicles traveling on Altamont Road to have clear view of a vehide exiting or slowing down to enter Elizabeth Court would be improved with the road in the proposed location. The Negative Declaration notes that the street intersection:is in the location recommended.by the traffic consultant (TJKM) for the 1992 subdivision application. The proposed right-of-way almost abuts the southerly property line of the Cleary property. If the right-of-way is pulled back fromthe common property line, there would be more space to plant landscaping so that there is a better buffer between the Cleary property and the ne' v street. Building Sites The proposed building areas on lots 3 and 4 appear to be in reasonable locations. The proposed building site on lot 1,:however, has the.potential to impact a number of trees.,.Although it is in a level area,the proposed building site,for lot 2 is in a poor location given the proximity of the Cleary residence. An alternative location for a building site is the southwesterly portion of the lot, between the water tank and the sanitary sewer easement: ,While there is more slope in this location, there are no trees which would be impacted, and a new house would not be directly in front of the Cleary residence. However, the adjacent residents on Julietta Lane (Spohr:and Stanley) may be concerned about a shift of the building site towards their properties. A combination of,lots, 1 and 2 would allow a building site providing greater separation from the existing residence and protection of the existing trees. The Commission should also.,discuss whether setback, height, or other development restrictions should be placed on any of the lots. 7 Planning Commission Y Lands of LeFevre - . August 9, 1995 Page 6 Conservation Easements At the time of the original subdivision which"was recorded in 1971, a 1.939 acre conservatioi easement w.s created for preservation of view and slope control purposes, although the d-dication was notaccepted at the time. The owners certificate on the recorde• map states that the conservation easement shall be "kept free and clear of bui dings and structures of any kind." Over the past five years there have been n erous discussions on the possibility of.abandoning.the easement and the grant'ng of a conservation easement with a different - _ __ configuration. A request t o rescind the conservation easement was denied by the City Council in 1991, and a resolution was adopted accepting the easement for public purposes (see Atta ent 7). The existing conservatio easement is proposed t9 be realigned to include a portion of the present ease ent,with additional land area added elsewhere in an amount equivalent to w i at is proposed to be removed. The conservation easement wads established for preservation of the view and slope and serves to benefit the public in several ways: • It provides a visual co r ridor for the Cleary (formerly Eshner) home and the existing lots of the Julie Eshner subdivision. • It provides a similar 'iew corridor for the residents of Julietta Lane, the properties created by T act 4897(Jules &Margaret Eshner subdivision). • • It provides benefit to he public-at-large by retaining the existing natural rolling hills (presently planted with orchard trees) and serves as a buffer. along Alt mont Road. In order to aandon the c 0 nervation easement, the Planning Commission and - City Council will need to ake findings that it is no longer needed by the public. With the a plicant's pr o posed lot configuration, the realignment of the conservation easement w.uld continue to preserve a large`land area while not splitting thesable land in two pieces. Should the easement be abandoned and a new easement granted, t e. conditions of approval may include provisions to limit development in the a ea to be removed from conservation easement status, to ensure that the neighbor ng properties still have a view corridor. For example, development could be l'mited to recreational or outdoor uses such as a ; . swimming pool,decking, atios,etc.,with no structures allowed,or the height of structures could be limited A second conservation ea ement is shown over a portion of lots 1 and 2 where the slope exceeds 30%. The Commission should discuss whether this conservation easement sh uld be larger to include some of the heritage oaks in the vicinity. An alternativ would be to specify with a condition of approval that z Planning Commission Lands of LeFevre August 9, 1995 Page 7 the oak trees shall be protected,.andthat none of the oaks may be removed without permission of the Town. Staffrecommends that no structures of any type be allowed in the conservation. easements being created as part of-the subdivision. Staff alsorecommends that landscaping within the easements be limited to native,non-invasive species, and the removal, of poison oak, or dead or diseased trees as recommended:by a certified arborist,be:allowed.. Trees There are numerous treeson the property.including Coast Live Oak,Valley Oak, Pepper, Sycamore, Eucalyptus, and:Black Walnut. There are also many orchard walnut trees. Staff visited the site and observed some trees on lot 1 whichare not shown accurately on the tentative map. Which trees are proposed for removal and which _are ,intended to.remain should be_,clarified, and may require modification of. the map. or the Negative . Declaration, or both: .. The Environmental Design & Protection Committee'has been asked to review the proposed subdivision, and will present recommendations at the Commission meeting. Utilities Sanitary sewer service will be provided for the four lots. There is an existing sewer easement from Altamont Road through the LeFevre and Cleary properties. Portions of this easement are proposed to be abandoned.and relocated on . - proposed lots 2 and 4. The installation of,subdivision improvements should not unreasonably interfere with the utility service to the Cleary property. The agreement between Dr. Cleary and Mr. LeFevre includes a provision that Mr. LeFevre shall be responsible for the relocation.of any utilities as necessary. Conditions of approval should assure .continuity..of services to ,the Cleary property, Purissima Hills Water Company and ,PG&E. have reviewed the.:proposed subdivision and have stated that utility service can be provided. PG&E has requested.an additional 10 foot wide public utility easement through lot 2 (from the right-of-way to the Cleary.property). Remainder Parcels Potential for future subdivision is possible for the two larger parcels,lots 2 and 4. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 9.1.506(36) of the Subdivision Ordinance, the applicant should either show potential lot splits or preclude future subdivision of any of the lots by recorded restriction. Planning Commission t Lands of LeFevre - August 9, 1995 Page 8 Comments from Other Agencies and Committees The Town Geologist has reviewed the geotechnical reports and plans for the proposed subdivision 'and has visited the property. There is a" 60 foot wide human habitation setback line (HHSBL) over a potentially active trace of the Berrocal fault. The HHSBL is 30 feet on either side of the mapped surface trace of the fault as r commended by the project geotechnical consultant. The HHSBL will place some development limitations on lot 3 as no structures will be allowed within the defined area. The Town Geologist has recommended that the -- geotechnical consultant review the current map and evaluate whether the depicted seismic setback is accurately located and appropriate at this site based on new seismic data. Site development plans for the individual lots will be - - reviewed and approved by the Town Geologist prior to issuance of any building permits for grading or construction. - The Pathway Committee has recommended that'a type IIB path be installed along Altamo t Road, on one side of Elizabeth Court and along the southern boundary of lot 2 from Silent Hills Lane to the path leading to Julietta Lane. The Committee is also requesting a native path along the southwestern edge of lot 4 (see Attachment 4). Los Altos Firg Department has reviewed this proposed subdivision and has recommended approval with the condition that a fire hydrant be installed in a location to bg approved by the Fire Department (see Attachment 5). The proposed street name,Elizabeth Court,is acceptable to the Fire Department. The Santa Clara Bounty Water District commented that the subdivision will not directly affect any of the District's facilities. CONCLUSIONS The Planning Commission should address all of the above issues and direct the applicant and staff regarding appropriate revisior s to the map and/or the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Once the applicant has resubmitted, staff will prepare detailed conditions of approval and findings for a subsequent Planning Commission meeting. Staff is availaple to answer any questions that the Planning Commission or public may have. Planning Commission Lands of LeFevre August 9, 1995 Page 9 ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings for Subdivision Denial 2. Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration, including Slope Density Calculations 3. Report from William Cotton&Associates,dated September 21,1994 4. Pathways,Parks&Recreation Committee recommendation (one page) 5. Letter from City of Los Altos Fire Department(one page) 6. Tentative Access Agreement between LeFevre &Cleary 7. City Council Resolution Accepting Conservation Easement 8. Letter from Dr. &Mrs. Gary Cleary,received August 3, 1995 (two pages) 9. Tentative Map cc: Tom LeFevre 14850 Manuella Road Los Altos Hills,CA 94022 Susan Roberts Giuliani&Kull 20431 Stevens Creek Boulevard,Suite 230 Cupertino,CA 95014 Gary Cleary&Nobuko Saito Cleary 26410 Altamont Road Los Altos Hills,CA 94022 d FINDINGS FOR SUBDIVISION DENIAL SECTION 9-1.515(E): 1. THAT THE PROPOSED MAP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE GENERAL PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLANS; 2. THAT THE DESIGN OR IMPROVEMENT OF THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICABLE GENERAL PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLANS; 3. THAT THE SITE IS NOT PHYSICALLY SUITABLE FOR THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT; 4. THAT THE DESIGN OF THE SUBDIVISION OR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARE LIKELY TO CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE OR SUBSTANTIALLY AND AVOIDABLY INJURE FISH OR WILDLIFE OR THEIR HABITAT; 5. THAT THE DESIGN OF THE SUBDIVISION OR THE TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS ARE LIKELY TO CAUSE SERIOUS PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEMS; 6. THAT THE DESIGN OF THE SUBDIVISION OR THE TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS WILL CONFLICT WITH EASEMENTS, ACQUIRED BY THE PUBLIC AT LARGE, FOR ACCESS THROUGH OR USE OF, • PROPERTY WITHIN THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION. 4. s LeFevre Subdivision Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration May 1995 Town of Los Altos Hills 26379 Fremont Road Los Altos Hills, California 94022 (415) 941-7222 1 able of Contents Section 1 Project Descriptio Section 2 Initiak Study and 1 hecklist Appendix MDA/MFA Work.heets i • • • • ..••••,•'.,.i , ' • 1 ,•....,•,'..•.-•,...-', :".".;!".,•••.:',,-.•. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 5ectlo• n 1 • • • Project Descriptio ' . > I Project Description Project Location The project site is located within the Town Limits of Los Altos Hills in Santa Clara County. The site is comprised of a horseshoe-shaped parcel consisting of 9.45 gross acres. Approximately two-thirds of the parcel lies adjacent to Altamont Road. The project site lies between the intersections of Altamont Road. and Taaffe Road/Byrne Park Lane and Altamont Road and Altamont Lane. The project site is bounded to the west and north by Subdivision Tract No. 4897 and Subdivision Tract No. 4215 to the north, to the east by PM 641 M 16 and 7, and to the south by PM 625 M 4-6. A single-family residence is located on a separate parcel in the center of the horseshoe- shaped project site. The residence is served by ajpaved driveway extending along theproposed private street. The proposed tentative subdivision map indicates that this parcel would be accessed in the future by Silent Hills Lane. The site consists of primarily rolling hills with an average slope of approximately 14.6 percent. The current on-site vegetation is composed of high grasses along with clusters of oak trees, an orchard, and other fruit trees interspersed throughout the site. Project Characteristics The proposed project as defined by the proponent in the Tentative Map application filed on June 2, 1994, is to subdivide the 9.45 acre parcel into;four smaller parcels ranging in size from 1.21 to 3.83 gross acresfor the purpose of constructing single-family residences. Refer to Figure 1. All four lots of the proposed subdivision would be served by a private roadway (Elizabeth Court) which enters from Altamont Road. A conservation easement currently exists on the eastern portion of the project site. The proponent has requested that this easement be relocated and established further to the south. I For the purpose of environmental analysis, additional figures have been provided: Figure 2 - Conceptual Development Plan; Figure 3 - Slope Analysis Map; and Figure 4 - Local Vicinity/Aerial Photo. As shown in Figure 2, an existing cottage is proposed to be removed. The following table includes an analysis of each lot and its corresponding Lot Unit Factor (LUF), Maximum Development Area (MDA) and Maximum Floor Area (MFA) as required by Sections 10-1.502 and 10-1.503 of the Town of Los Altos Hills Zoning Ordinance. Lot # Net Acres Ave. Slope I LUF MDA MFA 1 1.30 19.5 1.04 11,895 5,746 • . 2 2.55 19.4 2.04 23,409 11,281 3 1.21 5.4 1.21 18,150 7,260 4 3.83 11.7 3.69 52,998 21,826 1' t Lot numbers 2 and 4 could pote tially be subdivided in the future because they are at least twice as large as the one ac e minimum zoning for the site. Existing easements on these lots may limit the ability t. subdivide. Project Contact Persons Town of Los Altos Hills - Lead Ag-ncy Debbie Pollart, Interim Town Planner and Suzanne Davis, Assistant Planner 26379 Fremont Road Los Altos Hills, California 94022 (415) 941-7222 Project Proponent Tom LeFevre Proponent Consultant Bill Kull Giuliani & Kull, Inc. 20431 Stevens Creek Boulevard Suite 230 Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 257-6446 Proposed Finding The proposed project is not antici ated to have a significant effect on the environment after implementation of the mitigation easures proposed. Issues of the project were identified in an Initial Study completed and included in this document. ] The issues include land use, hydrology and biological resources. Refer to the Initial Study and attached narrative. 2 I .1.1:75 fi _ IF Ale-is-L.6 /d.-•AS•.T� [Aeo545-r/r2F 'F 2 J - 4.4.Wof scar* k. 0\ ,p e ... .. .„ .. • . .,,,:; --'--:7-------1---- ,. ALY.i..kiu1 xALE :p.4a' .P!.e,7�.-• •4C S : '._SITE `a��. •.. __,.-trr.t?{ fir.-� „jam•\`\, .,x\,> • y t^.e / r3 •� Baa°"' t •)��c/ . 4u4�s .•, vs-�s.� a J (( •'N•{ • E L� •� hPatS ` -:,:i.,'",,,.',\sk \ 11 '•. \ • ,\ 3r. ..y`` Tel Y •,y✓ Aa.mcwl LAw{ IC:1) dt GS.. ,•... w.. \•�,A'''t \ ✓ "..""" <•T].k,` .,•; • \ ''...,..,,,../••• ..L C L . `�/ "'/ ..y.e 112j t;Y 8ECTION•A-A' r 9 P 430 c1" \bf • ,,y{cY r.I• I • �0�• 1•Vo3. \''.• {•. \ 1 1 t / ., ;3• /l' \\ ��AA'a '�'�" , • LOT 3 ( 1 Lay. \ \\es`� \� VICINITY HAP -. •� c L. \• L21 ACRES. I ) I /,j� \ \ t• \ ,... ..c.:.,.. u.a ,n. ... ▪ it.•ur w• I / '\(It \ I V// • \{ ° J 7.,..r' ::.\4- _ (• J+\ LOT 4 l 1 / �\.il \ t• \`- 1 i:▪ `S I. � \ 1\ I y,,, / 3.8P AC. I 1 \i, t� OWwcn/ _.----Tor Lvcv9c N i • t.r.• • I .• .•a. • , I.83�AC. EXCLUbING •\\ \, , oweLarta LOS /03 MILLS.ee 14021 •MAO :•` \ /�\ CON ERVATION E•S EHTj\ • 1\ �,' r \ o • e t ax LOT I �'_•- ` A:7.... \• C • ` / \ \ \ '•(a anmrual— •ueu 1• u.ue _ p ` / C' ao•, ' •- \L 0 ACRiS.w�.e•�I1 �AT % T a .w ola �� _ �` -t'7 fO �\ T I406I 217-11••••lOta A,'sCl o t • • _ 1 •.d.t 1 G Nw )sr6i4 F\ \ \ :� �-L �� Y� ANSA (GADse).-—......-3.4[x:/e. L` 1 1 A\\\ 1 I T\ \ YA'•. \ \ \ �\\ N ( \ \' TCS (Me/1 •.90 T AG •\ 01 • I K,,,°1 '� \ -\\. �,t• Jul,• st. b \\*•'''' s'‘.\.• •4, \\ Avtua•9LGn:_-...:._:1[P% e \ \ 1 0 `�f.••' 1 y \ d� \ V% \ l- SaWAOI Ol]roOAL.----•------LaiµTR]]awn n3 111 O. • Q„G lI\1 I1� L. I ��\,1\ AO. r-1•• \ y/ \ i \ \:*Il ``-4 \= NATIO]YIILT 1-...-4.44--•-N.1/DIM NILLf WATER 013Ta1. Y) 1 t}\ • \ •K..a. O y •\ \ j' \� /0.41550 OAa,—.........._.IG.LI i �• 1 1 , I 1 ".{ \ N.1. \ ` \ S \\ \ \ \'�J�.. `\\� T.Lt141.0•411;-...^..........--,eel/4 nLL •. �r `` \ •O '`J ...4 To . \• ' \•.ro.,•. F I S \ C ` -_. \\ l CONTOUR IwTtNwL1-.- S. • 9Te:;q tr.' A ,\ 1\giu•G,\ - •ti \•.tl..,, 1 •:J'"e•• y..;\ \\ —�_ ` ) ee •'-. \I... A.I.N. ..--... __........._IL t7 ��/j� 1.23- loi ` a%ds I,...1',\ •a��\ �� I •x •off'.* e. ssnNa \ I 0•Vi I I \ - T„ • '•4 `} £"•1 \ • m1t•a\ \ •) •,- .. / \ / - I •�',� t '-' v N.N.A j t?y/ t 8. . 1 r.V.•./• � /NW11i P- / ._......-MO V•HICUI.AA ACC[]] 14 1 1 .N..N,.t Jd2 c c.s / I /ers Tw..• p 74' `,\� �� / -4A U xvg i )-M10 \ �II \\ LOT 21 y i aY /." / 1 1 e ... ..� 1 6 1 1 f �.1 1 thy 'n/. I ^ �;111- c,ARi - \ �• I iIi:W4l • L,LI'a`.L• . , ..I• Y (+.Tf ' r. O \`'7i} ted\ / � -k µ { ' 3 �'T 7 /\ ~f / 1 i /0 • I\ \'��V f -�r��l. %�J• i 1 Pell�ID/S�^i /'- • Vii.. IJ I / / Ag .Jtr� Y • / / L]1742[wll MT— `�I H �•� __-- /es ...= , Ic.. ---5/7• • df -Tc 't'JS.tIP... /� ' v6 cl: •1 v 1* 1 N 'k , �`_ :i TENTATIVE MAP • c)i•-, L, fi•usAAtwlstjm�aM� , B p y r \. /i'�' ' L�4NDS OF TOMLEFEVRE •• • 1 41 L.it/yrs-OF Li-,EVER .,,2i;pg of LF.FEVER '• J 221 L / :X A, J EiING ALL DF THAT 3.ITLED P3GNATEOg6•U1HCl4 PARCELDF UNO A33NOWN DN hh A •a„LNAT Ct0TA1N _G.ENTITLED'OACCEL NTT RECORDS DE01N DODK{2 bF1 TIRE AT PA l p \ G.y /B.^.-d•3-SV. ( .1.k'-03-ea ~I 6�M1 I� —5_ ,••. 1-3e "IPARCAL 1 y fw .• \ r 3•WD G_Sa1iTA CLARA GDUNTY gEC0g05 AND L7INO WITHIN THE • .� / (ar.625.naP$FGS4,D1sj ga' C PARCEL 2 T TOWN OF LOa ALTOS HILLS, CALIFORNIA -------- • ,u ,-0CRS.$ • 7 (By.62SM.APSPG:34.5E6/ w Tf/Nta'\ _� �� • -i\y (/3/0.4.991/ / o.r.: H:acm.Sl-mx : \v IGlullnn 1 & Kull,.Inc. ,•,,,R y 7* 'BASE SHEET PREPARED BY NOWAGN B �am�rr atNAlltaR �� j /� `.^ • • ASSOCIATES.INC.DATED MARCH 31.1992 / I oo y,••c*.o.o..sr.o -.a m1. �"�T'b�� AND USED AS OWNER FURNISHED de \ 144,217.4446• 1•oq atS. UV.4 ma.. - INFORMATION. ic•nwn.N_ =13t • Figure 1 3 Tentative Subdivision Map • T R A C T 1/O. /� jlf ,4 I .9*0 \,p / _ 4 2/.5 {moi _ J' a"'r••.'."' .`� 4j/ Ali r.4 4r�.� SWC! :1'.40' •P "c -.� pIDi7�l... / „...5; " • :,`•'1!..., u'.'. "„ 1. i31 • - �s '" A!•. __.... •.SAN ___„111.... ...,,•• �11'/� \_�\ ^▪ Ml�`jl. �.a Swi • E+ F bye .4. Pel I �.:,!:•,.•"'�_T� iti°.::::'• \ /X` \4°•. 'd:1_ II i • 3�,N• ALw.w1 uw! 4. `,IFfi - S FG /..v.",..', �4'! I •. • / �{ \ A "Y , �o•�` 2,3 •• ,.. &QC,TION.A-A` . . a.� e,,.• eSY Ip*,i9D 1/\, 15�.200...% _ / a-�woM '^.,,w.0 •.r .,,,.., / \,:.. c+L I ( ` II I \�`a •'� VICINITY HAP 0. y. H0 SCALA ..... AD ' / 1� 0.1 AO... i I )_/__ .— LOT 4\ \� TA,.l A. .v.. a�3 �E 2 ''"i \ ` I I \ /� \ ` • nye ,1- .a -, i.CfLlrr• ^ 1�rY/ FOUNDATION • 1 •'' •r \VS •AO.!•!•0 1.n , _ Irv, r '.. it. �/ 1 \\\\,,:‘,'\\ I + 1\ o" �:i. Ili / I( \ \ ` 700_ I•C.0[[0 l F•Orll� pf7. •my L �:.f J LO,T l D.wa. rt L lCO(lf1'f. • \ L K o-00 00 �3 .................. F •1TIORl •• '+1.',..' 1wmsbi'� SL • \ �,.• PNOM l F•M.L[ '90. 1 ^-*l �'�41{�L i'' •/\`- ELIZABETH COURT PROFILE�T�K�H ,!^ �. •.' t" 11111154' 1 1 �h+''•. \ ' ! r S \ \ \•�4 \,-_'•,.. e. • _� t,µ, ft f\ 1' VII' .•�.a ..\ \W.'!•.. \ '' • . A. .r \-...,..c , o.\ \ ` ./.tr, 9� •NOTE: • ?Y k :r•A• .so` .•w[ k. \ 4'R0�{,,� '\i HOUSE FOOTPRINTS ARE SCHEMATIC ONLY • • `� 1® �� %'K I a>ff \ 'y•'Sr \ I' i BUILDING SETBACKS • Il : oat I '1 \ R .. SY? .-:-•-•, /// '' -,...\• \� \\ 1 � I \ ` ,,�.•.ti�,t. 40'FRONT SETBACK ! CN{�1 N dK{: •' •m gtINO '' '1 I `I \``L ' \\'E 3O'BIDE SETBACK W • ..\. 1\y • \ \ \4/ , 'r-'1 •• • J_1--f�111LOIN• • \ . 11 !1 - '5O' REAR SETBACK' nil 1 �•�MyL•'t°.. 1 r1n 1rt:,„, . II I / \ I* . �y /1 �\ \ t .� f �,1 •`. .. \ `3`'by.\ \ F�IIW D.T ID. t,— r/ \ V / / .S / , \ s , C ' • N.N...' • • u LING f. \ AAD•nD.O ! e 1 / /' ' �� A. '•,1 ',^ a.a.a.•••••••• •-S...TART AAR I R 4AANANT }''\ \\‘'\". \ L-, . R 1 /L1 / \ q I ' p1 \ ' th 16.O.a. ••••••PRPAT■STORM DRAM' 1� . O '�,\ • 1 ' • 9 r •\ L, i ' '4', I.V.a.••••••••••_••NaIIO UTILITY 4•■M■NJ 1 F [LOCK //� 0 / ♦ P..M.N.0.1. NRI!SIMANIll7.WTAR CUITICT WAHINE 1 \ i ` LffD •\ \ '•/- 6 PA A'C c L d �`I •..........._r DurRv.L u • f \`\\\A\ 1 \sur.:, 1 ` YM I�`I (DK 625 MAPS PO'S s,9 G6) \ ./ t�f. \ \. INUISTILIAL i \ 1 A a•TYYY,TYYTF NNO VI CULARAc ASSMw \ w\a ol" \ :4•Mw \ :1 r 1 / �' iii 1 1 1c Co'nI„Iron` :Nn \l‘ • /° `o �, \ _____%_. 'jam �`�a • g� .e \ I \ LOT 2 \ / fl t t / •• ..rte ..:,., ....,. 11 1 1� ��., \,11\ \` ` I/,. /)/, 1 , yp # I`//." I I./ / •\ / / (((/egg • L C�.,V.. •, aa- r, '�...sr vow) �`ti �, lak/� 1. t _ o )• /Af /�.. , necl, vM wb`�/ r/A it I�^{ \ 1. 'L i. ` lt�'`7'4s l ,E A .a.� ::,: ..I. / 1 P� F,�? / \ .f. �N. ��/ , / �'� �i // 1.. rC' Glullanl & Kull,'Inc. • 1 �. !I -.- 4/1-711---. / / ' JliTy\ .../ , � /lTt mLaa....,o—r....m.c....�u� 1117�L__ /• .,yll .Mm,na•r •wnnfa•..W.n� • ° -- '11*.'' QJ N ". . 4 / ;` °I/ CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMEE3TPLI % 7„,',,,`g;; � ,I B y �y 561 0'/�� / / LANDS OF TOM LEFEVRE . 0 T'.. j t 'A 2F/� d I!• REING ALL OFTNAT 8.462:CtRGNATEO RIMANOIR PARCRL CFUNO 19 9NOWN^' 1 7� ( \ !LE / THAT CLRTAIN MAD ENTITLRO'VARClL HAO'4fC0R090IN BOOK s? .EF MAPS AT C^ �y 1 / . (� N . �_._9_ANO.6_SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS ANO LYING WITHIN TAE' •• }. \ / PARCGL ! , F QIP PARCEL 2 \ ` + Z: 6K 629 HAPS PG'S 4,566 1 ' \, OF (.O>f ALTOS RILLS, CALIFORNIA // / p C OK 626 FLAPS PG:14,666 NIITI43Y 2114 OF Ug4A10-- `' y,l:_.C.-,1-1”2 \.y (lb 0.4.!11) \ / ' II ® a_ GluliDnt & Itull, Inc. _ 6 • BASE SHEET PREPARED BY NOWACK® \\' L N.. I'••0 ASSOCIATES,IN6 DATED MARCH 51.1992 • /I I �� Dlyorn•r: AND USED AS OWNER FURNISHED /\ 1 1 DUI°^.0•N]•••wa.u.am• 237..in l lip.. wham INFORMATION 110.13!1-•••• Nam]f3�•a[p..l• f+OL rra. • __ - - - /D•-we.. 3111 L Figure 2 Conceptual Development Plan 4 . II . (;P'. .. • . \4 • �J tu: UAL! :P.q• ......'•^ _ ....Ttlrsee�s'TTl•. .•',. ‘\. - v�v. ,,` - D -• •y -s/•.e . oi .� hPl1[.'� �� _.Y-'�''�''�.4'�• \`, , - •irrair 4� 4.- -,_, •, .._' rJo 1.... PC t♦rrs�6S 1..,•I�wnaw..� \ a/� `1 \ ' \\ • 05- 1t.7i•,• . • s 4 `•yi _ ` 1 • w� •• • b';. (e'4eO v V� , :•q=.Y apM1fO�.p' 1 \ ..:',1•\ ..�� .\„ 4r - _ / • �_�GI \ \ I \ h1, • ' • MMA eNP 1. / ..• `/ `\ \\ I \ I \ . ., \ \\ \;.•`-% \'‘.' VICINITY MAP •7 .O ` \' I 1 I \ \ \• 1, t •.t 40 6CAL. / ' I � •` A• ti \ l . .IS:, -,A ..0 ►. I • 1,0 i I o'i 1\ . . .„�\ o . ` �1 a \ ‘ \\N, ... •• . •ffii. ftk, •ftkt -'' a ... • .. . ,. \ , • •?\''''' :\* ..:•.,\ N t ''t \r s \ \ , .•-•I \'4,', %,$•,.•tW•S•ki,.. \ .si ' 't st- V l'iht.$,k: \ .\ l'i ...r...... \ . -.. . N .• t ,•-•�•� z-r, .. Z-1. Z I r C`ti,,G/rt�•�••, / ,888.••8 •,)11 \ - . 11711405.$ 1 I • \ i :,6 .ipi o •. 1 I'' P.' c / / 4 '. is 7 ��i1�.e..O • N• 9 s i 1 \ / ,I I Iia• ,1C t. I .1 / $ / \_•<v 41 \ .�l�•4 -_ 1/....9.. /I 7 \ ieri71l.iii iii BASE SHEET PREPARED BY NOWACK • •� ` )1 Af ASSOCIATES,INC.DATED MARCH 71,ISl2 ^ \�• \\•(7L1- ` */ - l"/}'s 7A„X / •ND USED AS OWNER FURNISHED e '. S N` `«ll\�k�.I�Y�i I r/�, / _ -y e. ,-- ', 0`.. ' INFORMATION. r,• '�,..�• 1'8888.: : EXHIBIT .A 4r /• rk ,% .z 'SLOPE ANALYSIS MAP e i .. A a e. �P/% LANDS OF TO11 LEFEVRE y -- te, b ,.7 BEING ALL oFTNAT e.ant OtSIGNATEO RE"AluCTR PARC3.OFLAWO•!SHOWN pN 1 t•• j - P - - \ •M 4.4141741.E r TIM CERTAIN MAP ENTTUD•PARCELMAP'RECOROEOI143ODK f2L6FMAP,ATPw= �� 1 • • l / PARCHL., 7 i - �� ., -f-WO G•IWTA CLARS COUNTY RECORDS ANO LYING WITHIN THE r. 11 �' < - \\; TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS. CALIFORNIA •'. s / f a PA 2 W,Jrlur(IMO 5r .•aw- 7 e. • (IMO 4.117) �\ ••rl: MARC.•It-IT9' ;��, °.I Ti. \• x I i GInln:nt di•Kull. Inc. ,"°�,,., ,p. \ NMI Sows Gr S.•w 771.Ggti a MIS CA1.10 it . - °P OM)157.8..• H55115TN51(FM M.1.o•.:- • Figure 3 . -• . Slope Analysis Map • 5 . . . 1 ' .. —•- • . . . 1 •. -. ,.- ,,,• ' ..'if./. `!.. ,.,.t*-4. ).:. .--,,,,s.• , . .,01-7 ... : .. . '',...;... •,,, LE ...-.-- -- , • , -,; ........-- •,.-.-. • ,• -:••-..f:-.7 ,.,___0,4,.., ,,, ..•.'...',-, -;...:..,If- .,- - ,,. .;...,.t.L SrAfhp•Ak .).K..' ft.' .. . -, i i ; ip • ; ...1 ... . . .1, frr •-...•••••••,.. 'Ai.,.....:•-. -..-3 . --..,..- ......1.; :n . .•.....r. 7,:... --.z:..-.'. "=:A.., - • Iv,,:'1,'.5%.:"#,.,4' 0-• s...:;'/* , •c: s ? - . .....li. , flii44' ': liti 5 t.' rZ.'-.7 :./el' IMMO • . / NL.'1,. •• •—' •40c • 1 4 '• ',/ a-.4ift "k . a -'‘ 4. l'••••^1 - "••- 1 - '.... 1••-2l•• '.- \..•'<ii.,\O'" 4 ' '•4 .. ; ,t••' -'. '.`,'• . " ..F, . -•• '. • ...:1-.. .'-j. . .g •‘• * ''fi'.. . -. .1)1 ' i -I •'*. i •"1/44. .17. • • , .. •• .• •-,,, r., . . ,• ..•, „,„ ,- •i ,\ ....-. i /.i:.- .eish•-l.• •- --. _ • : 4 .•. i•• A..,,,,,:, _•2, • , ‘ ..- k,,4116i„,, 4,....44.1.t. ,, 4.. svIlitti. i.,1 ,..:-.'„j?.... • ., 4--. .• ‘.. - ).-r - - •"-,:s,.... -... -7,. '4-.0,''' 4.-e...„'.9-.:.'4-,,..A...i•-• • *T - t'• *.-"ir ''•••,‘"•z..4'. • '•-...T„4. .. .:.,•.,.1 :•,. 40, , . -,....* ••,. •••-1 • ,,,,\ •'•-;•• -,-. ,t,;••••.3,-,.:„; ;,. ....., ,....te„.^.,,,h•:•'lliii.,(14;• ,„„ •• .ArT • •••'I:. . .., ••• •• •I.•••..''•"••...•' St ' ,,d,•-f pa-•‘0,-7...,,!,,,,, ••-•: ••.- ,A.,,....7.., ., .!...A,,,,, , , -1,....,,c.... • 0...tv ..z.„..),:. • • ••••• • • ...r., • 1„.')440..._ "i"2'1 '. ,‘ .: ;7'',...: '::'.'4•,',,;,.,). ...,.;) ';'• -,:li,";%••••' *-. - ''''•••••:,:•. .1,.'••••- -•'• •••: •• '''',t, '....i• 1,-1._ '! ,a. ,=,..tio... s,i....44.b,fir:A. .i'e." ... -• 14.' • ‘• •="):1:'-'';,40,,,,ii., i ' , ! 6-.• '•',2kr' rit•T\ • • _,. t •-•,. ,•:xtv,' .tii ,j; . tel• •(7; -. •.•--, - -••••• 4,1:1, •• .,•• • • • '---'a74-. .4k- •(- vz. , "..Y. giP .1.- IP- :- ., 4.'• . • .' ' 44-1'.•:-'.t--%•-a;!'-'-ac ghillreiLii;j4P' • ''.OF $_'4,"... ‘, ..... ;..1•4. ' •' , , ', . .,. . - .. . ,. • .> ) •i 1:7-- w -;),:.),..!..i..i.....v.,'"-4 4.. 1 44,::-.... kol-•43.. . 1p,,_ • -it.. Ii..t."".'...•.'!. , ..e ,,/, ...... . _Kt. . .1..t.lt,...:; ,..,;,..7t.1?-.,;t44, ,i, . ,. ft• '• " '-- '.' -'''' ''•• . li' '-c.,l't. : :•••": 2.,1,-.,"*"...- .,00 ,'. •• 1\- 4•. -...; p ,,, • . , . : i, ••A/ . -'.7.• -•• -- .---;...."•- ' " • ''''' . . '1/4 . ''' " • i i" -lige A?• '11,S.i•al:•..* • ••$.1 • a', 1..,, s' /. .. s •n "1:•.Se,,a,•.•;-4111t. •,..' '. ...54,44:,44;••• ' '44- ', . •"..''\ ••" er, ••...- , .. ' : c a‘•/.i.'•fts'!_aC' . • :t ' '7!:" 7't . ; ' 1 •4'.ai . . ....-• 41„ . •si-:Ain 1' . .....•• . .• ta ••f . 17.....' er'.44";•,..- J.••r,4-.1?4,`"*.v.\"?...z,t4'.....::-; •-•: I •. ......4ilosz...., ••A---..... ---..„-••4,4:,:... ..--;—/-, ,,,A174.0-.1 ,tP43 •.,, ••' a 1 • - . . . ..• . . •'..rts ;‘ ,.."•k.,t-r" tZ4t.i,i;„,• A t••,' '1•,.-• •••''---/• ' . ••• • ' %- , ... * "•'470:4 t.:.f ...,. '57.,. • 4 lj k.,1!','''It' ;- , •4'...._17 ..,‘.14 • ..• '.'- •.,'" ' •' •itr•-ii,,-,,:•:- '- ', • '••.•':,-;..,.T.,•,..4.).,; :•,r..-.,,..;-.I.0". ' *•!..- ' ••-P • ' % *.' ‘ ,,,.. •*. •``js ..` . At 't ` 1 '' ' •• •P`"•%;."7,' •Z:', .c ''' -: •' --- • --itilV-;. -'• -. •• • '1,.••! !&v, '6.... ., ••-' •••:,.s.,•. '' '• ' •''...1e• •..4:' ,%-;.*,. 4.01 11 n •• • v...41 1,111,1•cf-.. : •.). ,.-1 I'll- 1.?: . • ••-,; . . .. • — •: .'• •;,•,' •••,4`.17.p—• ••••• ., • f•'••••e;•—,t '" '4 I. to--' •'' , '-•`%4-C..''"'•.5 •.c. . • 1 ' tqL• : ",tica'9••1•*-1 . ,',./;t •,.; ' • .- •' •••44, • - . • -:,----- • •::1 • -••• s 4-•‘:.•.•• "1,• • , • • , • • ., . • • .... •-••'• • '.,,a.,.., •,., ). .- ...._ •Ie.>4 '' .4.‘".,.' ' 'ff • t 0141:. .:-.1 c•Ly v•• v":,+,"„ %,•1(' • .* *. • . ,•1 . • - Art •.‘".},,.• ' ' • e• ••;•1°P 'S.) • ,s 4 i ..-AC'. ' " :.....V., ••'•••••••. .:.,- •?•• ',.:4* "t,1- .,• -1.:1‘.*2.4,17,•• ' ". ..4•,. .,-,,„ si iv* 30.4- . it.I: • . . -.,' :,: _A. ,,,t,it„, . •• ., ... ,,,.. ,f‘1F.,,,?'" i i•.. i 'C .4414* Am - • ..;• .,;„, )4: ,...f ,.frtgt . -, • iN•itp )?•Ic.k•%,.a-j.rA'1",, ' ...„,it...',„:. ' -. • :7.: ' ' '`',. '4.. ., -‹ , ' ) ...,. •:. '-9., f!••• - $,... •,fr:L_ 4-4, ,.. .,,•..). ..V*'- :'M b'*''' c.•• •e t\ : ..2?',TC;Ocr"10' t'•14 •. k • -1' • ,'ir'1'. •'''••• t''''' i'' ::.: ' "k"' .t•-.1.4 , ••jAzt• •- -..&.:-.3C.1:i:,..,,,,,4 t.....-,'; ,, :. .7 P '. 1 - I.. ' 4*." "....- 4' •,. 'Ilti .., ''• '• . 3.....••••• •12,..,-.;,• , • . I .• . ..a ly'4.•,,,..!:t• ._ '. '.--Ja(-7-- ''I. ''' I. _ .2.• •''''''s: ;X:t- -.1,....".2- -•,• *-''''''- - -w 4 f.' '''.. . ,. • #•''• r• 1#.4.•• l' ,•.•S Vii0C •••'••• --..... '- ,...14Ari-•- . f.YrY.: .. . ..."4. , • • , ..- 17.,,1441'.....,•,4.11,,e4rijr• .. ''''''`. 4. ,•21, ,A "04 ,.,,,...4 '‘i . -.•:: :,....:-.-•:;:. r.' ..r,, ?-s - :, ... ' .•: ‘`X ': -' 4 I'At -:'• • -' %V, '."..0 • . WO • h. ' ‘s" ..,-) •• .'t I:1 1, .1 ,..3 :").-r,,,,,c).‘ , , . f.# t, ..wk 7 .7'. ••;•• , -. .- . . r,.11 -Zot-:, • .• . ,'.) ; ...•1 • ...----t• •,..„ 1 •••':/1 * 1• '11, ""., ls.1.14'• 1'• •.P•lige '• ,i •• K.. ,.1,:.• ••,,,,,..- ' -.) !r.,1) f).,..,•:.,•0...,,,.., ; .• -•.•,. . • • 1 ca....• •• . •••:y. ...., ' _, rgi . ra• • ';tt. • .. ,,,•,44,.,,, ),• *' de,li .... ., ...•..., .. ,... • 4".. ',:,,. ,k IIC Z.Pf.!•!;',441 ",,..!4:,,f,.. 1,910,..,, ,, 2....0.,... 1/4, •••'1.1* • .',1 . I P._ •.• , • :- •• • • ''• '• • ' . • .,, 'fr•=' .• •,-14;4 .•S''tfri it; i...1), ;•• 4 7'•••• • ' . ' r4 : t•, . ...4 • ••• •••. :,) “...••••:•••:, ' ..,•• •••• ...q.j• '' ...*••••••t..e., •.:i •,.. , • ....- „ .o.,,,,, , • -,- - ,,, 7...-.. ......-- .: . . ..- • -•• -..i,L., ...:.- ..,........!',. s,k.47,.1:1).3.,•r••• • / , ' I...• I. ,,ii .1Prir 4 4 4". •: ,O. 11, ',"de!, • ' • •'''.-', :.1i?..)i...)'37•' ii• _,...;• 4:.i...c..e.- ',al- 'or:••••'• • •, ''''':' l'Z'-:•." "::::11421.49•:'1, ,ri .r...74; .,....4.•,..4„,..c• •v, At•7., •,„, ..&..•. ': ,..,•>,• c... . ... ‘ • ',.. .• ..• • *• - J - •'•g:.:• - x p 0 1.4.0 '• *. '' rap* '' lilt 4NIS•• .a a , I. ap ••"• . .„ • , .. 41Pc .i .,46 . . a a .... , •Y - . • • 5t• „0. •, a ..,1. • , ,*11• ii,';;.‘4 . . .• .4.- * •-•••• ". •'‘...h.•.• .; ,-1:+ils.1"....lt i 4 • ' •'•- - - • ••''''' • • • \4 t . ,- . ..i, • . a••IN- ,..,, •,.. .. , ...,::..1:•:.:I.. ob.::•-......-...,,,,,ti•--' ,7-.:.-f?.' •*-4/''''• 13\1,..:- -411°-•cS-....•i " • ...• . • • • • -•i a -.•.•-: .. . .. .1!....--.. ..--; ..--+,'...j .iKiik-, k\*.'°P;..-Y": .. 41 IR' ' ' • ' .... 't. . ' --4 L , ‘ ,......: . i ilk •ve.,,,f..,...:.:k -. • , .,-....).'. . ....P.r!.,,,,,,:, f .... 4 • •,,- • • .•• ,• c• ,,•.. , ••••••• .4 ••• . , •1 -,..7.- -.•• • *,,:t: •iitit.,:,',r'..• •'• •• • • ..,•.•..-•:••• , .- ...: *°, .iv y ,. ,•,"4:i-..:-.1• iv,:: -••• • :4.*•;,..t..40-:,10.,...--- - 4.1'•,,, ' .••••••o• '4' I. :.:'t:,*1 . .....'"- ,.. ... .. . /. ., '-'11y4-z ei. ' •L•• . '.=..?..;l'4• .'1...‘,A44 4.71G Ar.3us . •. ' i .121. .! •• . & '." " ' . • ' :.', 4_,••AP'4=. ' r. • , 3 %.• •0 3'3 4,... ' ' '''''••/,••• . k '•••t••.t..tet ) __.• :.••••"••••".•tic...'4.4:" .4 1' • -V7 t...tk'Nisi' ,• - ..-..."‘e,F1,1•••".!".tk' .:it•T ' • • "i''• 1 '•'. . . ).• •••',, •1....,: ''.K's•A...' '4" 4' k _., • • •Itt.„,..•I • • ••••...1, .. ...-'....,....ti.ii'4,,, ••• :...: ', f i,"*.= . .' , ' f 9' '....5''' ' ' . a 5',A.‘ 1:.:. ..1,: ei:::la.11. .'......"0 1.•••••if ige'k ....1.. • ' ' ell ' t': '' . ' i 1,s .7•• "r --‘-‘r.;•P•'11,, ..•%••r • lir-, .. . '••• ..:.•ss.-4.. 14%;•:.:.•,..vi:-.....'t4R,,.. '.4.:::.)c.‘1.-.it.:.:•A 11".: '.`4,,r--.•.....t.f.,.•-.= -"-• ,,, .....„ . ..,.,.. •• - .--- -"- --:-Nutr4v- 'I.-, •-•:A -- -.:-....**•,--.-- .:,,.•,••,:-.:•-•: •,!(..-,•••:•••'•-.•-•,•-•ic.. A.,. 4141.'1,6.. •••, -`,:.- ,15,"••• .1.'!1./.4_. "••',1z::::.,,••... , /.•Jii,:-Y-.3.••,,,-4•..'4.,..,., • 1 1 •••t••«•.• '• ,,s' •••4to k.r'•:-.1-','p.',i(7.:'ti: --- \els...'4•4ii'-% •, 4, 1.•••c il•N` • -• . = . .'•"ik m.:'"•'-c-.1+.': ' • •• .'• ,p1,1*-tit .,4'••• . •.•.•.-- !"--.'"'''. "'yr' ...::.,••••.:• .b,,,,,..3, aok • ---;- i•i•rto 2.•"--'-•-:. ••.,•"",•-'••"ot,17:#47„,,--.',-'1-.'i..'..i-."...•.,:••-.':.,7'..-•,.1',-'....•• •'• ;,. ;1/4\4A.111,IW..,rA,f/.;..;..K,0s. •- AO •.I„.-'- . ..•0.''-i.7:..•.i..a • .:,:.,...;•'-.:..R1t "•W,•••,i--f•'..•::. ,. ,,...:•;4,•1Vt.„t„r_.S'',•4• .,`,i ,,):-.)..• ...••?.•,' A.f."it.`','•'ck-••'`.-'s l''.‘•,}-i:ti•••i•i•••k•,•:•,.•.4. --•••••i't'..s.*ft...,./7N,4.,4..0j.1' - .Si ` .p;1r:..t-t.;.•,,•;?•••.,.1,. ..(..• ,.. ,- • .. •„',..k,:•!, „P.:*1.1.1:4A•.-. `-,,.....-- •. ' • ' 4,0.. :.•, • '11 • :. "K.,i•e-"•-,''$'tiP.'OVA;cc,* ‘ :*•••,,,..,. -1, ••` i.- ''•..Y l•” 'N.... •'-: '''‘'ne:•• • • ,•• •'.••••••7'.1.'• "..-1)''';i ,, •'' ' • • .'1•• '. ' • • ' -•?.. 7:''' ... ..f,;,:.•••,"/. Pt;,,7, '14%;'•- % 4. ' a* 't'4,t l''• It• •••4** qx.'-' '''..."-..:,•45',:••*4 ,V•,.'-%; '.'•.* . . , •s" ;',.- :.' :-‘.(•:s • • A ' • ."ab- '• .'" AiiO4-"•A' P' ''; '''''. ' . . '4 41446, • b• * .,. • :',3, sio. N.4.,_„••.....z..11,, Naltsii...3•••• , •‘• V.\ S: .4N/4.-517.....'•,;%.,,. II"' ••• .3.,..,,... L• •,1.. "V•".•• .• •••*: .. V.. " .ti 4. .7300 ..k., . 7.!',..2.'.'eki•l''' ''z'••-A17 - •• - : ":.':•tt.1.. ,.;:,-;:„,#;,, ;:41:,.: ,..1 ''''''N''... '&4 r-c.'•':.; ' ' •••'',;z1., • '.7..."1,14gittA.: i*" ' ,V,, . , ..: -, ' V , •• •A as.:. .',•• i•ij.. rille: , -• '. . vac;:.:, , .. • . •.•• k. t•,-.;......,4„, J ,,;,...-,, P.,.. ., t„ '. s"..,, • .-10 1,1814.•-As , *v.:. ,z,‘,...,,-;., N-- • - ,... ... • .., ..;:. : i •:•.,,,,v, ,,. •‘•.,-,,,..t-„,,,,, ...-t 144 '1-1: ••411'' .4.7 1,0r: '' .tligiakiiiiik k44...1-.T'.3-'' '. *t•iq••',. ....:::...!;,.. • . • ......: •,..).0-.• 'A.. s• T ... . . .:. 1., . : -.0.kt,*'•..A••••-•,.. . :NZ' ii. ....,:. "•••••‘.•,' :' ."' •,::'..196 ' ..06'. ••• -..47,....,Yr.-t•-‘..•1 ; • ....3.--• • , . ir .1 * • - . • em.. . • CIT3 11/1103AL SHEET -• , •B`, 4 • DMII) BASE SHEET PREPARED BY NOWACK 3 aOCHIBIT "...."" Glullonl & ICull, Inc. •-•— s . .••• i PI31011B•M.eV III0 • ASSOCIATES,INC.DATED MARCH 31,1992 .,..,.......,.. ...,...„, "'..._,____....._ 11 • 3 . AND USED AS OWNER FURNISHED 3001 Nom*Ga.10.6•3A0 330•C...par...300 LANDS OF TOM LEFEVRE • OF SHEETS ----- C--..•••-•-• 1.151313 if: i INFORMATION. 000 331,541 000 35741601500 ••••••••••...... • . MCM.11.411L) I . ....•.-.........•••••••• .- .0.•••• .105 Nuamt•, _ eV 31T1 313131035 13 DATI TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS, CALIFORNIA ... - - - - - Figure 4 Local Vicinity/Aerial Photo . . ' 6 . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • Section 2 • Initial Study and Checklist CEQA:CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Initial Study and Checklist Title of Proposal: LeFevre Subdivision Date Checklist Submitted: _ . 1995 Agency Requiring Checklist: Town of Los Altos Hills Agency Address: 26379 Fremont Road City/State/Zip: Los Altos Hills CA 94022 Agency Contact: Debbie Pollart/ Suzanne Phone: (41 5 ) 941 -7222 Davis DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: a) I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment,and A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared 0 b) I findthat although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared c) I fmd the proposed may have a significant effect on the environment,and An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT s required 0 Signature Print Name. • For Date 7 CEQA: CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QU• ACT ENVIRO MENTAL CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT LOCATION: Los Altos Hills Santa Clara County Ci County PROJECT ADDRESS: Altamont Road between Julietta and Altamont Lanes DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Four lot subdivision of a 9. 45 acre parcel (see attached Tentative' Subdivision Map) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: (CEQA requires that an explanation of all"yes"and"maybe"answers be provided along with this checklist,including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effe is identified. You may attach separate sheets with the explanations on them.) Yes Maybe No I.EARTH.Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes n geologic substructures? ❑ ❑ b) Disruptions,displacements,compaction or overcovering of the soil? ® 0 [] c) Change in topography)or ground surfa :relief features? ❑ EL7 ❑ d) The destruction,covering or modificau•n of any unique geologic or physical features? ❑ ❑ ® • e) Any increase in wind or water erosion o soils,either on or off the site? 0 ❑ f) Changes in deposition)or erosion of beat hsands,or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion whichmay modify the channel of a river or stream or the • bed of the ocean or any bay,inlet or lak.? ❑ ❑ g) Exposure of people or property to geolo;is hazards,such as earthquakes, landslides,mudslides,ground failure,or similar hazards? ❑ g] [] IL AIR. Will the proposal result in: • I a) Substantial air emissions or deterioratio of ambient air quality? 1 ❑ ❑ b) The creation of objectionable odors? ❑ ❑ c) Alteration of air movement,moisture,or temperature,or any change in climate,either locally or regionally? 0 0 III.WATER.Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents,or the course of dire tion of water movements, in either marine or freshwaters? ❑ ❑ 8 • CEQA:CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT b) Changes in absorption rates,drainage patterns,or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ® 0 ❑ c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? 0 0 I ] d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? 0 0 [g] e) Discharge into surface waters,or in any alteration of surface water quality, including,but not limited to,temperature,dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ❑ ( 0 f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? 0 0 g) Change in the quantity of ground waters,either through direct additions or withdrawals,or through interception of an aquiferlby cuts or excavations? 0 0 h) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? 0 0 i) Exposure of people or property to water related:hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 0 0 IV.PLANT LIFE.Will the proposal result in: a)- Change in the diversity of species,or number or any species of plants (including trees,shrubs,grass,crops,and aquatic plants)? ® 0 0 b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique,rare,or endangered species of plants? 0 0 c) Introduction of new species of plants into an area,or in a barrier to the normal. replenishment of existing species? 0 0 d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 0 0 El V.ANIMAL LIFE.Will the proposal result in: • a) Change in the diversity of species,or numbers of any species of animals (birds;land animals,including reptiles;fish and shellfish,benthic organisms or insects)? ❑ 0 b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique,rare,or endangered species or animals? 0 0 c) Introduction of new species of animals into an area,or result in a barrier to 'the migration or movement of animals? '• 0 0 d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?.. El ' 0 ' VI.NOISE.Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? 0 0 b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? j ' ❑ ' ❑ VII.LIGHT and GLARE.Will the proposal: a) Produce new light or glare? ❑ ❑ VIII.LAND USE.Will the proposal result in: a) Substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? ® ❑ ❑ IX.NATURAL RESOURCES.Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? " ' ❑ ❑ X.RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a) A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances(including, but not limited to: oil,pesticides,chemicals or radiation)in the event of an accident or upset conditions? ❑ 0 9 CEQA: CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT b) Possible interference with an emergenc response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? 0 0 M XI.POPULATION.Will the proposal: a) Alter the location,distribution,density o growth rate of the human population of an area? 0 0 XII.HOUSING.Will the proposal: a) Affect existing housing,or create a dem. d for additional housing? 0 0 111 XIII.TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. ill the proposal result in: I a) Generation of substantial additional veh'cular movement? _ 0 0 El b) Effects on existing parking facilities,or emand for new parking? 0 0 c) Substantial impact upon existing transpo tion systems? 0 0 El d) Alterations to present patterns of circula'on or movement of people and/or goods? 0 0 e) Alterations to waterborne,rail or air traf tc? 0 0 El f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehi les,bicyclists,or pedestrians? 0 El XIV.PUBLIC SERVICES.Will the proposal a an effect upon,or result in a need for new or altered governmental services i any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? ❑ El b) Police protection? El 0 El c) Schools? El ❑ d) Parks or other recreational facilities? ❑ ElI e) Maintenance of public facilities,includi g roads? El ❑ El 0 Other governmental services? El ❑ El XV.ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or en:rgy? El ❑ b) Substantial increase in demand upon exiting sources of energy,or require the development of new sources of ener:y? 0 El El XVI. UTILITIES and SERVICE SYSTEMS. ill the proposal result in a need for new systems,or substantial alterations t. the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ❑ El El b) Communications systems? ❑ El c) Water? El ❑ El d) Sewer or septic tanks? ❑ ❑ e) Storm water drainage? El ❑ f) Solid waste and disposal? ❑ El XVII.HUMAN'HEALTH. Will the proposal re ult in: a) Creation of any health(hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? 111 El El b) Exposure of people to potential health hazards? ❑ El 10 � CEQA:CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT XVIII.AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in: a) The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? 0 0 b) The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 0 0 XIX.RECREATION.Will the proposal result in: a) Impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 , XX.CULTURAL RESOURCES.Will the proposal: a) Result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? 0 0 b) Result in.adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building,structure,or object? ❑ 0 c) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ❑ ❑ d) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 0 ❑ fRI XXI.MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. • a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to'drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? 0 0 b) Short-term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term,to the disadvantage of long-term,environmental goals?(A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively,brief,definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) ❑ ❑ c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small;but where the' effect on the total of those impacts on the environment is"significant.) 0 a ❑ d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either directly or indirectly?. ❑ ❑ XXII.DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. • (This section may be filled out by using narrative,or by using a form,such as the example given in the CEQA Guide- lines.) Refer to attached narrative. XXIII.DISCUSSION OF LAND USE IMPACTS. (An examination of whether the project would be consistent with existing zoning,plans,and other applicable land use controls.) Refer to attached narrative. • • 111 Environmental Checklist/Initial tudy LeFevre Subdivision Environmental Evaluatio The following is an explanation o,f answers provided in the Initial Study. The roman numeral and letter reference the individual questions of the Initial Study. Answers to the Initial Study were largely based upon previ?us environmental documentation of the subject property provided by the EsIhner Subdivisfion Initial Study, technical reports and subsequent Draft and Supplemental Draft Environment 1 Impact Reports (SCH 910'63085). The reports are on file at the Town and can be viewed du ing 8:00am - 12:00 and 1:00 7 5:00pm Monday through Friday. Explanation of "No" Respons•s I. Earth Responses a and d and ar: based on the Terra Search Report dated May 7, 1990 and the letter from William Cotto & Associates dated June 2, 1990 which states that due to the nature of thle project no stable earth conditions or destruction of any unique geologic feature is anticipated to oc ur. Response to item f: no oceans, bays, inlets or streams will be effected by the develo• ent of this property. II. Air Responses to a,b and c: because of the relatively small projectproposal, development of this property for single-family residential use will not significantly modify air quality. III. Water Responses to a and d: no marine or fresh water oceans, lakes or streams are effected directly by this project. esponses c and I: no federally identified flood areas or tidal areas are associated with his project. Responses to fl and g: any existing wells on the property will be required be permitted through the Santa Clara Valley Water District and no other significant i pact on ground water quality or recharge is anticipated. Response toff h: Purissima ills Water Company will be servicing this development and indicates no problems with or significant impact on water availability. IV. Plant Life Responses to b, c and d: the property is not identified as agriculturally significant (California Department o Conservation mapping dated July 1, 1990). No rare or endangered species have een identified in association with this property. V. Animal Life Responses to a through d no significant wildlife habitat areas or rare or endangered • species have been identifies in association with this property. • 12 XVI. Utilities and Service Systems Responses a through f: utility companies have indicated no problems with the provision of services to the proposed project. ,, XVII. Human Health Responses to a and b: no health hazards have been identified relative to the proposed project that are not identified in some other category on this:checklist. XVIII. Aesthetics Response to a and b: no obstruction of any scenic vista or creation of an aesthetically; offensive site open to public view is anticipated due to the proposed project. Distant views from the existing house in the center of the horseshoe-shaped project site are not anticipated to be effected due to the existing conservation easement. Proposed houses are not anticipated.to result in,a significant_.impact to near views. XIX. Recreation Response to a: no effect on the availability or quality of recreational resources will occur due to the proposed project. XX. Cultural Resources Responses to a through d: no culturally or historically significant resources have been identified in association with this site. Explanation of "Maybe" or "Yes" Responses I. Earth Disruptions of the soil, change in;topography,:increase in erosion of soils, and exposure of people or property to geologic hazards (Responses b, c,-e'and.g): Limited overcovering of soils and regrading of the property-will occur as a result of its development, however, these impacts are not.considered significant. Erosion control plans will be required as conditions of approval during the 'construction. of the . subdivision and the residences. Construction-will not be allowed to occur within the set Human Habitation Setback Line (HHSB4 Proposed Mitigation Measures: 1. The project grading plan shall include an approved drainage and erosion control plan to minimize the impacts from erosion during construction. 'This plan shall conform to all standards adopted by the Town of Los Altos Hills and Santa Clara County. • L. 'Prior to approval of building permits, the project 'proponent shall supply a landscape plan that provides long-term controlof erosion. 14 VI. Noise Responses to a and b: resi•ential development of this 'property is not anticipated to increase noise levels above those permitted in the Town by the General Plan or the Municipal Code. VII. Light and Glare Response to a: no significa levels of light or glare in excess of those provided for the Town Ordinances is anticip,.ted to result from the development of this property. VIII. Land Use Refer to Explanation of "M.ybe" or "Yes" Responses: IX. Natural Resources Response to a: due to the mall number of residences proposed, development of this property is not anticipated o significantly impact the rate of use or availability of any natural resource. X. Risk of Upset Responses to a and b: resp dential development of this property will not result in significant increased risks associated with hazardous materials or interference with any emergency plan. XI. Population Response to a: no significa t alteration of population trends are associated with this project. XII. Housing Response to a: this project w 1 slightly add to housing stock but has no significant impact on the availability of or nee. for housing. Removal of the existing cottage structure is not considered a significant impact to housing. XIII. - Transportation/Circulation Responses to a through f significant volume increases will not result from this development. The propose• private roadway is located at the position recommended by TJKM Transportation Cons ltants for traffic safety and site distance requirements. XIV.. Public Services Responses to a through f: t e development of four residential lots is not anticipated to significantly effect the prov'sion of public services in the Town. XV. Energy Responses to a and b: the d:velopment of four new residential lots will not significantly impact energy resources or heir availability. 13 III. Water . Changes in absorption rates,drainage patterns, the rate or amount of surface runoff and discharge to surface waters (Responses b and e): Drainage and hydrologic information on the subdivision has not been,submitted by the proponent, and as a result evaluation.of impacts related to changes in drainage patterns and quantities cannot be fully evaluated.at this time. Erosion control measures should beevaluated to determine whichwould be most effective in controlling erosion on this property primarily during the construction period of the subdivision improvements and also the individual site development.. The rate of absorptionof this property will be reduced due to the subdivision improverinents of future site development. The effects of increased stormwater flow off the site will need to be investigated downstream of the project and appropriate mitigation measures incorporated into the downstream system to accommodate the increased rate of runoff. .. Proposed Mitigation Measures: 3. Prior to approval of grading permits, the project proponent shall apply for.NPDES stormwater discharge permit that a plies to the grading of five or more acres of land, if it is deemed necessary. 4. . The culvert at the southern end of the project shall be cleaned of debris and sediment prior to commencement of the rainy season(November 1), and during the rainy season .(November to April 1) as. necessary.;. to maintain free-flowing conditions. To facilitate maintenance the culvert. shall be designed to Town standards. This shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. . The project grading plan shall include an.approved. drainage and erosion control plan to minimize the Impacts from erosion and "sedimentation. This plan shall conform to all standards adopted by the Town of Los Altos-Hills and Santa Clara County. The plan shall indude procedures such as: (a) restricting grading to the dry season; (b) protecting all finished graded slopes from erosion -using- such techniques as .hillslope benching, : erosion- control matting, hydroseeding; protecting downstream storm drainage inlets from sedimentation; (d) use ofsilt fencing to retain sediment on the project site;.and (e) any other suitable measures outlined in the Association of Bay Area Governments' (ABAG) Manual of Standards. The plans shall be sub initted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of.a grading permit. 6. "Prior to the,expiration of the warrafityall drainage culverts shall be inspected for accumulated sediment.: If sediment accumulationhas occurred, these drainage structures shall be cleared of debris and sediment by the Applicant. This shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7. The project, site drainage:shall use grass-lined ditches and.swales wherever practical. The drainage plan shall bliesubmitted to the City Engineer:for approval prior to issuance of a grading permit. 15 IV. Plant Life Plant life change in number Response to a): The west side of the pro•erty and a portion of the north boundary of the property contains stands of high qu.lity Oak woodlands which would be significantly effected if not set aside for preservation" by conservation easements or some other form of • protection. Individual tre: protection is inadequate to address the protection of these areas which are outlined to be preserved in the Town is General Plan. The Conceptual Development Plan shows t at five (5) 15" live oaks and three (3) 10" live oaks would be removed from Lot 1 and o e (1) 15" locust would be removed from Lot 2. The plan also indicates that building foo •rints may encroach upon tree driplines. Proposed Mitigation Measur:s: 8. Prior to subdivision improvements, the applicant shall submit to the Planning DirectoIr a plan for prtection of trees on-site during the construction and grading process. The plan sh.11 be approved by a certified arborist, and by the Town prior to issuance of any grding permits. 9. Areas of significant oak woodlands are to le protected by an established conservation easemen . The easement shall be extended to the dripline of the trees. The conservation easements shall be specified onl the subdivision map. 10. Prior to issuance of o ccupancy permits the applicant shall replace each Heritage Oak removed or dam:ged with five (5) 48-inch box'trees of the same species as the tree removed. Only ees indicated for removal on the approved Tentative Map (and subsequently " agged" in the field) shall be removed. The location of replacement trees shad 1 be approved by the Planning Director. A multi-year bond (2 to 5 years to be •etermined by the Town) shall be paid by the applicant to ensure maintenance .nd care for replacement trees. VIII. Land Use This development is propsed to relocate an existing 1.94 acre Conservation Easement by "shifting" it to the sou h. The new Conservation Easement would encompass 2.0 acres. Siting of the development circle for Lot 3 intrudes on the Human Habitation Setback Line (HHSBL). Proposed Mitigation Measur:s: 11. No construction activ'ties of any kind, including grading and excavation shall occur within the area desi: ated for the proposed conservation easement on Lots 1 and 2. This shall be de onstrated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permits. • _ r 12. No building or place ent of structure that humans will inhabit shall occur within the existing HHSBL. This shall be shown on a revised tentative map to the satisfaction of the Ci Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. 16 13. Only native landscaping is allowed in the conservation easement, as approved by. the Town. Only clearing of poison oak and fire clearing, as approved by the Town is allowed. This shall be indicated on landscape plans submitted for the subdivision and individual lot development (asapplicable), and approved by the Planning Director prior to approval of the Tentative Map. 14. No building or structure of any type is allowed in the conservation easement except lawful open-style fencing which does not hamper the movement of wildlife. This shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Planning Director prior to approval of the Tentative Map. 15. The final tract map shall note and the applicantshall dedicate a conservation/open space easement of equal public benefit as the easement being abandoned as may be determined by the City Council. 16. No construction activities of any kind,including grading and excavation shall occur within the area having a slope greater than 30 percent. This area should be considered a conservation easement and shall be indicated on the Tentative Map. Thisshall be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. 17 • • • • • • . • I . • • • • • • • • •. • • . • • • • . • • •• � • • Appendix. . MDA/MFA Worksheets V TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS • 26379 Fremont Road • Los Altos Hills,California 94022 • (415)941-7222 • FAX(415)941-3160 ' • PLANNING DEPARTMENT •,,WORKSHEET #1 CALCULATION OF AVERAGE:SLOPE;LOT UNIT FACTOR MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT AREA; AND MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA • TURN IN WITH,YOUR APPLICATION • PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME L EFEV R E • • PROPERTY ADDRESS ALT-rim 0-nr R 0 — f'i-RC.EL 1 • CALCULATED BY 4AliANDDATE 1. _CALCULATION OF AVERAGE SLOPE A. CONTOUR LENGTH WITHIN NET AREA OF:LOT:(An) • CONTOUR LENGTH CONTOUR LENGTH l CONTOUR LENGTH CONTOUR LENGTH (INCHES) (INCHES) f .: (INCHES) (INCHES) '765 0,. .� 5. 444 Ito ' - 115 1.`1 15,5 1.o - `7.u) 6,5 7(.00 7,15 5,(. .I• 75,5 5-2- 740 I 5-2- _ 55 ( A-cis 55 C .0563) _.i �-'56 ,00 3 S� ,o 0:�3 2.E9 TOTAL 3 Convert inches to feet (multiplyby map scale) _ (L) _ �'aa I-a L79. („2,0 / feet B. AVERAGE SLOPE WITHHLN NET AREA.OF LOT `S = (0.0023) (I) (L) I = contour-interval L= total length of An = net acreage An in feet contours in feet of lot S = (0.0023) ( 5 ) ( ). ( 1.3-b ) l�l .S; nearest 0.1% .2. CALCULATION OF LOT UNIT FACTOR (LUF} LUF = (An)(1 - [0.02143(S - 10)]) = /, 61 1:› If the averageslope is.less than 10%, the LUF for the lot is equal to the net area. E> If the LUFis equal to or less.than 0.50,:you will need a Conditional Development Permit. Make an appointment with'the Town Planner for :further information. _. TM314 - 11 . .5 Page 1 of 2 REVISED 12/09/91 [1.1P14. . 5 7'7 07 • LDJ: MAC HD/ORIGINALS/PLANNINC/Worksheet M1 • TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS . 26379 Fremont Road • Los Altos Hills,California 94022 • (415)941-7222 • FAX(415)941-3160 ' • PLANNING DEPARTMENT WORKSHEET#1 • 4LCULATIO OF AVERAGE SLOPE LOT LOT UNIT FACTOR MAXIMUM REVEL o PMENT AREA, AND MAXEMUM FLOOR AREA -' • RN IN WITH YOUR APPLICATION • .. PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME LaFEvRE • PROPERTY ADDRESS- A ,41OMIT Ro-O . - .P(J-( GEL. a, CALCULATED BY . 6 f t.'4 j: n t 4 . I<W I DATE I/_ ? - q,4 I 1. CALCULATION OF AVERAG: SLOPE A. CONTOUR LENGTH 'I NET AREA OF LOT (Art) CONTOUR LENGTH CONTO • LENGTH CONTOUR LENGTH CONTOUR LENGTH (INCHES) (INCHES) (INCHES) V (INCHES) 106 :11145 ?.D -fro q•A-1' 1 75a T.0 . -7rd el- o I -755 $.5 . • - 77-O $•'lI 7cco Lt. I . - . 7R5 8.45 7A .1-� . 73.5 S.51 '17- .3 .� 7�fo -(5 5' 55 ( 4s) 55 (. )Si, ) = ....24, TOTAL [Of . I - (00.131) (s .00 3 C 5) Convert inches to feet (multiply .y map scale) (L) = - 9 ' feet . _ . �o� + �`� - x-2,,3 B. AVERAGE SLOPE WITHLN NET AREA OF LOT - V S. = (0.0023) (I) (L) I = contour interval L= total length of An = net acreage An • feet contours in feet of lot S = (0.0023) ( 5 ) ( 44-293) = V , ( 2..55 ) Imo( • 14' • - nearest 0.1% 2. AL LATIN •F LOT IT A •R L 12 • LUF = (An)(1 - [0.02143(S - 10)11 = _.0 L4 . . . - E If the average s ope is less t an 10%,.the]LUF for the lot is equal to the net area. C> If the LUF is equal to or less han 0.50, you will need a Conditional Development Permit. Make an appointment with the Town Planner for further information. • " •• . !'h oma- -- 23, 09• Page 1 of 2 REVISED 12/09/91 : .f FA. - 1 I 3 21 I LDJ: MAC HD/ORICINALS/PLANNING/Worksheet K1 . • >TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS 26379 Fremont Road • Los Altos Hills,Califomia 94022 • (415)941-7222'• FAX(415)941-3160 • • PLANNING DEPARTMENT WORKSHEET #1 • CALCULATION OF'AVERGE'SLOPE, LOT UNIT FACTOR MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT A, AND FLOOR AREA • • TURN IN WITH YOUR:APPLICATION •.. . .. PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS AL-774-rncmT .. ROAD� � . PAiez_E:1_, 3 '_ CALCULATED BY CGI Vt,1 (an l 8r-_Kul-1 i _ DATE . - .,.- . 1. CALCULATION OF AVERAGE SLOPE A. CONTOUR LENGTH WITHIN NET AREA OF LOT (An) CONTOUR LENGTH . CONTOUR LENGTH CONTOUR LENGTH ' CONTOUR LENGTH (INCHES) - (INCHES) (INCHES).. (INCHES) (ag5 _ _ 6,0 -105 4.S TOTAL 14.2 . Convert inches to feet (multiply by map scale) (L) 5 G g feet B. AVERAGE SLOPE WITHIN NET AREA OF LOT =S = (0.0023) (I) (L) I = contour interval L= total length of An.. = net acreage An ' . ' in feet. contours in feet of lot S = (0.0023) ( 5 ) ( 56e. ) = ( 1.2.1 )' . . . _ 5 • Li- • nearest 0.1% 2. CALCULATION OF LOT UNIT FACTOR (LUF) LUF = (An)(1 - [0.02143(S - 10)1} [ 21 • E> If the.average slope is less than 10%,the LUF for the lot is equal to the net area. 1:::> If the LUF is equal to or less than 0.50; you will need a Conditional Development Permit. Make an appointment with the Town Planner for further information.` .. " . 1(?) 15D , Page 1 of 2 REVISED.12/09./91rY1 200 LDJ: MAC HD/ORIGINALS/PLANNING/Worksheet*1 s�� 7 TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS • 26379 Fremon.Road • Los Altos Hills,California 94022 • (415)941-7222 • FAX(415)941-3160. • J PLANNING DEPARTMENT WORKSHEET #1 CALCULATION OF AVERAGE SLOPE, LOT UNIT FACTOR MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT AREA, AND MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA • • TURN IN WITH YOUR APPLICATION • PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME EFEV PROPERTY ADDRESS Ac.,774 o Ii r 2 0 4-6 - PAR ce—L 4-1- CALCULATED BY - E I (AA ei ri I �. K1,01 DATE ti - g - �J 1. CALCULATION OF AVERAGE SLOPE • A. CONTOUR LENGTH WITHIN NET AREA OF LOT (An) CONTOUR T LENGTH CONTOUR LENGTH CONTOUR LENGTH CONTOUR LENGTH (INCHES - (INCHES) (INCHES) (INCHES) to5- o (o- 6 9-0 ! to-7 0 TOTAL `7 7. Convert inches to feet (multiply by map scale) = (L) = 3.9 o o feet B. AVERAGE SLOPE WITHIN NET AREA OF LOT - S = (0.0023) (I) (L) I = contour interval L= total length of An = net acreage, A n in feet contours in feet of lot S = (0.0023) ( ) ( D-0 ) = ( 3.83 ) • II. 1 nearest 0.1% 2. CALCULATION OF LOT UNIT FACTOR (LUF) . LUF = (An){1 - [0.02143(S - 10)1) = r 3 , (� b If the average slope is less than 10%, the LUF for the lot is equal to the net area. E> If the LUF is equal to or less than 0.50, you will need a Conditional Development Permit. Make an appointmentwith. the Town Planner for further information. rn1:4a = 52199B 8 Page 1 of 2 REVISED 12/09/91 LDJ: MAC HD/ORIGINALS/PLANNING/Worksheet Ml rn�� z1�8 W Lamm Cot--.fin 330 Village Lane ' <_ Los Gatos, California 65030 1' and Associates (408) 354-5542 September 21, 1994 L3164 • - k NI SID c TO: Linda S. Niles ' \994 Town Planner SEP TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS ‘kt-� 26379 Fremont Road S 0°S Los Altos Hills, California 94022 of LO SOWN SUBJECT: Geologic and Geotechnical Review RE: Lands of LeFevre 26410 Altamont Rd. 4-Lot Subdivision • At your request, we have completed a geologic.and geotechnical review of the subject property using: • Soil and Geologic Investigation (report) prepared by Terrasearch, dated June 10, 1981; • Soil and Geologic Investigation Update (letter) prepared by Terrasearch, dated November 18, 1988; • Supplemental Geologic Investigation prepared by Terrasearch, dated August 24 1992,and •` 'Tentative-Map, Conceptual evelopment Plans (4 sheets, 40- scale) prepared by Giuliani and Kull,dated March 31, 1992. In addition, w e comrleted recent siteand .7 7 t 'r'.. .,..av+C.�l.0 a r..�.�,a.t Sint reconnaissance, reviewed pertinent technical documents (L3192 and L3273) from our office files concerning the subject property. • DISCUSSION Our review of the referenced documents indicates that the applicant is proposing to subdivide a single parcel into four residential lots. The single parcel is Parcel C of a four parcel subdivision that was approved by our office in November, 1988. The subject property surrounds_an existing developed lot. Access .to thislot is provided by an ,_.... asphalt driveway that crosses proposed. lots 1, and 2. •An existing water tank and cottage are located on proposed Lot 2. Proposed lots 3 and 4 are undeveloped. Access to the four lots is to be provided by proposed Elizabeth Court, which extends from Altamont Road at the northern end of the property.. .-.- • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY • ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES • FOUNDATION ENGINEERING 4 idY%i JAt 160 Linda S. Niles September 21, 1994 Page 2 L3164 Under previous appli ations (November 1989 and August 1992), the subject property was proposed to be .ubdivided into six and five residential lots, respectively. In our review report dated A : t 27, 1992,we recommended approval of the Tentative Map for the proposed five-lo i subdivision. In October 1993, a subsequent application was submitted for a four-lot -ubdivision of the subject property. In our review report for this application, dated •ctober 11, 1993, we recommended that the applicant's geotechnical consultant revie the submitted Tentative Map to verify the location of the recommended Seismic setback zone. • I• • p _ •-►t D. D _c_ •, According to the 198 Soil and Geologic Investigation (report) completed by Terrasearch foil the original f.ur parcel subdivision (of:Which the subject property is Parcel C), a potentially activ trace of the Berrocal fault was identified and mapped through the property. The coy sultant recommended a 30-foot seismic setback zone on either side of t] e mapped surf:ce trace of the fault. This zone crosses through proposed Lots 3 and 4. hi August 199-, the consultant concluded that based on available data, the seismic ha and of surfac: fault rupture was negligible outside ofthe designated setback zone. . - Based on our review .fthe referenced documents, the recommended seismic setback zone appears to be accurately located on the submitted, Tentative Map. However, considering new -eismic data and heightened awareness regarding thrust faults, resulting from the rec nt Northridge earthquake (January 17, 1994), as well as research along Ithe thrust fau'its of the local peninsula, Terrasearch should review the proposed Tent tive Map an. verify that the recommended seismic setback zone is accurately depicted and still a.propriate at this site.,We recommend that the following condition be completed as a c.ndition of Tentative Map approval: 1. •i mi • . . •rifi . •.s -The applicant's geotechnical consultant should review t e current Tentative Map. Considering new seismic data resulting from t e recent Northridge earthquake,as well as recent studies of thrust faulti g along the local front range (Lettis, 1994), the consultant should evaluat:whether the depicted seism'c setback zone is accurately located and ap.ropriate.at this.site. ,, The results of t is seismic setback verification should be summarized in a letter by the con.ultant and submitted to the Town Engineer for review prior to grantin: Tentative Map approval. • Site .development pl.ns should .be approved by the Town Geotechnical. Consultant prior to issuance of grading and/or buildingpermits for individual lots. . William Cotton and Associates 41Yr4 Linda S. Niles September 21, 1994 Page 3 L3164 Respectfully submitted, WILLIAM COTTON AND ASSOCIATES,INC. TOWN GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT CjitAl°:)9\ j?-lfeAr Julia Branch Lopez Project Engineering Geologist (/l/Z4 (?.Ck(1.64_. William R. Cotton Principal Engineering Geologist CEG 882 WRC:TS:JL William Cotton and Associates Town of Los Altos Hills (V Pathways,Parks&Recreation Committee Les Earnest: 12769 Dianne Drive; Los Altos Hills, CA 94022 Phone: 415 941-3984 Fax: 415 94113934 Internet: Les@cs.stanford.edu 8/21/94 Ods � To: Planning Commission & City Engineer �' D • From: Les Earnest, Pathways Committee Chair qUG� v • et) 319 Subject: Pathway requests 9� The Pathway Committee makes the following recommendations. Lands of Noghrey; 27870 Fawn Creek Court: restore II-B path along Fawn Creek. • Lands of Chan; 14265 Berry Hill Court: no request. Bellucci Subdivision: in addition to previously specified native pathways parallel to Moody Road between the toe of the slope and Adobe Creek, and the pathways along Francemont Avenue and both sides of Adobe Creek Lodge Road, the degraded native path going from the end of Francemont diagonally uphill toward the West and connecting with a graded road in the open space easement should be regraded and the graded road in the open space should be made a part of the pathway system. There should also be a II-B path with switchbacks constructed from the West lobe at the end of Adobe Creek Lodge Road going uphill to connect with the graded road. Lefevre (former Eschner) Subdivision: request II-B pathway on top of the bank along Altamont; along either side of Elizabeth Court (don't care which side); and along the southern boundary of Lot 2 from Silent Hills Lane to the pathway leading to Julietta Lane. Also grade a 10 foot native path along the Southwestern edge of Lot 4. Note: where construction or upgrading of paths to the II-B standard is } recommended, this is to include irrigltion at least 5 feet away from path and a non-slip surface on any crossing driveways: Where there is "no request" we recommend that in lieu fees be collected where possible. A` CITY OF LOS ALTOS . To OS �o FIRE DEPARTMENT 10 Almond Avenue • ,e►ribo" Los Altos, California 94022-2201 • �.� • 9F Q�t► (415) 948-2404 �� . SIwow- August 18, 1994 • RECEIVED AUG 2.3 1994 Mr. Jeff Peterson Town of Los Altos Hills TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILL. 26379 Fremont Road Los Altos Hills, CA 94022 RE: T/M Lands of LeFevre Elizabeth Ct . at Altamont Road Dear Mr. Peterson: The Los Altos Fire Department approves the above subject to the following condition: Install one fire hydrant at a location specified by the Fire Dept . The hydrant shall be installed and ready for use prior to the issuance of any build ng permits . Sincerely, ,.j>1LL //Stuart Farwell Los Altos Fire Dept . RESPONSIVE-INNOVATIVE-CONCERNED Evh iu4s ' THOITS. LOVE. HERSH8ERCER b{ Mr:LEAN A PROIC$RIONAL CORPORATION DIANA•ewgwAut3EN ATTORNEYS AT LAW TCRRCNCC w.CVNNCR Safi UNIVLMLLTY AVCNut. SUM !ROQ STCfNICN A.°woes aTLrAcr.C.oremosN 'ALO ALTO,OALIFOI►NIA 114301 J,wowALDMeAssecnaCa 'COL[PMN{t 141¢1 3tf.gtoO Tr+GNA,a.JACOO rAC�IMIty�(A 1 1 GCRAt;o..,1.AITCNEN O v7 is-558 r• . WILLIAM J.NOLGN - roMN C.LCMMAN IMUCC H.MUMRO PAW.C.RICE r---- WARR6N R.THOITG O.COUN�iL WILLIAM s.LOVR JUDY ROOMS SACTN JAMCi R.IARNCTT RICNARO LC14 MAN E.DAVID MAR14Q wALTER T.MOCIRC JCAMNt GRACE RORCIv'i Lo JCrtecvA.SNTDCA October 27., 1994 YTh pm0$I fII,3�! (41 1 963 €4 . Harry I. Price, Esq. Reynolds, Roux, Price & Cases 5160 El Camino Real, Suite C-21 • Los Altos, CA 94022-1527 Re: Cleary v. Phelps, LeFevre,-et al. Dear Harry: This will confirm that our .clients have agreed to settle the above referenced matter fot the following: . a.. Mr. LeFevre shall construct 100% of Silent Hi1la Lane at his sole cost 2. Dr. Cleary .shah. be .responsiblefor constructing the driveway from Silent Hilla Lane as it enters his property to his home at his ''sole cost; 3. Upon ,completion of Silent Hills Lane, and certification by the Town of Los Altai Hills that Silent Hills Lane is usable, Dr. Cleary shall use Silent Hills Lane as the sole access to his property and shall agree that he has no rights to the use Of the existing driveway as set. forth in the 1964 easement; 4 . Mr. LeFevre shall be responsible for the relocation of any and all utilities, , telephone, water, sewer, etc. as necessary to Dr. Cleary's property pursuant to the „ Subdivision Agreement .with Los Altos Hills; • '5. Dr. Cleary shall be responsible for the relocation of any and all .utilities aa' set . forth in the proceeding paragraph from the end of Silent Hills Lane or elsewhere on Dr. Cleary's property; 6. Dr. Cleary and Mr. LeFevre shall execute any necessary three-way .maintenance agreement for Silent Hills Lane A:\C2406.00t(2)0RICR.L10 October 21, 1994 ... �.rs • Harry I. P ice, Esq. October 21, 1994 Page 2 such that P-rcela 1, 2 and 3, as sat forth on the 1991 Map, shall each be responsible for 1/3 of the maintenance o!f Silent H lie Lane: 7. All the obl. gations of this 1 tter shall run with the owner of the different properties bound by this agreement and the nee esary documents shall be recorded to bind said proper.yt S. A . Cleary -y take the gate and brick pillars which are presently 1•cated at the Altamont entrance to the e cissting dr veway and move them to the point at which Silent Hills Lane enters. his property at the sole cost of Dr. Cleary ubject to the approval of Los Altos Hills; 9. All parties shall waive costs and fees in this matter; ald 10. All parties -grebe to execute all .necessary documents to effectuate is settlement, incliuding a formal settlement agreement. It is understood that Dr. Cleary is mak ng no representation of . what actions ha might •ake in regard to arty subdivision efforts by !Cr. LeFevre. This set lament shall not in any way impact any other issues or p tential ob igations between the parties other than the quiet title action whi h is presently filed in Santa Clara County . and -the obl gation to onstruct Silent Hills Lane. Ifthislet er conform-: with your understanding of the agreement, please have our clien execute a copy of this agreement and return it to me. will also obtain a signature from my client. Thank you for your processional courtesy and cooperation in this regard. - very truly yours, //;;;. avi Ma: s for ;77. Thoits, Love, Hershber•er ,& McLean I have read and . agree to the settlement VV of the above referenced action base- on the terms set forth in this letter. • Date: bctober , 1994 (51 Iii OV\ 8,t� sP , Gary W. Cleary ��e ..1, . ...2ipsijuto • Data; October 41., 1994 :' Thomas L.Fevre ' A,144O4.0O1(2)\PRcct.l10 October 21. 1994 _77.____________ 464...........,.., ,___ _ ...__ __.. ___ .. , • L. 688PAGE 13t� 9 1078534 , . . . 1 . PII.tU FUh ht::UNI) 4 AT REQUEST OF LOS ALTOS ifs • This Document is Recorded. For the Benefit of the QPR.25 52 X91 ... • Town of Los .Altos, Hills Y - • OFFICIAL RECORDS . • And is Exempt from -Fee .. _ SANTA U4RA COUNTY Per Government Code , - • . ._, .. • L A I t i r. K n N E Sections ,6103 and '27383 - � - • RECGRUFR When Recorded, Mail to: • APR-2-5 1991. t) Town of Los Altos Hills / 26379 Fremont Road Los Altos Hills, CA 94022 Attention: • City Clerk RESOLUTION NO.. 13-91 . 1(' . A-RESOLUTION OP N FEE • THE CITY COUNCIL OF � THE TOWN-OP LOS ALTOS HILLS ACCEPTING CONSERVATION EASEMENT ON TRACT NO. 4897 WHEREAS, on October 5, 1970, the Town required, as a condition to approval of a tentative subdivision map of fourteen (14) lots, that the subdivider dedicate the development rights. to 2..3 acres lying between the Eshner homesite and Altamont Road, or dedicate it to the Town as Open Space; and WHEREAS, in order to tulfill. this condition, the final map • for Tract No. 4897 ("Map") designated a Conservation Easement reserved for preservation, of view and slope control purposes.;._.and• - WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Map on August 16, 1971- and it. was recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Santa Clara County on August 20, 1971; and WHEREAS, the Certificate of the City Clerk on the Map indicates that the Town rejected all parcels of land shown on the • Map which were offered for dedication to public use in conformity with .the ._terms of the dedication offer; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk's Certificate leaves some doubt as to whether the Conservation Easement was rejected by the Town; and WHEREAS, the Town wishes formally to accept..the Conservation Easement noted on the Map on behalf of the public; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills does RESOLVE as follows: L ----, _ _ ._. . , . _ , . 411 + 688P.1350 Section 1. The reject on, if any, of the Conservation Easement of approicimately 1.99 acres designated on the Final i Subdivision Map for Tract N. . 4897, which Map was recorded on +. August 20, 1971 at Book 288 pages 42 and 43 in the Office of the County Recorder o Santa Cl.ra County is hereby rescinded, and said ConservationEasement s hereby accepted b, the City Council on behalf of the esidents .f Tract No. 4897 and the public. Section 2. he City C erk is hereby directed to cause a certified copy of this reso ution to be recorded in the Office of the County Record r of Sant. Clara County. REGULARLY PA SED AND . • 'OPTED this 3rd day of , `April , 1991. By: G1/.t.�4:e..,,,.• /n . Mayor a. ATTEST: , 7 A44f-tD e' +0.....:---- City Cl k r PBVMASX1494906J.W50 2 •'i .e L 688E 135 L STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) On this 9t h day of April 19 91 , before me, a Notary Public in and for the County of Santa Clara, State of California, personally appeared William M. Siegel and Patricia Dowd , known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk; respectively, of the City of State of California, and known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on' behalf of the Municipal Corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that such Municipal Corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to a Resolution of its City Council. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,` I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this Certificate first above written. =' OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Pub c in and for I CAROL J.HARRISON i the County( of Santa Clara '=8 NOTARY PUBLIC•CAUFORNu State of California ' kW. 3 SANTA Colros U. - t M Comm.Expires Feb.2,1994 1 My commission expires: 2-2-94 (SEAL) • • , I P • RECEIVED Dr. and Mrs. Gary W. Cleary 26410 Altamont Road Los Altos. Hills, CA 94022 TOWN OF LOS ALTOS`ILLS AUG - 3 9998 August 3, 1995 Ms. Suzanne Davis, Planner Los Altos Hills Planning Department 26379 Fremont Road Los Altos Hills, CA 94022 . Dear Ms. Davis: My wife and I live in the center of the proposed LeFevre Subdivision that is totally surrounded by land owned by Mr. LeFevre. The area has been commonly known in the past as "The Eshner Estate". Attempts to subdivide the land since 1990 has had no representation from anyone living here until now. We have lived here for 2 plus years and would I'ke to share our experiences, concerns and observations with you,. The purpose of my letter,is to ask you, the Planning Commission of.Los.,Altos Hills, to carefully consider the proposed LeFevre Subdivision, and to withhold the • necessary permits to allow this development project to begin, as the project appears to violate certain town resolutions, recordings and principles as well as conflicts with documented Town Hall records. There are four major issues that I would like to bring to your attention: 1. There is an existing quiet title action between Mr. LeFevre and us over our current driveway. The current subdivision map does not show our driveway and the issue still remains unsettled in the court. The subdivision should not move forward until the issue is settled. 2. The current conservation easement to the east of us should not be shifted but left as it was intended by the Town Hall. The citizens of Los Altos Hills would also be giving up land that has been made a conservation easement in trade for land that already is essentially a conservation easement. 3. The proposed "Elizabeth Court" does not address certain safety issues which either was mentioned or was not taken into consideration in the previous draft EIRs. Earlier documentation needs to be revisited. • '4. Oak trees on the hill west of us were left off of the map and need to be considered before chopping them down as proposed by the subdivider. This impacts on the preservation of oak trees in the environment. page 2 We have spoken to Mr. Cu is Williams and Ms. Suzanne Davis in the Town , Planning Department about these concerns and they said they would be taking these concerns in considerate.n in their report to you. I will go into more detail with these and other issues at the hearing on August 9. Nobuko and I look forward to meeting you and having the opportunity to address our concerns on Aug st 9. Sind • \Vili Gary . Cleary cc: Town of Los Altos Hills Pla ning Commission Mr. Curtis Williams Ms. Suzanne Davis