Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFebruary 26 2018LOS ALTOS HILLS PATHWAYS COMMITTEE Minutes of Meeting on Monday February 26, 2018 Scribe: Alisa Bredo 1. Call to Order (roll call) a. PWC Chair called the meeting to order at: 7:01pm Council Liaison(s) present: Roger Spreen (until 9:22) Other City Council Members Present: None Town Staff Carl Cahill, City Manager Allen Chen, Public Works Director/City Engineer Jeremy Koch, Assistant Engineer Public Works Dept. Marni Moseley, Sr. Planner Other: Members of the public Present: Kjell Karlsson, Carol Gottlieb, Nancy Couperus, Vic Hesterman b. Approval of Agenda [not on agenda but standard agenda topic] I. A few amendments were suggested: moving the presentations from the floor to earlier in the meeting, updating the next Pathway Walk Date to March 24 and the next PWC meeting to March 26. PWC Chair noted that published agenda did not match most recent agen da, and not all properties for review were included. ND moved to approve as amended, SW seconded, and the vote was unanimously in favor (AB, ND, AD, MD, BE, VM, RM, BM, JN, SW, DW). Members Associates Alisa Bredo (AB) Nick Dunckel (ND) Ann Duwe (AD) Melissa Dyrdahl (MD) Bob Elson (BE) Val Metcalfe (VM) Rachelle Mirkin (RM) Bridget Morgan (BM) Judy Nagy (JN) Sonja Wilkerson (SW) Denise Williams (DW) Susan Cretekos (SC) Eileen Gibbons (EG) Bob Stutz (BS) LOS ALTOS HILLS PATHWAYS COMMITTEE Minutes of Meeting on Monday February 26, 2018 Scribe: Alisa Bredo 2. Approval of Minutes from Jan 22, 2018 PWC Meeting a. Minutes from January 2018 PWC Meeting were sent out for review 1hr prior to Feb. PWC meeting. JN moved to defer approval of January minutes until March PWC Meeting. AD seconded, and the vote was unanimously in favor (AB, ND, AD, MD, BE, VM, RM, BM, JN, SW, DW). b. Ex parte communications [not on agenda but standard Agenda topic] I. PWC Mapping Subcommittee met with Town Sr. Planner to discuss GIS map, and divided up segments of town for individual PWC members to verify. 3. New Topics & Announcements a. Staff and Town Updates I. 28555 Matadero Creek Maintenance issue – gate and netting impeding the path that previously connected Country Way and Stegner Path, which is now overgrown. Town Staff is working with Planning Department to confirm existing easement for the segment of the path on Water District land. The rest of the route has confirmed easements in place. Once confirmed, Town Maintenance Crew will clean up this pathway, likely in early Spring. Allen will check with Erin to confirm. II. PWC Role when property involves water district or fence easements PWC discussed PWC role with regard to fence permit applications that encroach on paths on approved maps (but not yet established) pathways. Fencing permit requests sometimes arise on properties where there are potential pathways but the property does not meet criteria for pathway review. PWC discussed whether there is a way to protect community paths of long standing while waiting to acquire easements before they can be made official paths (e.g. La Rena to W. Sunset which has been walked by neighbors for many decades but over time fences have been installed over that route). In one case the property owner agreed to move the fence back 5’ from the property line and to remove 3 trees. A recent house fire on La Rena raised the issue because neighbors contacted PWC, concerned because of the need for pathways to allow emergency exits (and access) in case of fire. Property owners are currently informed that they cannot build anything on areas where there are potential paths. Planning Department currently reviews fence permits, may be possible to add to requirements though this would likely require code change. PWC could attend site development meetings to LOS ALTOS HILLS PATHWAYS COMMITTEE Minutes of Meeting on Monday February 26, 2018 Scribe: Alisa Bredo communicate potential easement desires directly to homeowner. PWC agreed that PWC should have representation at meetings for properties where there are potential paths. Open Space Committee recently asked Town Clerk to send fence permit requests for review/awareness. Permit requests can feed into Planning Commission as well. Per current regulations easements may not be fenced, even if a pathway connection is not made. Environmental Design Committee also inspects all properties that are 900 square feet or more. PWC decided to add this topic to future PWC meeting agenda and continue discussion. AD will work with PWC Chair to research in preparation for future discussion. III. Process for Subdivisions (Definition of ‘Difficult’ Lot) Per current guidance, Town Staff can ensure that PWC review of properties requesting subdivision is not skipped. ‘Difficult lot’ may mean crossing swales or creeks, significant elevation drops, strange shaped lots, etc. Town Staff will work closely with PWC in future for these lots. Topography and shape will determine whether lots are determined to be ‘difficult’ or not. Subdivisions currently require more extensive review than typical lots. This more extensive review will be considered for individual difficult lots and subdivisions. For subdivisions, property owner must work with PWC to design pathway as part of the agreement with the town to accept the subdivision. PWC noted that subdivisions often have some easy and some difficult lots. PWC Chair will take this topic offline to make sure PWC has an understanding of where in the process the ‘difficult lot’ determination is made, and whether the trigger for more extensive review is due to the ‘difficult’ designation or the subdivision process. Carol Gottlieb noted that a new subdivision ordinance was passed recently by the Planning Commission and the LAH City Council to ensure that the Planning Commission, Open Space, and Environmental Design committees will all be involved to attend subdivision meetings to plan routes. The ordinance was revised last January. PWC Chair also agreed to add a discussion of potential improvements to process resulting from Ursula Ln. lessons learned to future PWC meeting agenda. IV. Native Path Specifications ND presented slides and handout [Attachment A – ND to send] for suggested native path specifications, and confirmed that references to ‘slope’ on the handout were to longitudinal slope, not cross slope, unless otherwise noted. Retaining wall specifications were also included. PWC discussed the proposed suggestions and noted that it may be necessary to add a caveat noting that specifications are open to modifications according to specific situations and existing ground conditions. As an LOS ALTOS HILLS PATHWAYS COMMITTEE Minutes of Meeting on Monday February 26, 2018 Scribe: Alisa Bredo example, the hill path connecting Stegner to Matadero Creek has >40% grade, which per proposed specs would require stairs, but the path is holding up well as a native path without even any running boards. One suggestion was made to add that native path specifications are preferred but additional options are possible based on conditions of land. An alternative suggestion was to note that ‘if native path doesn’t hold up for use (per town/pathway users), then the standards for native paths are employed’, to allow paths on natural slopes to continue to be implemented without unnecessary cost or infrastructure. An additional suggestion was to add a note stating that sand or gravel may be added to native paths as appropriate to maintain usability of the path. ND will update Native Path Specifications draft for PWC review at next PWC meeting. V. PWC update to Town Council PWC Chair noted that the annual PWC update is currently scheduled for June 2018 VI. Town Updates: a) Bob Stutz connector – discussed in Section 5b b) Garner Bullis path –discussed in Section 5c c) Page Mill Pedestrian Bridge near Moon Ln. Town signed Streamline Alteration Agreement with California Fish and Wildlife, which is required for the proposed bridge. d) Finance clarification from Pak Lin (follow-up from prior PWC meeting) Priority list with descriptions and estimated cost are needed b. GIS Pathways Mapping I. PWC subcommittee must be 5 or fewer members to be in compliance with the Brown Act. The GIS Mapping Subcommittee (a combination of the subcommittee noted in the January 2018 meeting and a subcommittee assigned in 2017) included 6 PWC members and 1 associate member. Only 5 PWC members were able to attend the meeting so there was not a quorum. PW Chair drew one name out of a hat for removal. VM volunteered to recuse herself from subcommittee and will not participate in subcommittee meetings but will continue walking paths as trainee. II. PWC Mapping Subcommittee met with Town Sr. Planner and separated town map into sections. Each PWC representative will review a section by walking the pathways to confirm and update the status of the paths. Sr. Planner provided database info re: segment numbers. Many errors were noted with the current draft. Per meeting, PWC representatives should document what is on the ground (e.g. dirt, gravel, IIB) but note maintenance issues via LAH Connect app. PWC noted that it would be LOS ALTOS HILLS PATHWAYS COMMITTEE Minutes of Meeting on Monday February 26, 2018 Scribe: Alisa Bredo helpful to have the path installation date/builder update date in the GIS system moving forward in order to keep track of how it has held up. Per meeting, Planning Department did not want to include maintenance because it changes so frequently. ND suggested that PWC also document condition while walking paths, and volunteered to process the information so that PWC could have data on condition of pathways throughout town. ND agreed to bring the two above recommendations to the Sr. Planner. III. Process for annexed areas, fire roads, emergency access easements, water district easements. Not yet reviewed in subcommittee since GIS layer does not yet include easements. Roger Spreen spoke with City Manager to prioritize addition of easement layer to GIS map. 4. New Properties for Review a. New Residence at 25700 Bassett Ln Parcel 2 APN 336-43-013 Lands of Yiu Path was staked out for full committee to review updated location. Proposed path connects several pathways. PWC noted that process went very smoothly with subcommittee and meeting with engineers, and staking was very helpful. Proposed path was acceptable to PWC Subcommittee members. PWC Subcommittee had one suggestion for staking: in original staking property line was marked with ‘path’, which was somewhat confusing. b. Second Unit at 28550 Matadero Creek This property was reviewed previously by PWC, and prior recommendation stands (in lieu fee). I. Side note: PWC noted the need for a volunteer to complete forms with recommendations from PWC to City Clerk cc Jeremy Koch (Assistant Engineer). Form includes file Number, address, and recommendation by PWC. Can be electronic or handwritten. DW agreed to complete this until her term ends in June. c. Town Council Meeting Debrief AD attended first half hour of goal setting session and requested approval of MPP update. Council Member Spreen will meet with Planning Director to discuss how to move forward with MPP update. d. Education Committee and PWC meeting Debrief Joint meeting is still to be scheduled e. IIB and Native Path Specifications See section 3.a)IV above. 5. Continuing Business: Budget and Connectors (timeline, asks…) RM, BE a. Budget review and timeline PWC Chair and BE are currently working on a process for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 priorities and presented on their plans, which included: LOS ALTOS HILLS PATHWAYS COMMITTEE Minutes of Meeting on Monday February 26, 2018 Scribe: Alisa Bredo I. Process for recommendations to Town Council for projects. PWC noted that there is a designated fund for in lieu fees, but restricted for pathway construction projects and GIS process and salaries of staff working on pathway projects. Fund balances were shared for 2015-2018. BM noted that fund is also used for projects in support of pathways, such as GIS system. RM shared Pathways Criteria (Attachment B) II. By late March finance would like info on projects, including project name, planned start date, end date, project description, status, cost estimate, recurring annual maintenance and operating costs III. Master list of possible projects shared by BE (Attachment C) IV. Proposed process: a) Put together package for each project b) Annually submit prioritized list of packages [this is proposed new step] c) PWC discussed how to prioritize projects, including suggestions for intensive rebuild path projects to be called out and prioritized as well, and for 2-sided road list to be considered for prioritization. d) BE shared Pathway Projects[Attachment D] to move from ideas to prioritized List for Town Council Budgeting e) BE shared Pathway Projects (Descriptions) [Attachment E needed, BE to send] and walked PWC through them. High level summaries of projects to present to Town Council. Costing would be an estimate initially; Town Engineering will go through proposal after submission to build out full costs. The presentation is intended to document rationale behind PWC prioritization for City Council (e.g. school route, safety concern, neighborhood support, relative cost). f) RM passed out additional handout [Attachment F Manuela- Fremont-Miranda-Estacada, RM to send] g) Executive summary and PWC prioritization to be shared at March City Council meeting. b. Bob Stutz Connector Public Works Director noted that input from PWC is needed for recommendation on Bob Stutz connector. Currently it was sent out for bids, and had responses. The current bid for a IIB path is $300k. PWC members suggested that a native path would be significantly cheaper. In order to pursue a native path instead of the original project, PWC would need to vote to reject the current bid and then LOS ALTOS HILLS PATHWAYS COMMITTEE Minutes of Meeting on Monday February 26, 2018 Scribe: Alisa Bredo pass another motion to approve a native path instead. MD moved that PWC reject current bid for Bob Stutz connector. BM seconded. The motion passed unanimously (AB, ND, AD, MD, BE, VM, RM, BM, JN, SW, DW). MD then moved that PWC make Bob Stutz connector a native path. DW seconded, and the second motion also passed unanimously (AB, ND, AD, MD, BE, VM, RM, BM, JN, SW, DW). c. Others: Gardiner Bullis frontage path: Allen, Summerhill: BE, Page Mill/Altamont: Denise, Redwood Grove: Ann, Bob I. LAH Town Attorney accepted the latest language for the proposed license agreement with Gardiner Bullis School. One additional sentence is being added, and if both sides are still in agreement it will be executed. The proposed path would go through the landscaped road right of way in front of Bullis School along the Fremont Rd. frontage. It would total roughly 200 feet, extending from Freemont Pines. Agreement is at Council level already. PWC discussed whether to add this project to the summary slides to present to City Council or to keep as a separate project. d. Prioritization Voting Sheets After some discussion of splitting the Summerhill project into two parts due to the high cost, PWC voted on prioritization of reviewed projects. I. PWC funding would cover most suggested projects II. Town Staff may also be limited with regard to building, so prioritization will be helpful to allocate resources. III. PWC completed voting sheets. Bob Stutz, half of Summerhill, Fremont Rd, Estacada, and Altamont Plunge were ranked by priority as an outcome of the vote (listed in order of rank) [Attachment G]. 6. Presentations from the Floor [Discussed after 2.] Carol Gottlieb (History Committee) noted that the History Committee is leading a walk and would like participation from PWC. The walk will be Monday Mar 26th at 9:30am, and the History Committee will seek permission from Fremont hills to go into stable area (historic area) and barns. SW agreed to help organize. Carol Gottlieb will notify the Town Crier under dates, and has route set. AD will join to represent PWC. PWC discussed additional potential dates for future walks, including the Town Picnic (June 3) or summer solstice (June 24), and the opportunity to send invitation to new residents for the walk. 7. Open Discussion: a. Marketing I. Town Crier LOS ALTOS HILLS PATHWAYS COMMITTEE Minutes of Meeting on Monday February 26, 2018 Scribe: Alisa Bredo SW sent message to Town Crier on PWC Activities asking about deadlines, article length, but no response yet. Theme of article would be new PWC process. II. Our Town Newsletter Article MD spoke to Public Works Director who confirmed 3 month lead time to get article in Our Town Newsletter. PWC did an article for the newsletter previously (roughly 2016). PWC discussed adding an explanation of the new process for CIP projects for awareness and to encourage readers to contact PWC for high priority pathway needs, and also noted that the proposed Redwood Grove path connecting LAH with Los Altos would be a good example. Next Newsletter date is July 1, then Oct. 1. III. Opportunities for additional walks: PWC discussed desired frequency. Previously there was a monthly Pathways Walk, but too many may dilute participation. New Year’s walk was a success, and some PWC members have had requests for more walks. PWC discussed potentially having a second one in summer, but not overlapping with/too close to Pathways Run. Summer Solstice suggestion is a Sunday 6/24. Heat also a consideration. PWC plans to connect with Parks & Recreation to coordinate dates. IV. Opportunities for PWC presence/tables: History Walk (March), Earth Day (Apr 15), Pathways Run (May 5), Town Picnic, Hoedown. SW will bring calendar to next meeting to document event dates and volunteers. V. Map Send-out to Residents Topic did not get on Town Council Agenda last time but will be on the next one on Mar.22. Scott Vanderlip will represent Parks & Recreation Committee. ND will represent PWC for map send-out at the March 22 City Council meeting. b. Pathway prioritization PWC Chair clarified that PWC budgetrecommendation will go to Pak end of March. 8. Next pathway walk: March 24, 2018 Next pathway meeting: March 26, 2018 9. Review and Request March Agenda Topics a. Next meeting will have continuation discussion regarding naming of pathway. RM will research background prior to meeting to understand precedent for this. 10. Adjournment Meeting was adjourned at 9:48pm Pathway Projects Move from Ideas to Prioritized List for TC Budgeting Presentation to the PWC February 26, 2018 Bob Elson 2/26/18 THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Master List of Projects & PWC member ownership (page 1 of 5) Item #Proposed Project Project Type Description Rationale Proposed by Data Work-up by 1 Summerhill Avenue Roadside Pathway Install continuous IIB roadside path on south side of Summerhill from El Monte to Magdalena • Major road with heavy auto, bike, and pedestrian traffic • Creates loop in area with few paths • Recommended by LAH Education Committee RM, AD, SW, ND BE, SW 2 Fremont Road from Town Hall to Arastradero Road Roadside Pathway Install continuous IIB roadside path along Fremont • Major road with heavy auto, bike, and pedestrian traffic; designated for paths on both sides; • Route to school proposed by Education Committee • Design study completed in 2005 as part of Fremont SRTS project BM, JN SC 3 Page Mill south of Lupine to the off road past West of Country Way Roadside Pathway Improve roadside path on east side of Page Mill Road from 13830 Page Mill (Moon Lane) to 13240 Page Mill • Narrow path adjacent to pavement with many obstacles dangerous for path users • Narrow path adjacent to pavement with many obstacles dangerous for path users • Roadside “path” gets heavy use AB AB, MD 4 Summit Wood Road Curve Roadside Pathway Install roadside path from 25552 Summit Wood to 25031 Summit Wood • Narrow road with significant bike and pedestrian traffic and no shoulder • Connects Rhus Ridge to Mary Stutz path and Prospect Avenue • One of few connections to Juan Prado Mesa Open Space Preserve AB 3/26/2018 Master List of Projects & PWC member ownership (page 2 of 5) Item #Proposed Project Project Type Description Rationale Proposed by Data Work-up by 5 Natoma Road at intersection with Elena Roadside Pathway Extend roadside path to corner to provide a safe crossing point at stop sign on Elena; continue path on bank or add retaining wall adjacent to road • Intersection of two roads with significant auto, bike, pedestrian, and equestrian traffic • Cars take turn to Natoma at speed with limited visibility around corner • Current path requires crossing Natoma just before intersection, blind to cars coming up Elena AB 6 Altamont Plunge Roadside Pathway Provide safe descent to street level from roadside path on adjacent parcel and off-road path from Vinedo Lane • Major road with heavy auto, bike, and pedestrian traffic. Cars and bikes are speeding downhill at this location. • Dangerous steep drop-off from connecting pathways to road DW, SW DW 7 Altamont from Eshner to Silent Hills Upgrade Roadside Pathway Restore degraded roadside IIB path • Major road with heavy auto, bike, and pedestrian and equestrian traffic. Poor sight distance for drivers at this long blind curve. • Close to open space and stables at Westwind Community Barn DW 8 Arastradero from Fremont to Mandoli Roadside Pathway Install IIB roadside path in ROW on LAH side of Arastradero • Major road with extraordinarily heavy auto, bike, and pedestrian traffic. • Paved shoulder is busy bikeway • LAH side of Arastradero has synagogue and new bus stop • Pedestrian traffic includes many employees from business parks walking or jogging SW SW 9 Page Mill-Moon Lane Safety Improvement Roadside Pathway Create roadside route along east side of Matadero Creek • Unsafe road crossing at Moon Lane and Paseo del Robles • Proposed plan using bridge is expensive and less safe than AD AD, ND 3/26/2018 Master List of Projects & PWC member ownership (page 3 of 5) Item #Proposed Project Project Type Description Rationale Proposed by Data Work-up by 10 Robleda Road from Beatrice to Fremont Roadside Pathway Repair degrading roadside path and install safety rail between narrow path and creek • Dangerous drop-off into creek from narrow path adjacent to pavement AD 11 La Barranca Upgrade Roadside Pathway Remove narrow degraded asphalt and install IIB roadside path • Major connecting route across I-280 for autos, bikes, pedestrians • Path does not meet IIB standards (4 ft wide; asphalt unsafe for horses) • Close to stables, country club, Purissima Park SW SW 12 La Paloma Missing Links Roadside Missing Segments Complete missing segments on both sides or on Gardner Bullis side only. (East side has 1 missing segment; west side has 8.) • Heavily walked streets without continuous paths • Completes major loop: La Paloma-Purissima-Concepcion-Fremont • Route to school recommended by Education Committee BE, BM, JN 13 Concepcion Missing Links Roadside Missing Segments Install IIB roadside path on five missing segments on east side of Concepcion • Heavily walked streets without continuous paths • Completes major loop: La Paloma-Purissima-Concepcion-Fremont BE 14 Gardner Bullis Fremont Frontage Roadside Missing Segments Install IIB roadside path across frontage • Route to school recommended by Education Committee BM, JN 3/26/2018 Master List of Projects & PWC member ownership (page 4 of 5) Item #Proposed Project Project Type Description Rationale Proposed by Data Work-up by 15 Estacada Way Roadside Missing Segments Install IIB path on single parcel on west side of Estacada • Completes Manuela-Fremont-Miranda loop • Route to school recommended by Education Committee BE, BM, JN 16 Magdalena Road Missing Links Roadside Missing Segments Complete missing segments on Magdalena • Winding road with poor sight-distance in many locations • Narrow or no shoulders force pedestrians into street • Connecting route to Rancho San Antonio Preserve • Recommended by Education Committee AB 17 Hilltop to Dawnridge Off-Road Path Construct native off-road path connecting east end of Hilltop Road to west end of Dawnridge • Off-road path on 2005 Council-approved Master Path Plan • Completes two different loop routes in this area of Town RM RM 18 Almaden to Lucero Off-Road Path Re-open native off-road; confirm easement on 26776 Almaden Court • Connects Altamont to Natoma and creates a loop route AD 19 Matadero Creek to Via Ventana Off-Road Path Re-route and/or repair off-road path between Via Ventana and Matadero Creek Lane?ANN please fill in this ND, AD 20 Todd Lane to Orchard Hill Upgrade Off-Road Path Upgrade steep off-road path behind Gardner Bullis School (e.g., with stairs) • Steep path, wet in rainy season • Route to school proposed by Education Committee BM, JN BM, JN 3/26/2018 Master List of Projects & PWC member ownership (page 5 of 5) Item #Proposed Project Project Type Description Rationale Proposed by Data Work-up by 21 Fremont Road to Redwood Grove Off-Road Path Work with Los Altos to upgrade steep path in Redwood Grove • Will provide access to park from LAH neighborhoods • Well-used, but treacherously steep path already exists AD AD,BE 22 Page Mill Road to Saddle Mountain Off-Road Path Mow and define native off-road path from Page Mill to Town open space and Saddle Mountain Court; add signage • Off-road loop route needs signage and maintenance to keep users on track • Completes multiple different loop routes in this area of Town BE 23 Altamont-Moody Swamp Maintenance Upgrade off-road path between 25670 that is wet and impossible MAINTENANCE?DW 24 Altamont-Vinedo Swamp Maintenance Upgrade off-road path between 25670 that is wet and impossible MAINTENANCE?DW 25 Westwind Community Barn and Byrne Preserve Maintenance Improve surface on path along Moody Creek between WWCB and Central Drive MAINTENANCE?ND 26 Byrne Preserve Maintenance Improve surface on off-road path along Moody Creek LOCATION?MAINTENANCE?ND 3/26/2018 Projects that are Currently Funded by TC 3/26/2018 Pathway Prioritization Process 1. Maintain Master List of Possible Projects 2. For each project, create a “Budget Ready” information package 3. (Annually) Submit prioritized list of packages •Produce “Preliminary Project Info Package” •Share information with PWC •Work with Town Mgr & Staff to engage neighbors •Finalize Package for PWC approval •Review budget & current project status •Discuss and vote on prioritization •Submit ordered budget ready list to Staff Bob Elson 2/26/18 Possible Priority Criteria 1)Safe route to school 2)Safety (dangerous intersection, blind curve, drop-offs, etc) 3)Neighborhood pull 4)Connections to Town(s) and other existing routes 5)Route completion 6)Opportunity to act 7)Percent of budget (Bang for the buck) 8)Other?? Bob Elson 2/26/18 Prioritizing a List of Projects Reduce the list of possible projects to those that are budget-ready Order the list as a group, •Individual rankings are averaged (rank how well project fits criteria and each criteria is weighted) or--- •Dot voting (each person has 10-points & no more than 4-points on any project) or--- •MMA cage fight See if the ordered list makes sense, discuss, adjust Vote on prioritized list Bob Elson 2/26/18 Pathway Projects (Descriptions) (February 26, 2018) Bob Elson Count 2014/15 10 2015/16 15 2016/17 20 2017/18 10 55 • • • Project: Fremont Road to Redwood Grove Project: Fremont Road to Redwood Grove Criteria Finding Notes Safe routes to school Maybe Children on/near University going to Gardener Bullis K-6 Dangerous intersections/bends No Current routes in area involve a very step chute of dirt but no cars Neighborhood pull Yes Ginger Summit is in favor Connection to neighboring towns and existing routes Yes Great way to enter Redwood Grove and then into LA Other Yes LA mayor in favor so long as LAH pays for installation Relative Fab cost (1st order)$23K Native path Design, Eng, Survey Cost:$5K Perhaps small survey and a map for LA records Project: Altamont Plunge Project: Altamont Plunge Criteria Finding Notes Safe routes to school No Unless it is a long walk to Gardener Bullis Dangerous intersections/bends Yes Current drop puts you on Altamont with a great chance of a fall Neighborhood pull Yes Denise Williams Connection to neighboring towns and existing routes Yes Connects west bound paths on Altamont andn connects to off road path from Vinedo Other Yes This is a wildlife corredor so ending on something other than Altamont road is good Relative Fab cost (1st order)$42.5K IIB path with RW Design, Eng, Survey Cost:$15K Project: Estacada Loop (DeBell) Project: Estacada Loop (DeBell) Criteria Findin g Notes Safe routes to school Yes On Ed Comm List. Will finish most of Miranda/Manuella Loop Dangerous intersections/bends Yes Blind curve where people walk Neighborhood pull Yes Connection to neighboring towns and existing routes Yes Finishes (almost) Miranda/Manuella Loop Other Relative Fab cost (1st order)$8.0K IIB path Design, Eng, Survey Cost:$2K Project: Summerhill (El Monte to Magdalena) Project: Summerhill (El Monte to Magdalena) Criteria Finding Notes Safe routes to school Some St Nicholas is near. Dangerous intersections/bends Yes Cars are very fast and use street as a cut through for traffic purposes Neighborhood pull Yes Yes Connection to neighboring towns and existing routes Yes Route on both Magdalena and El Monte Other Relative Fab cost (1st order)$427K IIB path Design, Eng, Survey Cost:$75K Project: Bob Stutz Connector Project: Bob Stutz Connector Project: Bob Stutz Connector Criteria Finding Notes Safe routes to school No Dangerous intersections/bends Yes Keep people off of Hwy280 off ramp Neighborhood pull ? Connection to neighboring towns and existing routes Yes Bob Stutz path to Magdalena Other Yes Has been funded by TC for $142K but recent bids came in over $200K Relative Fab cost (1st order)$50K Change to Native path & save $ Design, Eng, Survey Cost:0 Survey already complete